A Question is given followed by two Statements I and II. Consider the Question and the Statements and mark the correct Option Question: In a football match, team P playing against Q was behind by 3 goals with 10 minutes remaining. Does team P win the match? Statement I: Team P Scored 4 goals in the last 10 minutes Statement II: Team Q Scored a total of 4 goals in the match Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above Question and the Statements?
The Question cannot be answered even using any of the Statements.
The question asks whether Team P wins a football match against Team Q, given that P was 3 goals behind Q with 10 minutes remaining. We are provided with two statements and need to determine if either statement alone or both statements together are sufficient to answer the question.
With 10 minutes left in the match, Team P was 3 goals behind Team Q. Let's denote the score at this point as follows:
According to the question, Team P was behind by 3 goals, so: $S_{Q, 10} - S_{P, 10} = 3$
We want to know if Team P wins the match. This means we need to compare the final score of Team P ($S_{P, final}$) with the final score of Team Q ($S_{Q, final}$). Team P wins if $S_{P, final} > S_{Q, final}$.
Statement I: Team P Scored 4 goals in the last 10 minutes.
This statement gives us information about Team P's scoring in the final part of the match. P's final score is the score it had with 10 minutes left plus the goals scored in the last 10 minutes:
$S_{P, final} = S_{P, 10} + 4$
However, Statement I gives no information about whether Team Q scored any goals in the last 10 minutes. Let's denote the goals scored by Q in the last 10 minutes as $G_{Q, last 10}$. Q's final score would be:
$S_{Q, final} = S_{Q, 10} + G_{Q, last 10}$
We know $S_{Q, 10} = S_{P, 10} + 3$. Substituting this into the equation for $S_{Q, final}$:
$S_{Q, final} = (S_{P, 10} + 3) + G_{Q, last 10}$
Team P wins if $S_{P, final} > S_{Q, final}$. Substituting the expressions for final scores:
$S_{P, 10} + 4 > (S_{P, 10} + 3) + G_{Q, last 10}$
Simplifying the inequality:
$4 > 3 + G_{Q, last 10}$
$1 > G_{Q, last 10}$
For Team P to win, the number of goals scored by Team Q in the last 10 minutes ($G_{Q, last 10}$) must be less than 1. Since the number of goals must be a whole number, this means $G_{Q, last 10}$ must be 0.
Statement I only tells us about P's scoring. It does not tell us if Q scored 0 goals, 1 goal, or more goals in the last 10 minutes.
Since Statement I alone does not provide information about $G_{Q, last 10}$, we cannot definitively determine if $1 > G_{Q, last 10}$ is true. Therefore, Statement I alone is not sufficient to answer the question.
Statement II: Team Q Scored a total of 4 goals in the match.
This statement gives us Team Q's final score:
$S_{Q, final} = 4$
We still have the initial information that $S_{Q, 10} - S_{P, 10} = 3$. Statement II tells us $S_{Q, final} = 4$, but it does not give us any information about Team P's scoring throughout the match, especially in the last 10 minutes, which is crucial. We know $S_{P, final} = S_{P, 10} + G_{P, last 10}$, where $G_{P, last 10}$ are the goals P scored in the last 10 minutes.
Knowing $S_{Q, final}$ and the score difference with 10 minutes left does not allow us to determine $S_{P, final}$. We don't know $S_{P, 10}$, $S_{Q, 10}$, or $G_{P, last 10}$.
For example:
Statement II alone does not provide enough information about Team P's final score to compare it with Team Q's final score. Therefore, Statement II alone is not sufficient to answer the question.
Let's combine the information from both statements:
From the question: $S_{Q, 10} - S_{P, 10} = 3$ From Statement I: $G_{P, last 10} = 4$, so $S_{P, final} = S_{P, 10} + 4$ From Statement II: $S_{Q, final} = 4$
We also know that Q's final score is its score with 10 minutes left plus goals scored in the last 10 minutes:
$S_{Q, final} = S_{Q, 10} + G_{Q, last 10}$
Substitute $S_{Q, final} = 4$ into this equation:
$4 = S_{Q, 10} + G_{Q, last 10}$
Also, from the initial condition, $S_{Q, 10} = S_{P, 10} + 3$. Substitute this into the equation above:
$4 = (S_{P, 10} + 3) + G_{Q, last 10}$
Simplify:
$1 = S_{P, 10} + G_{Q, last 10}$
We want to determine if $S_{P, final} > S_{Q, final}$, which is $S_{P, 10} + 4 > 4$. This simplifies to $S_{P, 10} > 0$.
From the equation $1 = S_{P, 10} + G_{Q, last 10}$, considering that scores must be non-negative whole numbers ($S_{P, 10} \ge 0$ and $G_{Q, last 10} \ge 0$), we have possible pairs for $(S_{P, 10}, G_{Q, last 10})$ that sum to 1:
We have found two scenarios that are consistent with both statements:
| Scenario | Score with 10 mins left (P, Q) | Goals in last 10 mins (P, Q) | Final Score (P, Q) | Does P Win? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case 1 | (1, 4) | (4, 0) | (5, 4) | Yes |
| Case 2 | (0, 3) | (4, 1) | (4, 4) | No (Draw) |
Since in Case 1, P wins, and in Case 2, P does not win (it's a draw), even combining both statements does not allow us to definitively answer whether Team P wins the match. The answer depends on how the goals leading up to the score difference of 3 and Q's total of 4 were distributed over the match duration, specifically how many goals Q scored in the last 10 minutes.
Neither Statement I alone, nor Statement II alone, nor both statements together provide sufficient information to determine if Team P wins the match. The crucial missing piece is information about Team Q's scoring in the last 10 minutes.
| Information Source | Sufficient to Answer "Does P Win?" | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|
| Statement I Alone | No | Doesn't provide information about Q's score in the last 10 minutes. |
| Statement II Alone | No | Doesn't provide information about P's scoring, especially in the last 10 minutes relative to the score difference. |
| Both Statements Together | No | Possible scenarios lead to different outcomes (P wins vs. Draw), depending on how Q's total score of 4 and the 3-goal lead with 10 mins left occurred (specifically, Q's scoring in the last 10 minutes). |
This problem is an example of a data sufficiency question often found in logical reasoning or quantitative sections of tests. The key is to determine if the given information *uniquely* leads to a single conclusion (either "Yes, P wins" or "No, P does not win"). If multiple outcomes are possible based on the statements, then the information is not sufficient.
In football, scores are always non-negative integers. This constraint is important when considering possible score combinations. A draw occurs when $S_{P, final} = S_{Q, final}$. Losing occurs when $S_{P, final} < S_{Q, final}$. Winning occurs when $S_{P, final} > S_{Q, final}$. The question specifically asks "Does team P win the match?", which requires the strict inequality $S_{P, final} > S_{Q, final}$ to be definitively true.
Score progression matters. A score of (1, 4) with 10 minutes left means P had 1 goal and Q had 4 goals at that specific moment. A total score of 4 for Q means their goals accumulated over the entire match sum to 4. How that total of 4 was reached (e.g., 3 goals by the 80th minute and 1 more goal in the last 10 minutes, or all 4 goals scored before the 80th minute) impacts the score difference at the 80th minute and is relevant when combined with information about scoring in the last 10 minutes.
Which one of the following statements best reflects the critical message conveyed by the author of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. No country needs to depend on ecosystems to boost national income.
II. Resource-rich countries need to share their resources with those of scant resources so as to prevent the degradation of ecosystems.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Which one of the following statements best reflects the central idea of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. Path-dependent green investments will eventually most likely benefit growth as well as public finances in a country like India.
II. If other green technologies follow the same pattern as that of solar energy, there will most likely be an easy green transition.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Three prime numbers p, q and r, each less than 20, are such that p − q = q − r. How many distinct possible values can we get for (p + q + r)?
How many possible values of (p + q + r) are there satisfying 1/p + 1/q + 1/r = 1, where p, q and r are natural numbers (not necessarily distinct)?
What comes at X and Y respectively in the following sequence?
January, January, December, October, X, March, October, Y, September
Team X scored a total of N runs in 20 overs. Team Y tied the score in 10% less overs. Had Team Y’s average run rate (runs per over) been 50% higher, the scores would have been tied in 12 overs. How many runs were scored by Team X?
The price (p) of a commodity is first increased by k%; then decreased by k%; again increased by k%; and again decreased by k%. If the new price is q, then what is the relation between p and q?
Which one of the following statements best reflects the most logical, rational and pragmatic message conveyed by the author of the passage?
Which one of the following statements best reflects the critical message conveyed by the author of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. No country needs to depend on ecosystems to boost national income.
II. Resource-rich countries need to share their resources with those of scant resources so as to prevent the degradation of ecosystems.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Which one of the following statements best reflects the central idea of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. Path-dependent green investments will eventually most likely benefit growth as well as public finances in a country like India.
II. If other green technologies follow the same pattern as that of solar energy, there will most likely be an easy green transition.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Three prime numbers p, q and r, each less than 20, are such that p − q = q − r. How many distinct possible values can we get for (p + q + r)?