Should you work hard until you make your signature into an autograph? Argument 1: Work until you no longer have to introduce yourself.
Only argument 1 is strong
The question asks whether one should work hard until their signature becomes an autograph. This phrase implies achieving a level of fame, recognition, or widespread acknowledgement where one's name is instantly recognized, and their signature is sought after by others.
We need to evaluate the strength of the two arguments provided in relation to this specific outcome of working hard.
Argument 1 states: "Work until you no longer have to introduce yourself."
Let's consider what it means to no longer have to introduce yourself. It signifies reaching a status where your name is widely known, respected, or famous enough that people already recognize who you are. This level of recognition is directly aligned with the idea of your signature becoming an autograph, which is valued because of the fame or prominence of the person signing it.
Therefore, Argument 1 provides a reason for working hard that directly addresses the desired outcome implied in the question's metaphor of a "signature into an autograph." Achieving a level where you don't need to introduce yourself is a strong indicator that your name carries significant weight and recognition.
This argument is strong because it provides a clear and relevant goal that, if achieved, would likely result in one's signature being considered an autograph.
Argument 2 states: "Work hard to become financially secure."
Financial security is a very common and valid reason for working hard. However, achieving financial security does not necessarily mean that your signature will become an autograph. Many people are financially secure through various means (e.g., successful business ownership, investments, stable high-paying jobs) without being famous or widely recognized by the general public in a way that makes their signature an autograph.
For example, a highly successful investor or a wealthy entrepreneur might be financially secure, but their signature is unlikely to be sought as an autograph unless they also achieve public fame outside their financial endeavors.
While working hard for financial security is important, this argument does not directly support or lead to the specific outcome of having one's signature become an autograph. The two concepts (financial security and widespread recognition leading to autograph status) are distinct, although they can sometimes overlap.
This argument is not strong in the context of the question because it presents a goal (financial security) that is not a direct or necessary consequence of achieving the state described in the question (signature becoming an autograph).
When evaluated against the specific scenario presented in the question ("signature into an autograph"), Argument 1 offers a reason (achieving recognition where you don't need to introduce yourself) that directly correlates with that scenario. Argument 2 offers a different, albeit important, reason for working hard (financial security) that does not necessarily lead to the outcome of one's signature becoming an autograph.
Therefore, only Argument 1 provides a strong justification directly relevant to the peculiar outcome described in the question.
Based on the analysis:
Thus, only Argument 1 is considered strong in the context of the question posed.
| Argument | Statement | Relevance to "Signature into Autograph" | Strength |
|---|---|---|---|
| Argument 1 | Work until you no longer have to introduce yourself. | Directly relates to achieving widespread recognition and fame. | Strong |
| Argument 2 | Work hard to become financially secure. | Financial security is a separate goal and does not guarantee the widespread recognition needed for an autograph. | Not Strong |
| Concept | Description | Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| Signature vs. Autograph | A signature is a personal identification mark; an autograph is a signature valued due to the fame of the person. | Defines the target outcome of the question. |
| Recognition/Fame | Being widely known or celebrated by the public. | The core idea behind a signature becoming an autograph. |
| Financial Security | Having sufficient income or wealth to cover living expenses and handle emergencies. | A common goal of work, but not directly linked to public recognition. |
People work hard for a variety of reasons, and these goals can sometimes overlap. Common goals include:
The question focuses on the specific goal of achieving a level of recognition where one's name is widely known, symbolized by the signature becoming an autograph. While financial security is a valid goal of working hard, it is distinct from achieving public recognition.
Given below is a question, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument, with respect to the question.
Question: Should advertisements be banned on television?
Argument I: Yes, advertisements are immoral.
Argument II: No, advertisements bring in revenue which helps reduce cost for viewers.Consider the given statement and decide which of the following argument(s) is/are strong.
Statement:
Should CBDT abolish income tax in India?
Argument 1: Yes, it is an unnecessary burden on the wage earners in India.
Argument 2: No, it is a good source of revenue for Indian Government.Consider the given statement and decide which of the given assumption(s) is (are) implicit
Statement:
The train fares have increased by 20% with immediate effect.
Assumptions:
I. People still prefer travelling by train despite the increase.
II. Other modes of commutation may also increase their fares.
Consider the argument and decide which of the given assumptions is / are implicit.
Argument:
Today is Sunday.
Assumption:
1. Tomorrow is Monday.
2. Today is a holiday.Read the given question and decide which of the following argument(s) is/are correct.
Hydrogen is in a cylinder.
Argument 1: Hydrogen is in a liquid state.
Argument 2: Hydrogen is in a gaseous state.Read the given question and decide which of the following argument is/are strong.
Are stock markets sources of wealth creation?
Arguments:
1. Yes, money multiplies in stock markets.
2. No, investments in stock markets are subjected to market risk.Consider the argument and decide which of the given assumptions is (are) implicit.
Argument:
The present government had reduced the base price for auctioning for the 2G spectrum.
Assumptions:
1. Next time price will reduce further.
2. Last time the auction was not good.
Consider the given argument and decide which of the given assumptions is (are) implicit.
Argument:
The year 2020 is a leap year.
Assumptions:
1. February will have 29 days in 2020.
2. The year 2017 is not a leap year.Read the following question and decide which of the given arguments is/are strong.
Question: Should CBSE introduce the retention system till Class 10?
Argument 1: Yes, as the foundations laid in lower classes are important for higher education.
Argument 2: No, it is boring for a student to repeat the same class again.Read the question and answer from the given information:
Pravalika is studying 10 th class. Is Pravalika elder than Pranitha who is her classmate?
Argument 1 : Yes, as she is her classmate Pranitha is younger to her.
Argument 2 : No, as she is classmate Pranitha is elder to her.Two statements S1 and S2 are given below followed by a Question:
S1: There are not more than two figures on any page of a 51-page book.
S2: There is at least one figure on every page.
Question: Are there more than 1oo figures in that book? Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above Statements and the Question?
Two Statements S 1 and S2 are given below with regard to four numbers P, Q, R and S followed by a Question:
S1: R is greater-than P as well as Q.
S2: S is not the largest one. Among four numbers P, Q, R and S which one is the largest?
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above Statements and the Question?
Two Statements Si and S2 are given below followed by a Question:
S1: n is a prime number.
S2: n leaves a remainder of 1 when divided by 4. If n is a unique natural number between 10 and 20, then what is n?
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above Statements and the Question?
Two Statements S1 and S2 are given below with regard to two numbers followed by a Question:
S1: Their product is 21.
S2: Their sum is 10. Question: What are the two numbers?
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above Statements and the Question?
Three Statements S1, S2 and S3 are given below followed by a Question:
S1: C is younger than D, but older than A and B.
S2: D is the oldest.
S3: A is older than B. Question: Who among A, B, C and D is the youngest?
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above Statements and the Question?