Which of the following is NOT correct about the eligibility criteria for being elected as Vice President of India?
He/She should be qualified for election as a member of the Lok Sabha.
Understanding Vice President Eligibility in India
The question asks us to identify the statement that is NOT correct regarding the eligibility criteria for election as the Vice President of India. Let's examine the constitutional requirements for this office.
Eligibility Criteria for Vice President of India
According to Article 66 of the Constitution of India, a person is eligible for election as Vice President if he or she:
- Is a citizen of India.
- Has completed the age of thirty-five years.
- Is qualified for election as a member of the Council of States (Rajya Sabha).
- Does not hold any office of profit under the Union Government, any State Government, any local authority, or any other public authority.
Analyzing the Given Options
Now, let's compare the provided options with the constitutional requirements:
- He/She should be a citizen of India.
This statement aligns perfectly with the constitutional requirement. Being a citizen of India is mandatory for election as Vice President.
- He/She should have completed 35 years of age.
This statement also matches the constitutional requirement. The minimum age for holding the office of Vice President is 35 years.
- He/She should not hold any office of profit under the Union Government/state government or any subordinate local authority.
This statement accurately reflects another constitutional requirement. Holding an office of profit disqualifies a person from being elected as Vice President.
- He/She should be qualified for election as a member of the Lok Sabha.
This statement is NOT correct. The Constitution requires the Vice President to be qualified for election as a member of the Rajya Sabha (Council of States), not the Lok Sabha (House of the People). Qualification for the Lok Sabha is a requirement for the President of India.
Based on the analysis, the statement that is NOT correct about the eligibility criteria for being elected as Vice President of India is the requirement to be qualified for election as a member of the Lok Sabha.
| Eligibility Point | Vice President Requirement | Correct/Incorrect in Option 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Citizenship | Citizen of India | Covered in Option 1 (Correct) |
| Age | 35 years | Covered in Option 2 (Correct) |
| Office of Profit | Should not hold | Covered in Option 3 (Correct) |
| Qualification for Parliament | Qualified for Rajya Sabha | Option 4 says Lok Sabha (Incorrect) |
Conclusion
The eligibility criteria for the Vice President of India are clearly defined in the Constitution. While being a citizen, being 35 years old, and not holding an office of profit are correct requirements, being qualified for the Lok Sabha is not. The correct requirement is qualification for the Rajya Sabha.
Revision Table: Vice President Election Key Points
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Constitutional Article | Article 63-73 primarily |
| Eligibility Criteria (Art 66) | Citizen of India, 35 years of age, Qualified for Rajya Sabha, Not holding office of profit |
| Electoral College (Art 66) | Members of both Houses of Parliament (Lok Sabha & Rajya Sabha) |
| Method of Election | Proportional Representation by means of the single transferable vote |
| Term of Office | 5 years |
Additional Information: President vs. Vice President Eligibility
It's important to distinguish between the eligibility requirements for the President and the Vice President of India:
- President: Must be qualified for election as a member of the Lok Sabha.
- Vice President: Must be qualified for election as a member of the Rajya Sabha.
This difference reflects their respective roles; the Vice President serves as the ex-officio Chairman of the Rajya Sabha, hence the requirement to be qualified for that house. The President, as the head of state, needs to be qualified for the popular house (Lok Sabha).
An "office of profit" is generally understood as a position that brings to the person holding it some financial gain or advantage. The Parliament can declare certain offices as not being offices of profit.
Similar Questions
The Parliament of India consists of ______.
The power to summon the Houses of the Parliament is vested with the ______.
Which of the following pairs is/are correctly matched regarding the terminology used in the Parliament?
A. Appropriation Bill - A Money Bill passed for providing for the withdrawal or appropriation from and out of the Consolidated Fund of India
B. Demand for Grants - Earmarking of budgetary allocation for meeting only planned expenditure of a Ministry/Department
C. Short Duration Discussion - For raising a discussion on a matter of urgent public importance for which a notice has to be given by a Member and supported by 50 Members
Who administers oath of office to the Vice President of India?
The Chairman of a State Public Service Commission can be removed by the order of the ________.
Who, being the Commander-in-Chief of the Indian Armed Forces, takes the salute of various regiments of the Armed Forces during the march-past on the occasion of Republic Day?
The President of India _____ inaugurated Sangeet Natak Academi on 28 January 1953.
A bill becomes an Act of the Parliament after being passed by both the houses of Parliament and assented to by the ______.
Who among the following appoints the Speaker 'Pro tem' of the Lok Sabha?
Who among the following replaced Morarji Desai as the Prime Minister of India in 1979?
Important Questions from Central Government
Who appoints the Chief Election Commissioner of India?
What is correct about the dismissal of Deputy Chairman of Rajya Sabha ?
i. He can be dismissed by no-confidence motion
ii. To introduce such resolution prior notice of 14 days is essential
iii. Such resolution should be passed by absolute majority
iv. Such resolution should be passed by a majority of the ten members of the house
What is correct ?
i. Finance Bill can be introduced in Lok Sabha only
ii. Rajya Sabha can detain the Finance Bill
If the Vice President removed from his office, what shall happened?
Consider the following statements :
1. In India, there is no law restricting the candidates from contesting in one Lok Sabha election from three constituencies.
2. In 1991 Lok Sabha Election, Shri Devi Lal contested from three Lok Sabha constituencies.
3. As per the- existing rules, if a candidate contests in one Lok Sabha election from many constituencies, his/her party should bear the cost of bye elections to the constituencies vacated by him/her in the event of him/her winning in all the constituencies.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
