Read the passage and answer the questions: "Normal science, the activity in which most scientists inevitably spend almost all their time, is based on the assumption that the scientific community knows what the world is like. Scientists take great pains to defend that assumption, often restricting their vision to the phenomena that the existing paradigm has defined as relevant. When research proceeds in this fashion, findings tend to be incremental, reinforcing the established framework rather than challenging it. Yet, over time, anomalies—empirical observations that cannot be explained within the current paradigm—accumulate. Initially, these anomalies are dismissed as errors or as problems to be solved within the existing theoretical structure. However, as these anomalies grow in number and significance, they begin to erode confidence in the prevailing paradigm. The resolution of such crises is not a straightforward process of falsification, as Popper might suggest, but rather a transformation in the very way scientists see the world. Scientific revolutions occur when a new paradigm emerges—one that is not merely an extension of the old but a fundamental reconceptualization of reality. This shift is not purely logical or empirical; it involves a radical change in perspective, akin to a gestalt switch. The Copernican Revolution, for example, did not merely adjust astronomical calculations; it redefined the very framework through which celestial motion was understood. Similarly, Einstein's theory of relativity did not just modify Newtonian mechanics but replaced its foundational assumptions about space and time."
What type of clause is used in the sentence: "Yet, over time, anomalies that cannot be explained within the current paradigm accumulate."
Relative clause
Relative clause is correct.
A relative clause begins with a relative pronoun such as who, which or that and describes the noun just before it.
In "Yet, over time, anomalies that cannot be explained within the current paradigm accumulate", the clause "that cannot be explained within the current paradigm" begins with "that" and tells us which anomalies are meant. It modifies the noun "anomalies", so it is a relative (adjective) clause.
It is not a noun clause, because it does not act as a subject or object. It is not an adverbial clause, because it does not show time, reason or condition for the verb "accumulate". It is not independent, because it cannot stand alone as a complete statement.
Similar Questions
The main theme of this passage is:
Which statement sums up the concluding idea of the passage?
Which of the following would the writer describe as ‘botanical torture’?
According to the passage why do mustard plants send signals?
Which of the following types of responses of the Venus flytrap does the passage refer to?
What, according to the passage, is a possible way to manage the large carbon foot-print caused by the fast-food industry?
Which of the following sums up the central idea of the passage?
Select the most appropriate meaning of ‘fastidious’ from the following options.
Select the synonym of ‘dependence’ from the passage.
Who was understanding, clever, haughty and reserved?
Important Questions from Reading Comprehension
What is the meaning of ‘intrigued’?
What are ice shelves?
What are icebergs?
When the iceberg turns upside down, it appears ________.
The use of science in its simple form has helped man to ____________
