Assertion (A): Migrants who enter a new country or region are called immigrants.
Reason (R): Emigrants are people who leave their country to settle elsewhere.
Immigrants and Emigrants Definitions
This question asks us to evaluate two statements about migration terminology: an Assertion (A) defining immigrants and a Reason (R) defining emigrants. We need to determine if both statements are true and if the Reason correctly explains the Assertion.
Assertion Analysis: Immigrants Entering Regions
Assertion (A) states: "Migrants who enter a new country or region are called immigrants."
- This statement is true.
- An immigrant is specifically defined as a person who comes to live permanently in a foreign country. The key action is entering or settling in a new country.
Reason Analysis: Emigrants Leaving Countries
Reason (R) states: "Emigrants are people who leave their country to settle elsewhere."
- This statement is also true.
- An emigrant is defined as a person who leaves their own country in order to settle in another. The key action here is leaving one's native country.
Connecting Assertion and Reason
The question implies that Reason (R) is a correct explanation for Assertion (A). While both definitions are distinct and accurate, understanding the concept of emigration (leaving a country) helps clarify the concept of immigration (entering a country). They represent two sides of the same migration flow. When someone emigrates from Country X, they simultaneously immigrate to Country Y. Therefore, knowing that an emigrant is someone who leaves helps define the parallel concept of an immigrant as someone who arrives, framing the terminology within the broader context of population movement.
Both statements are factually correct definitions within the study of migration and population geography. The reason provided (defining emigrants) supports the assertion (defining immigrants) by offering a related concept that completes the picture of migration, highlighting the perspective shift based on the country being discussed.
Similar Questions
- Given below are assertion and reason, read the statements and choose the correct option.
Assertion: British capital accumulation in the 18th century was reinvested in industrial development.
Reason: The capital was largely controlled by merchants and industrialists instead of the feudal aristocracy. - Given below are assertion and reason, read the statements and choose the correct option.
Assertion(A): Sir Charles Napier justified the annexation of Sindh on moral and legal grounds.
Reason(R): He described it as a "useful humane piece of rascality." - In each of the following questions, a statement labeled Assertion (A) is given, followed by a statement labeled Reason (R).
Assertion (A): Migration can be driven by negative and positive circumstances.
Reason (R): Push factors make individuals migrate away from a region, whereas pull factors draw individuals to a region. - Consider the following two statements, labeled Assertion (A) and Reason (R). Evaluate them and choose the appropriate answer from the given options.
Assertion (A): India's participation in the Asian Winter Games 2025 will be unique, as it will be the first time the government has provided full financial support.
Reason (R): The government's objective is to enhance India's presence and performance in winter sports by ensuring fair and meritocratic athlete selection. - Given below are two statements marked as Assertion (A) and Reason (R). Read and mark the correct options:
Assertion (A):
The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, promotes e-filing and virtual trials to expedite the justice delivery system.
Reason (R):
The integration of technology aims to reduce case pendency and enhance accessibility to justice.
Important Questions from Assertion & Reason
Directions for the following 6 (six) items: Given below are six items. Each item describes a situation and is followed by four possible responses. Indicate the response you find most appropriate. Choose only one response for each item. The responses will be evaluated based on the level of appropriateness for the given situation. Please attempt all the items. There is no penalty for, wrong answers for these six items. You are the head of your office. There are certain houses reserved for the allotment to the office staff and you have been given the discretion to do so. A set of rules for the allotment of the houses has been laid down by you and has been made public. Your personal secretary, who is very close to you, comes to you and pleads that as his father is seriously ill, he should be given priority in allotment of a house. The office secretariat that examined the request as per the rules turns down the request and recommends the procedure to be followed according to the rules. You do not want to annoy your personal secretary. In such circumstances, what would you do ?
While travelling in a Delhi-registered commercial taxi from Delhi to an adjacent city (another State), your taxi driver informs you that as he has no permit for running the taxi in that city, he will stop at its Transport Office and pay the prescribed fee of Rs. forty for a day. While paying the fee at the counter you find that the transport clerk is taking an extra fifty rupees for which no receipt is being given. You are in a hurry for your meeting. In such circumstances, what would you do?
A person lives in a far off village which is almost two hours by bus. The villager's neighbour is a very powerful landlord who is trying to occupy the poor villager's land by force. You are the District Magistrate and busy in a meeting called by a local Minister. The villager has come all the way, by bus and on foot, to see you and give an application seeking protection from the powerful landlord. The villager keeps on waiting outside the meeting hall for an hour. You come out of the meeting and are rushing to another meeting. The villager follows you to submit his application. What would you do?
There IS a shortage of sugar in your District where you are the District Magistrate. The Government has ordered that only a maximum amount of 30 kg sugar is to be released for wedding celebrations. A son of your close friend is getting married and your friend requests you to release at least 50 kg sugar for his son's wedding. He expresses annoyance when you tell him about the Government's restrictions on this matter. He feels that since you are the District Magistrate you can release any amount. You do not want to spoil your friendship with him. In such circumstances, how would you deal with the situation?
You are in-charge of implementing the Family Planning programme in an area where there is a strong opposition to the present policy. You want to convince the residents of the need for keeping small families. What would be the best way of communicating this message?
