Read the given statement(s) and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statement(s). Statements: Some coats are tables. No table is a mirror. All golds are tables. Conclusions: I. Some coats being golds is a possibility. II. No gold is a mirror. III. All tables are golds. IV. No coat is a mirror.
Only Conclusions I and II follow
Understanding Logic Statements and Conclusions
This question requires us to analyze given statements and determine which conclusions logically follow from them. In logic problems like this, we must strictly adhere to the information provided in the statements, even if it contradicts real-world knowledge. We can use methods like Venn diagrams or logical rules to represent the relationships and test the validity of the conclusions.
Analyzing the Given Statements
Let's break down the statements:
- Statement 1: Some coats are tables. (Represents an overlap between the set of Coats and the set of Tables)
- Statement 2: No table is a mirror. (Represents no overlap between the set of Tables and the set of Mirrors)
- Statement 3: All golds are tables. (Represents the set of Golds being entirely contained within the set of Tables)
Evaluating Each Conclusion Based on the Statements
Now, let's examine each conclusion one by one to see if it is logically derived from the statements.
Conclusion I: Some coats being golds is a possibility.
From Statement 1, we know there is an overlap between Coats and Tables (Some Coats are Tables). From Statement 3, we know that the entire set of Golds is inside the set of Tables (All Golds are Tables). Since some part of Coats is within Tables, it is possible that this overlapping part of Coats and Tables also overlaps with the part of Tables that represents Golds. There is no statement that prohibits this overlap between Coats and Golds within the domain of Tables. Therefore, it is a possible scenario.
Conclusion I logically follows as a possibility.
Conclusion II: No gold is a mirror.
From Statement 3, we know that all Golds are Tables (Golds ⊂ Tables). From Statement 2, we know that no Table is a Mirror (Tables ∩ Mirrors = ∅). If the entire set of Golds is inside the set of Tables, and the set of Tables has no overlap with the set of Mirrors, then it must be true that the set of Golds also has no overlap with the set of Mirrors. Therefore, no gold is a mirror is a definite conclusion.
Conclusion II logically follows definitely.
Conclusion III: All tables are golds.
Statement 3 says, "All golds are tables" (Golds ⊂ Tables). This means that every element in the set of Golds is also in the set of Tables. However, this does not mean that every element in the set of Tables is also in the set of Golds. There could be tables that are not golds. The statement establishes a relationship from Golds to Tables, not the other way around for "all".
Conclusion III does not logically follow.
Conclusion IV: No coat is a mirror.
From Statement 1, some coats are tables (Coats ∩ Tables ≠ ∅). From Statement 2, no table is a mirror (Tables ∩ Mirrors = ∅). This tells us that the portion of coats that *are* tables cannot be mirrors. However, the statements do not provide any information about the coats that are *not* tables. These non-table coats could potentially be mirrors, or they could not be. We cannot make a definite conclusion about all coats based only on the relationship of tables to mirrors and the partial overlap of coats with tables.
Conclusion IV does not logically follow definitely.
Summary of Conclusions
Based on the analysis:
- Conclusion I: Some coats being golds is a possibility. (Follows)
- Conclusion II: No gold is a mirror. (Follows)
- Conclusion III: All tables are golds. (Does not follow)
- Conclusion IV: No coat is a mirror. (Does not follow)
Therefore, only Conclusions I and II logically follow from the given statements.
Revision Table: Statements and Conclusions
| Statement/Conclusion | Relationship | Analysis | Follows? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Statement 1 | Some Coats are Tables | Partial overlap (Coats & Tables) | Given |
| Statement 2 | No Table is a Mirror | No overlap (Tables & Mirrors) | Given |
| Statement 3 | All Golds are Tables | Golds ⊂ Tables | Given |
| Conclusion I | Some coats being golds is a possibility. | Overlap of C & T could be in G (which is in T). Possible. | Yes (as a possibility) |
| Conclusion II | No gold is a mirror. | If G ⊂ T and T ∩ M = ∅, then G ∩ M = ∅. Definite. | Yes (definitely) |
| Conclusion III | All tables are golds. | Statements only say G ⊂ T, not T ⊂ G. Not definite. | No |
| Conclusion IV | No coat is a mirror. | Overlap of C & T not in M. But coats outside the overlap? Not definite. | No |
Additional Information: Types of Conclusions in Logic
In logic and syllogism problems, conclusions can follow in different ways:
- Definitely Follows: The conclusion must be true if the statements are true. There is no scenario based on the statements where the conclusion could be false. (e.g., Conclusion II)
- Follows as a Possibility: The conclusion is not necessarily true, but it is not contradicted by the statements. There is at least one possible scenario based on the statements where the conclusion could be true. (e.g., Conclusion I)
- Does Not Follow: The conclusion is either contradicted by the statements or cannot be confirmed as true (either definitely or as a possibility) based solely on the statements. (e.g., Conclusions III and IV as definite conclusions)
It's crucial to distinguish between what is definitely true and what is merely possible based on the given information.
Similar Questions
An amount of Rs.10,000 is invested at a compound interest rate of 8% per annum for a period of 2 years. What will be the total amount (principal + interest) received at the end of the 2-year period?
Select the option figure in which the given figure (X) is embedded (rotation is NOT allowed).
Select the option that is related to the third word in the same way as the second word is related to the first word. (The words must be considered as meaningful English words and must not be related to each other based on the number of letters/number of consonants/vowels in the word.)
Rice ∶ Grain ∶ ∶ Lentils ∶ ?
Select the set in which the numbers are related in the same way as are the numbers of the given set.
(NOTE: Operations should be performed on the whole numbers, without breaking down the numbers into its constituent digits. E.g. 13 - Operations on 13 such as adding / subtracting / multiplying etc. to 13 can be performed. Breaking down 13 into 1 and 3 and then performing mathematical operations on 1 and 3 is not allowed.)
(3, 13, 18)
(29, 39, 44)
Which letter-cluster will replace the question mark (?) to complete the given series?
XDNC, VGOE, ?, RMQI, PPRK
By interchanging the given two signs which of the following equation will be not correct?
+ and ÷
Select the option that is related to the third term in the same way as the second term is related to the first term and the sixth term is related to the fifth term.
4 : 84 :: 11 : ? :: 13 : 2379
A # B means 'A is the brother of B'.
A @ B means 'A is the son of B'.
A & B means 'A is the father of B'.
A % B means 'A is the mother of B'.
If W # Q @ T & Y @ M % K % L, then how is K related to W?
In the following question, select the missing number from the given series.
7, 21, 63, 189, 567, ?
By Interchanging the given two numbers which of the following equation will be correct?
5 and 8
Important Questions from Miscellaneous
A stone is thrown horizontally from the top of a 20 m high building with a speed of 12 m/s. It hits the ground at a distance R from the building. Taking g = 10 m/s2 and neglecting air resistance will give :
A mass is attached to a spring that hangs vertically. The extension produced in the spring is 6 cm on Earth. The acceleration due to gravity on the surface of the Moon is one-sixth of its value on the surface of the Earth. The extension of the spring on the Moon would be:
Directions: Each item in this section consists of a sentence with an underlined word followed by four words (a), (b), (c), and (d). Select the option that is opposite in meaning to the underlined word and mark your response in your Answer Sheet accordingly.
The deluge affected the population.The major source of vitamins and minerals for vegetarians is
Which of the following statements about the Deccan Riots Commission is/are correct?
1. The Commission did not hold enquiries in the districts which were not affected.
2. The Commission did record the statements of ryots, sahukars and eye-witnesses.
Select the correct answer using the code given below:
