Which of the following statement about a satellite orbiting around the earth is correct?
Satellite does not require any energy for orbiting.
Understanding Satellite Orbits and Energy Requirements
The question asks about the energy requirements for a satellite orbiting the Earth. Let's analyze the options to understand what keeps a satellite in its path around the planet.
Analyzing the Options:
-
Option 1: Satellite is kept in orbit by remote control from ground station
This statement is incorrect. Remote control from ground stations is used to monitor, communicate with, and command the satellite (e.g., orienting solar panels, operating instruments, performing maneuvers), but it does not provide the force or energy needed to keep the satellite in orbit. Orbit is maintained by natural forces. -
Option 2: Satellite is kept in orbit by retro-rocket and solar energy keeps it moving around the earth
This statement is incorrect. Retro-rockets are typically used to slow down a satellite, for example, to lower its orbit or initiate re-entry into the atmosphere. They are not used to maintain orbital velocity. Solar energy is collected by solar panels to power the satellite's internal systems (communications, instruments, computers), but it is not the energy that keeps the satellite in continuous motion around the Earth. -
Option 3: Satellite requires energy from solar panels and solid fuels for orbiting
This statement is incorrect. As mentioned, solar panels power the satellite's systems. Solid fuels or other propellants are used in thrusters for orbital maneuvers (like changing altitude or inclination) or station-keeping (making small corrections to stay in a specific orbit). These are not continuously fired to maintain the orbit itself. The primary force keeping the satellite in orbit is gravity, which does not require continuous energy input from the satellite. -
Option 4: Satellite does not require any energy for orbiting.
This statement is essentially correct regarding the energy required to *maintain* the orbital motion itself in an ideal scenario (neglecting atmospheric drag, which is only significant in very low orbits). Once a satellite is launched to the correct altitude and given the necessary tangential velocity, it falls towards the Earth while simultaneously moving forward at such a speed that it continuously misses the Earth. This state of continuous freefall is an orbit. The gravitational force provides the necessary centripetal force, and the satellite's inertia keeps it moving. No continuous energy input is needed to sustain this motion against gravity. The total mechanical energy (sum of kinetic and potential energy) of the satellite in orbit remains relatively constant in the absence of external forces like drag or thrust. Energy is required *to reach* the orbit (during launch) and for any subsequent maneuvers, but not simply to *be* in orbit.
Therefore, the most accurate statement is that the satellite does not require continuous energy input specifically for the act of orbiting itself once it has achieved a stable orbit.
Similar Questions
Two bodies of mass M each are placed R distance apart. In another system, two bodies of mass 2M each are placed R/2 distance apart. If F be the gravitational force between the bodies in the first system, then the gravitational force between the bodies in the second system will be
LIGO stands for
In a vacuum, a five-rupee coin, a feather of a sparrow bird and a mango are dropped simultaneously from the same height. The time taken by them to reach the bottom is t 1, t 2and t 3respectively. In this situation, we will observe that
If radius of the earth were to shrink by 1%, its mass remains the same, g would decrease by nearly
A planet has a mass M 1and radius R 1. The value of acceleration due to gravity on its surface is g 1. There is another planet 2, whose mass and radius both are two times that of the first planet. Which one of the following is the acceleration due to gravity on the surface of planet 2?
Suppose there are two planets, 1 and 2, having the same density but their radii are R 1and R 2respectively, where R 1> R 2. The accelerations due to gravity on the surface of these planets are related as
‘Black hole’ is a
Which one of the following statement is true for the relation, \(F= \frac{{G{m_1}{m_2}}}{{{r^2}}}\) ?
(All symbols have their usual meanings)The radius of the Moon is about one-fourth that of the Earth and acceleration due to gravity on the moon is about one-sixth that on the earth. From this, we can conclude that the ratio of the mass of earth to the mass of the moon is about
Suppose the force of gravitation between two bodies of equal masses is F. If each mass is doubled keeping the distance of separation between them unchanged, the force would become
Important Questions from Gravitation
The known forces of nature can be divided into four classes, viz., gravity, electromagnetism, weak nuclear force and strong nuclear force. With reference to them, which one of the following statements is not correct?
- A spacecraft of mass m = 1000 kg has a fully reflecting sail that is oriented perpendicular to the direction of the sun. The sun radiates 10 26 W and has a mass M = 10 30 kg. Ignoring the effect of the planets, for the gravitational pull of the sun to balance the radiation pressure on the sail, the area of the sail will be
The force of attraction between two bodies separated by a distance of d is F. The distance for which the force of attraction between them is 64 F is ________.
If two satellites of masses m1 and m2 are revolving around a earth in a circular orbits of radius r1 and r2, then the ratio of their orbital velocities \(\dfrac{v_1}{v_2}\) is
A women whose mass is 60 kg on the earth surface is in an spacecraft at an altitude of two times the earth radius. Her mass there is
