Which of the following statements are logically equivalent?
A. Some cricketers are kind men.
B. Some kind men are cricketers.
C. Some cricketers are not non-kind men.
D. Some non-kind men are not non-cricketers.
Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
A, B and C only
We test logical equivalence using two rules of traditional categorical logic: conversion and obversion.
Statement A: "Some cricketers are kind men" is a particular affirmative statement.
Rule 1 - Conversion: For any particular affirmative statement of the form "Some X are Y", simply swapping the two terms gives an equivalent statement "Some Y are X" (this is called simple conversion, and it is always valid for particular affirmative statements). Applying this to A: "Some cricketers are kind men" becomes "Some kind men are cricketers" — which is exactly Statement B. So A and B are logically equivalent.
Rule 2 - Obversion: For any statement, you can obtain an equivalent statement by changing it from affirmative to negative (or negative to affirmative) and replacing the predicate term with its opposite/complement. For a particular affirmative statement "Some X are Y", the obverse is "Some X are not non-Y". Applying this to A: "Some cricketers are kind men" obverts to "Some cricketers are not non-kind men" — which is exactly Statement C. So A and C are logically equivalent.
Since A is equivalent to both B and C, all three — A, B, and C — are logically equivalent to each other.
Now check Statement D: "Some non-kind men are not non-cricketers". Obverting this gives "Some non-kind men are cricketers". Converting this gives "Some cricketers are non-kind men", which talks about cricketers who are NOT kind. This is the opposite quality from Statement A ("Some cricketers ARE kind men"), so D is a different statement and is not part of the equivalence group.
Therefore, only A, B and C are logically equivalent
In a square of opposition, if 'No animals with horns are carnivores' is false, which of the following is the correct code?
codes:
A. 'Some animals with horns are carnivores' is true.
B. 'Some animals with horns are not carnivores' is true.
C. 'All animals with horns are carnivores' is false
D. 'All the animals with horns are carnivores' is undermined.
Which of the following statements is contrary to the statement- "No football players are kind-hearted human beings"?
If the statement-"Some athletes are kind human beings" is given as true, then which of the following statements can be immediately inferred to be false?
Which of the following statements is contradictory to the statement - "Some birds are mammals"?
If the statement - "Some animals are not birds" is given as false, then which of the following statements can be immediately inferred to be false?
Which of the following is contrary to the statement "No mammals are birds"?
If the statement "Some animals are birds" is given as false then which of the following statements can be immediately inferred to be false?
Which of the following propositions can be directly inferred from the statement - "All mammals are four-legged animals?
Which of the following statements are contradictory to each other?
A. All objects are perishable.
B. Some objects are not perishable.
C. Some objects are perishable.
D. No objects are perishable.
Choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below:
Which of the following statements is contradictory to the statement-" all dogs are friendly animals" ?
Which of the following statements are so related that they can not both be true but could both be false?
A. All Biologists are outstanding teachers.
B. Some Biologists are outstanding teachers.
C. No Biologists are outstanding teachers.
D. Some Biologists are not outstanding teachers.
Choose the correct answer from the options given below: