"Any departure from the terms of the offer or the addition of any qualification while accepting the offer vitiates the acceptance unless it is agreed to by the offeror." Elucidate the statement in the light of the provisions of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 and established principles.
The statement reflects a core principle of contract law: for a valid contract, acceptance must be absolute and unqualified, as codified in Section 7 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, which provides that “In order to convert a proposal into a promise, the acceptance must be absolute and unqualified.”
Mirror Image Rule: Acceptance must exactly match the offer without alterations. Any modification, addition, or condition amounts to a counter-offer, which rejects the original offer and creates a new one. For example, if A offers to sell a car for ₹5 lakh, and B replies, “I accept, but only if you include a full tank of petrol,” B has made a counter-offer, not an acceptance.
Case Law: In Hyde v. Wrench (1840), an offer to sell for £1,000 met a counter-offer of £950, which was rejected. A later attempt to accept the original £1,000 offer was invalid, as the counter-offer had extinguished it.
Unqualified Acceptance: Conditional acceptance, such as “subject to contract” or “subject to final approval,” indicates ongoing negotiation, preventing a binding contract.
Communication of Acceptance: Acceptance must be communicated to the offeror (Section 4, ICA). Until communication is complete, no contract arises.
Rationale: This strict rule ensures certainty and avoids ambiguity, requiring consensus ad idem (meeting of minds) on all essential terms. Any qualifications or conditions indicate that parties have not agreed fully, and the offeror must explicitly agree to any new terms before a valid contract is formed.
Answered By:
Similar Questions
Answer in 150 words. Support your answer with relevant legal provisions and judicial pronouncements:
Under what circumstances can the appropriate government commute the sentence of death and life imprisonment for anyother punishment? Discuss.Answer in 150 words. Support your answer with relevant legal provisions and judicial pronouncements:
"Doctrine of foreseeability', not the 'proximity', is a correct test of 'remoteness'." Explain with the help of case-laws.Answer in 150 words. Support your answer with relevant legal provisions and judicial pronouncements:
Explain the principle of liability of master for the torts committed by his servant. Write case-laws.Answer in 150 words. Support your answer with relevant legal provisions and judicial pronouncements:
Describe the salient features of the Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955.
"Homicide means killing of a human being by a human being." Explain the statement and distinguish between culpable homicide amounting to murder and not amounting to murder.
Answer in 150 words. Support your answer with relevant legal provisions and judicial pronouncements:
"The definition of 'public servant' as per the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is only illustrative and not exhaustive." Comment."Right to private defence is a valuable right but it must be exercised reasonably." Explain with examples.
Discuss the law of defamation. Is this correct to say that law of defamation gives too much protection to 'reputation' and imposes too a great restriction on the freedom of speech? Comment.
"The law of torts is said to be a development of the maxim ubi jus ibi remedium." Illustrate your answer with the help of decided case-laws.
"Nuisance is no branch of negligence." Explain. Describe who can sue and who is liable for nuisance.
Important Questions from Miscellaneous
Write a note in 150 words
Mendelian and non-Mendelian traits.Write a note in 150 words
Theoretical significance of Purum kinship-system.Write a note in 150 words
Smell as a signal among non-human primates.Write a note in 150 words
Osteodontokeratik culture and its makers.Discuss the Miocene hominoid remains and their significance in evolution.
