The Vernacular Press Act allowed
More than one of the above
The Act allowed both of the penalties described in options 1 and 3, so the answer is “more than one of the above” — option 4.
What the Act provided. Passed in 1878 under Lord Lytton, the Vernacular Press Act was aimed squarely at newspapers in Indian languages. Its machinery was :
| Provision |
|---|
| A district magistrate could require the printer and publisher of a vernacular paper to enter into a bond, undertaking not to publish anything likely to excite disaffection |
| He could demand a security deposit, which was forfeited on a breach — a seizure of the paper’s assets, as option 1 describes |
| On a further offence the press and its equipment could themselves be seized and confiscated — as option 3 describes |
| The magistrate’s decision was final; there was no appeal to a court of law |
| A paper could escape the Act by submitting proofs to a government censor before publication |
Why option 4 is right. The Act did not provide a single penalty but a graded set of them. The deposit and its forfeiture struck at the paper’s money; the confiscation of the press struck at its ability to print at all. Both are accurate descriptions of powers the Act conferred, so options 1 and 3 are each true and neither can be preferred over the other — which is exactly what the last option is there to express.
Why option 2 fails. It reverses the sense entirely, providing for punishment where nothing objectionable was published. That is the one statement in the list that describes no power the Act ever contained, and recognising it as nonsense is the first step in answering.
Why it was called the “Gagging Act”. It applied only to Indian-language papers and not to the English press, so it drew an open racial distinction; and the absence of any appeal put editors entirely at the mercy of an executive officer.
What happened. The Amrita Bazar Patrika, then published in Bengali, escaped the Act by turning itself into an English paper overnight. Protest against the measure was so strong that it became a rallying point for early nationalist opinion, and Lord Ripon repealed it in 1882.
The wider sequence of press laws : the Censorship of Press Act 1799 under Wellesley, the Licensing Regulations of 1823, Metcalfe’s liberation of the press in 1835, the Licensing Act of 1857, the Vernacular Press Act 1878, the Newspapers Act 1908, the Indian Press Act 1910 and the Press (Emergency Powers) Act 1931.
Hence, the answer is More than one of the above.
Similar Questions
When did Britishers shifted the capital to Delhi ?
Which of the following was not one of the features of the Government of India Act, 1935 ?
Under the Royal Titles Act, Queen Victoria became the empress of India in
When did Macaulay issue his famous minute on Indian Education ?
Important Questions from Changes in Indian Administration after 1858
British East India Company was liquidated by which law?
In which year was the Central Province formed?
The British parliament transferred the powers of east India company to the British crown in ________.
By which Indian Council Act Indian people were admitted to the Legislative activities of India?
The phrase 'Kimberly Clause' was used in which of the following Acts?
