In the following examples, a number is coded as three digits — representing the remainders when the number is divided by 3, 7, and 11, respectively.
Example 1: $53 \rightarrow 53 \div 3 = 17 \text{ R} 2$, $53 \div 7 = 7 \text{ R } 4$, $53 \div 11 = 4 \text{ R } 9 \rightarrow \text{ Code: } 2, 4, 9$
Example 2: $68 \rightarrow 68 \div 3 = 22 \text{ R} 2$, $68 \div 7 = 9 \text{ R } 5$, $68 \div 11 = 6 \text{ R } 2 \rightarrow \text{ Code: } 2, 5, 2$
By following this method, which is the least number which would have the code - 2, 2, 2?
The question describes a method where a number is represented by three digits. These digits are the remainders when the original number is divided by 3, 7, and 11, respectively.
For example, the number 53 results in the code (2, 4, 9) because:
We need to find the least number that corresponds to the code (2, 2, 2).
A number with the code (2, 2, 2) must satisfy the following conditions simultaneously:
Since the remainder (2) is the same for all divisors (3, 7, 11), the number $N$ must be 2 more than a multiple of the least common multiple (LCM) of 3, 7, and 11.
The numbers 3, 7, and 11 are prime numbers. Therefore, their LCM is simply their product:
$\text{LCM}(3, 7, 11) = 3 \times 7 \times 11 = 21 \times 11 = 231$.
So, the number $N$ must satisfy the condition:
$N \equiv 2 \pmod{231}$
This means $N$ can be expressed in the form $N = 231k + 2$, where $k$ is a non-negative integer.
To find the *least* such number, we start with the smallest possible value for $k$, which is $k=0$.
The possible numbers are 2, 233, 464, and so on. We are looking for the least number among the given options that fits this pattern. The smallest number generated this way, which is also a three-digit number typically expected in such problems, is 233.
Let's check if the number 233 yields the code (2, 2, 2):
The remainders are indeed (2, 2, 2). Since 233 is the smallest number greater than 2 that fits the condition $N \equiv 2 \pmod{231}$, it is the least number with the specified code.
Which of the following statement is TRUE for Whole Numbers?
Consider the following statements :
1. (25)! + 1 is divisible by 26
2. (6)! + 1 is divisible by 7
Which of the above statements is/are correct ?
If the sum S is divided by 8, what is the remainder ?
If the sum S is divided by 60, what is the remainder ?
Find the sum of squares of the greatest value and the smallest value of K in the number so that the number 45082K is divisible by 3.
How many composite numbers are there from 53 to 97 ?