All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.

Statements:
Some bugs are moths.
Some moths are parrots.

Conclusions:
(I) Some parrots are bugs.
(II) All moths are bugs.

This question was previously asked in
RRB ALP 2025 CBT 2 Mechanic Motor Vehicle Question Paper (28-Jul-2026) (Shift 1)
The correct answer is
Neither conclusion (I) nor (II) follows.

Logical Reasoning Analysis: Bugs, Moths, Parrots

This solution analyzes the logical validity of given conclusions based on the provided statements. We assess whether the conclusions necessarily follow from the premises.

Statement Analysis

The given statements are:

  • Statement 1: Some bugs are moths. (This means there is at least one bug that is also a moth, but it does not imply all bugs are moths, nor all moths are bugs.)
  • Statement 2: Some moths are parrots. (This means there is at least one moth that is also a parrot, but it does not imply all moths are parrots, nor all parrots are moths.)

Conclusion (I) Evaluation

Conclusion (I): Some parrots are bugs.

This conclusion does not logically follow. The set of moths that are bugs (from Statement 1) could be entirely separate from the set of moths that are parrots (from Statement 2). Therefore, there's no guaranteed overlap between the 'bugs' category and the 'parrots' category based solely on these statements.

Conclusion (II) Evaluation

Conclusion (II): All moths are bugs.

This conclusion is invalid. Statement 1 ("Some bugs are moths") only confirms an intersection between the sets of bugs and moths. It does not provide information to conclude that the entire set of moths is contained within the set of bugs. Moths could exist that are not bugs.

Final Determination

Since neither Conclusion (I) nor Conclusion (II) is logically guaranteed by the given statements, neither conclusion follows.

Was this answer helpful?

Similar Questions

  1. Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.

    Statements:

    Some glasses are spoons.

    All spoons are forks.

    Conclusions:

    (I) Some glasses are forks.

    (II) All forks are spoons.

  2. Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.

    Statements: All girls are hens. No hen is a cat.

    Conclusion (I): No girl is a cat.

    Conclusion (II): Some cats are hens.

  3. Read the given statement(s) and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statement(s).

    Statements:
    All cows are buttons.
    All fingers are buttons.

    Conclusions:
    (I) No cows are fingers.
    (II) Some fingers are cows.
  4. Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
    Statements:
    All angry are birds.
    Some angry are pigs.
    Conclusion (I): Some birds are pigs.
    Conclusion (II): All pigs are birds.
  5. Read the given statement(s) and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statement(s).

    Statements:
    All kings are bombs.
    No parrots are kings.

    Conclusions:
    (I) Some bombs are not parrots.
    (II) Some bombs are kings.
  6. Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.

    Statements:
    Some mugs are goats.
    All goats are squares.

    Conclusions:
    (I) Some mugs are squares.
    (II) Some squares are goats.
  7. Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the statements.

    Statements:
    All speakers are radios.
    No radio is a television.

    Conclusions:
    (I) No speaker is a television.
    (II) Some televisions are radios.
  8. Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.

    Statements:
    Some doctors are eagles.
    No snakes are doctors.

    Conclusions:
    (I) Some eagles are not snakes.
    (II) All eagles are doctors.
  9. Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.

    Statements:
    Some Indians are Americans.
    Some Americans are Russians.

    Conclusions:
    (I) No Russian is an American.
    (II) All Indians are Russians.
  10. Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the statements.

    Statements:
    Some mats are carpets.
    All carpets are rugs.

    Conclusions:
    (I) Some mats are rugs.
    (II) All rugs are carpets.

Important Questions from Syllogism

  1. Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.

    Statements:

    All fruits are stems.

    Some fruits are leaves.

    Conclusions:

    I. Some stems are leaves.

    II. Some leaves are fruits.

  2. Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.

    Statements:

    Some students are players.

    All players are male.

    Conclusions:

    I. All males are players.

    II. Some males are students.

  3. Read the given statement(s) and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statement(s).

    Statements:

    Some Queens are kings.

    All kings are officers.

    No officer is architect.

    Conclusions:

    I. Some officers are queens.

    II. No king is architect.

  4. Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.

    Statements:

    No creative is an employer.

    All experts are creative.

    All workers are experts.

    Conclusions:

    I. No employer is an expert.

    II. No worker is an employer.

  5. Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.

    Statements:

    Some actors are choreographers.

    All choreographers are producers.

    Not a single producer is a director.

    Conclusions:

    I. Some actors are directors.

    II. Not a single actor is a director.

Need Expert Advice?
Upcoming Exams
RRB NTPC
September 27, 2026
Test Series
RRB ALP img
Railways
RRB ALP 2026 Mock Test series
1035 Tests 1 Tests Free
856 Attempts
4.3(235)
English, Hindi
More Questions from RRB ALP

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App