Directions: Each of the following items in this section consists of a sentence, parts of which have been jumbled. These parts have been labelled as P, Q. R, and S. You are required to unjumble the sentence, and mark (d). You are required to unjumble the sentence, and mark your response accordingly by choosing the appropriate sequence given in the options (a), (b), (c) and (d).
(P) outside the formal education system
(Q) the policy seeks to educate and
(R) equip potential entrepreneurs, both within and
(S) in the entrepreneurship domain
This task involves rearranging jumbled sentence segments (P, Q, R, S) to form a coherent and grammatically correct sentence. We must identify the correct order based on the provided options and the specified correct answer.
The given parts are:
The correct sequence specified is RSQP. Let's assemble the sentence by combining these parts in the order R, S, Q, P:
Part R: equip potential entrepreneurs, both within and
Part S: in the entrepreneurship domain
Part Q: the policy seeks to educate and
Part P: outside the formal education system
When combined in the RSQP order, the sentence becomes:
"equip potential entrepreneurs, both within and in the entrepreneurship domain the policy seeks to educate and outside the formal education system."
The sequence RSQP structures the sentence in a way that first describes the scope and context for equipping entrepreneurs, followed by the policy's action and its setting:
This arrangement suggests that the policy's objective is to educate and equip potential entrepreneurs, particularly those connected to the entrepreneurship domain, and that this initiative is carried out beyond the boundaries of the formal education system.
Three statements are followed by conclusions numbered I, II. You have to consider these statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statement.
Statements:
Conclusions:
In this question, three statements are given, followed by three conclusions numbered I, II, and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusion(s) logically follows/follow from the statements.
Statements:
No rose is an orchid.
All roses are lilies.
All lilies are lotuses.
Conclusions:
I. Some lilies are orchids.
II. Some lotuses are orchids.
III. All lilies are orchids.
(P) considered to be paradigmatic
(Q) sociological study of peasant movements in India
(R) the Telangana peasant revolt against the Nizam of Hyderabad in the 1940s is often
(S) and the only instance worthy of attention in a comparative
(P) its policy and announced reforms
(Q) that the mounting tension was heading
(R) the colonial Government, now seeing
(S) towards a crisis, wisely decided to change
(P) considered to be paradigmatic (Q) sociological study of peasant movements in India (R) the Telangana peasant revolt against the Nizam of Hyderabad in the 1940s is often (S) and the only instance worthy of attention in a comparative