What are the causes of industrial backwardness in India? Critically evaluate the role of the New Industrial Policy, announced in July 1991, towards correcting such backwardness.
India's industrial backwardness prior to the early 1990s was the result of multiple structural and policy-related factors. A major cause was the ‘License Raj’, a cumbersome system of permits and approvals that stifled entrepreneurship and created barriers for new firms, leading to inefficiency, limited competition, and slow industrial diversification. The dominant role of the public sector often resulted in underperforming enterprises burdened by bureaucratic hurdles, overstaffing, and lack of accountability, diverting resources from more productive uses. Infrastructure deficits, particularly in power and transport, increased production costs and hindered timely delivery. Additionally, a small domestic market due to low per capita income restricted large-scale industrial expansion and economies of scale.
The New Industrial Policy (NIP) of July 1991 marked a paradigm shift. It significantly reduced industrial licensing, abolishing it for most industries and allowing firms greater freedom to invest and expand. The policy reduced public sector monopoly, reserving only a few strategic areas while opening other sectors for private participation. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) was encouraged through automatic approval routes, bringing capital, technology, and management expertise. Trade liberalization, including lower import tariffs and removal of quantitative restrictions, exposed Indian industries to global competition, compelling efficiency, innovation, and modernization.
While the NIP accelerated industrial growth and diversification, it also posed challenges. Sudden exposure to global competition adversely affected some domestic industries, causing job losses in traditional sectors. Concerns about foreign dominance, market volatility, and neglect of small-scale industries were also raised.
On balance, the NIP was pivotal in correcting industrial backwardness by freeing private enterprise, promoting competition, and integrating India into the global economy. It laid the foundation for a more dynamic industrial landscape, fostering efficiency, innovation, and sustained industrial growth while gradually addressing the structural constraints that had long hindered India’s industrial development and global competitiveness.
Answered By:
Distinguish between the Zamindari system and the Ryotwari system of land revenue under the British rule in India.
What were the economic consequences of the Drain of Wealth' theory as practised during the British rule in India? Analyse.
What were the major impacts of 'commercialisation of agriculture' on Indian farmers during the pre-Independence India? Discuss.
Critically analyse the constraints of public and private capital formation in Indian agriculture.
Examine the objectives and components of the Green Revolution in India.
What were the thrust areas of economic planning during the pre-liberalisation era? Discuss.
Is land reform necessary to improve agricultural productivity in India? Discuss.
Why did the British lead to the destruction of India's traditional cotton industry? Discuss.
Describe the phases of colonisation in British India.
Why does inter-State disparity in income persist in India despite plethora of development initiatives undertaken by the Government of India? Analyse.
Write a note in 150 words
Mendelian and non-Mendelian traits.
Write a note in 150 words
Theoretical significance of Purum kinship-system.
Write a note in 150 words
Smell as a signal among non-human primates.
Write a note in 150 words
Osteodontokeratik culture and its makers.
Discuss the Miocene hominoid remains and their significance in evolution.