Read the question and answer from the given information: Should the government stop permission to new industries? Argument 1: Yes, new industries create environment pollution.
Only II is correct
Understanding the Question: Government and New Industries
The question asks for an evaluation of two arguments regarding whether the government should stop giving permission for new industries. It presents a dilemma: the potential negative impact of new industries (environment pollution) versus their potential positive impacts (employment and economic growth).
Analyzing Argument 1: Environment Pollution Concern
Argument 1 states: "Yes, new industries create environment pollution."
It is true that industrial activities can lead to various forms of environment pollution, including air pollution, water pollution, soil contamination, and noise pollution. This is a significant concern and governments worldwide implement regulations to mitigate it.
- Pollution can harm human health.
- It can damage ecosystems and biodiversity.
- It can contribute to climate change.
However, simply stating that industries cause pollution is often not considered a sufficient reason to stop all new industries entirely. Governments typically address pollution through regulatory measures, such as:
- Setting emission standards.
- Requiring pollution control technologies.
- Implementing environmental impact assessments before granting permission.
- Imposing fines for non-compliance.
An outright ban on new industries solely based on the potential for pollution might be seen as an overly drastic measure that doesn't consider potential benefits or the possibility of managed growth with environmental safeguards.
Analyzing Argument 2: Employment and Economic Growth Benefits
Argument 2 states: "No, New industries improves employment and takes part in economic growth of country."
This argument highlights the positive contributions of new industries to the economy and society:
- Employment: New industries create jobs directly (in manufacturing, operations, management) and indirectly (in supply chains, services supporting the industry, etc.). This reduces unemployment and improves living standards.
- Economic Growth: Industries contribute to the country's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) through production of goods and services. They can boost exports, attract investment, foster innovation, and contribute to government revenue through taxes.
These are widely recognized as essential goals for any government. The potential for increased employment and economic prosperity is a strong incentive for governments to encourage industrial development.
Evaluating the Arguments and the Correct Answer
The provided correct answer indicates that "Only II is correct". This means Argument 2 is considered a valid reason against stopping permission for new industries, while Argument 1 is not considered a sufficiently strong standalone reason to stop permission.
This perspective suggests that the economic and employment benefits highlighted in Argument 2 are seen as powerful and direct positive outcomes of allowing new industries. While the environmental concern in Argument 1 is valid, it is often viewed as an issue to be managed and mitigated through regulation rather than a reason for complete prohibition, especially when weighed against significant economic advantages.
Therefore, the argument focusing on employment and economic growth is considered the more compelling reason against stopping new industries in this context.
Revision Table: Government Policy and New Industries Arguments
| Argument | Stance on Stopping New Industries | Reason Provided | Common Government Approach |
|---|---|---|---|
| Argument 1 | Yes | Create environment pollution | Regulation and Mitigation |
| Argument 2 | No | Improves employment and economic growth | Encouragement and Facilitation |
Additional Information: Balancing Development and Environment
The debate presented in the question reflects a common challenge faced by governments globally: balancing economic development goals (like creating employment and fostering economic growth) with environmental protection concerns (like preventing environment pollution). Sustainable development aims to find ways for economies to grow while minimizing harm to the environment.
- Governments often use tools like permits, licenses, and environmental regulations to manage the impact of industries.
- Investment in green technologies and sustainable practices is encouraged to allow industrial growth with less pollution.
- Public opinion and international agreements also play a role in shaping policies regarding industries and the environment.
Evaluating arguments for government policy often involves weighing competing interests and potential outcomes.
Important Questions from Statements and Arguments
In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument.
Statement: Should the sale of alcohol near highways be banned?
Argument I: No, people should have the freedom to decide as it is their fundamental right.
Argument II: Yes, 90% of road accidents involve drivers who are under influence of alcohol.A question is given followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the question.
Question:
Should plastic bags be banned in India?
Arguments:
I. Yes, it is one of the sources of pollution and causes many diseases.
II. No, other alternatives of plastic may not be that colourful and attractive.A question is given followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the question.
Question:
Should all criminals be given severe punishments?
Arguments:
1. Yes. It will induce fear in criminals and crime would reduce greatly.
2. No. Human life is precious, and criminals should also be given a chance to improve.
A question is given followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the question.
Question:
Are joint families better than nuclear families?
Arguments:
1. Yes, joint families ensure security and the burden of work is shared.
2. No, nuclear families ensure freedom and there is no disturbance.
A question is given followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the question.
Question:
Should vegetarian food be banned in India?
Arguments:
I. No, it is cheap source of protein and other minerals and a lot of people can afford it.
II. No, it will violate people's freedom.
