First coins in Indian history bearing the names and images of rulers were issued by the:
The question asks about which dynasty or group of rulers first introduced coins in Indian history that featured both their names and their images. This marks a significant development in the evolution of coinage in the subcontinent.
Early coinage in India, like the punch-marked coins (Puranas, Karshapanas) prevalent during the Mahajanapadas and the Mauryan Empire, typically did not carry the names or portraits of rulers. These coins were usually pieces of silver or copper stamped with various symbols.
The practice of putting the ruler's portrait and name on coins was a tradition rooted in the Hellenistic world. When the Indo-Greeks established their rule in parts of northwestern India (roughly from the 2nd century BCE), they brought this tradition with them.
Let's consider the other options provided:
Based on historical evidence, the Indo-Greeks were the first rulers in Indian history to consistently issue coins bearing both the names and realistic images of the rulers. This significantly changed the nature of coinage in the region and influenced later Indian dynasties like the Guptas.
| Dynasty/Period | Coin Type | Ruler Name/Image on Coin? |
|---|---|---|
| Early India (Mahajanapadas, Mauryas) | Punch-marked coins | No |
| Indo-Greeks | Die-struck coins (Hellenistic style) | Yes (First in India) |
| Guptas | Die-struck coins (Indianised style) | Yes (Followed Indo-Greeks) |
| Pushyabhutis | Various types | Yes (Followed earlier traditions) |
Therefore, the first coins in Indian history featuring the names and images of rulers were issued by the Indo-Greeks.
| Key Feature | Introduction in Indian Coinage |
|---|---|
| First coins with Rulers' Names and Images | Indo-Greeks |
The Indo-Greeks ruled over parts of Gandhara and Punjab. Their coinage is particularly important for historical reconstruction because the coins, with their portraits and inscriptions, provide the names of many rulers who are otherwise known from very limited sources. The quality of their portraits is often remarkably high, reflecting the artistic standards of the Hellenistic world. The bilingual inscriptions (Greek and Kharosthi) were also a significant feature, catering to both Greek and local populations.
Which one of the following statements about Rabatak inscription is not correct?
Yashovarman was ruler of which one of the following kingdoms?
Near which one of the following cities in India have large statues of Kushana rulers been discovered?
Which one of the following epic of ancient India has the love story of the son of the founder of the Sunga dynasty?
Which of the following statement is correct?
I. Most of the Ashoka’'s inscriptions were in Prakrit language.
Il. Kalinga is the ancient name of coastal Orissa.
Which of these statements are correct
(A) Shaka administration continued largely along the lines of the Achaemenid and Seleucid system in Iran
(B) The kingdom during Shaka was divided into provinces, each under a military governor called Mahakshatrapa
(C) Another official title was Meridrach, an officer in charge of designated area in Shaka administration
(D) The minting of some coins during shakas in joint names of two rulers meant that the king associated himself with a ruler of lesser status
(E) Shaka kings took lesser titles as Samant
Choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below:
Which of these statements are correct
(A) The post-Mauryan centuries saw a great spurt in the minting of coins
(B) The kings of the north-west imitated Greek. Roman and Iranian coin-types
(C) The increasing use of money did not drive out the barter systems, particularly in rural areas in post-Maurya period
(D) During post-Mauryas diverse use of coins indicates the variant trading economies
(E) Gold coins during post-Mauryas were Nishka & Suvarna and silver coins Shatamana were in use
Choose the most appopriate answer from the options given below:
Which of the following is not mentioned in the Satavahana inscriptions, while specifying the exemptions granted to the donees of land-gifts ?