Speaker's Authority on Money Bills
The Constitution of India designates a specific authority to determine if a bill qualifies as a Money Bill. This classification is crucial as it affects the legislative process, particularly the powers of the Rajya Sabha.
Defining a Money Bill
- A bill is considered a Money Bill if it exclusively contains provisions dealing with the matters listed under Article 110(1) of the Constitution. These include:
- Imposition, abolition, remission, or regulation of any tax.
- The regulation of the borrowing of money or the giving of any guarantee by the Government of India.
- The custody of the Consolidated Fund of India or the Contingency Fund of India.
- The appropriation of moneys out of the Consolidated Fund of India.
- Declaring any expenditure to be charged on the Consolidated Fund of India or increasing the amount of any such expenditure.
- The receipt of money on account of the Consolidated Fund of India or the public account of India or the custody or issue of such moneys, or the audit of the accounts of the Union or of a State.
- Any other matter incidental to any of the above matters.
Final Decision Power
The ultimate authority to decide whether a bill is a Money Bill or not rests with the Speaker of the Lok Sabha.
- After a bill is passed by the Lok Sabha, the Speaker certifies it as a Money Bill.
- This decision by the Speaker is final and cannot be questioned in either House of Parliament or by any court.
- While the President summons joint sessions, the Speaker's role in certifying a bill as a Money Bill is independent.
Other Roles Clarified
- President of India: While the President's assent is required for any bill to become law, they do not decide if a bill is a Money Bill. The President can only recommend certain financial bills for introduction.
- Chairman of the Rajya Sabha: The Chairman presides over the Rajya Sabha. While the Rajya Sabha discusses Money Bills, its power is limited; it cannot amend Money Bills, only suggest amendments, which the Lok Sabha may or may not accept. The Chairman does not certify Money Bills.
- Governor of the Reserve Bank of India: The RBI Governor heads the central bank and has no role in classifying parliamentary bills.
Therefore, the Speaker of the Lok Sabha is the sole authority for declaring a bill as a Money Bill.
Similar Questions
- Which of the following is NOT true regarding the President of India?
- Who administers the oath to the President of India?
- The upper house of Indian parliament is:
- What is the total strength of elected members in the Lok Sabha?
- As of October 2020, who is the Vice President of India?
- When was the Planning Commission of India dissolved by the Union Government of India?
- Who is the first chairperson of the NITI Aayog?
- As per Constitution of India, if for a period of ______ days a member of either House of Parliament is, without permission of the House, absent from all meetings thereof, the House may declare his seat vacant.
- Who was appointed as the first woman speaker of the Lok Sabha?
- The constitutional head of the Executive of the Union of India is the:
Important Questions from Central Government
Who appoints the Chief Election Commissioner of India?
What is correct about the dismissal of Deputy Chairman of Rajya Sabha ?
i. He can be dismissed by no-confidence motion
ii. To introduce such resolution prior notice of 14 days is essential
iii. Such resolution should be passed by absolute majority
iv. Such resolution should be passed by a majority of the ten members of the house
What is correct ?
i. Finance Bill can be introduced in Lok Sabha only
ii. Rajya Sabha can detain the Finance Bill
If the Vice President removed from his office, what shall happened?
Consider the following statements :
1. In India, there is no law restricting the candidates from contesting in one Lok Sabha election from three constituencies.
2. In 1991 Lok Sabha Election, Shri Devi Lal contested from three Lok Sabha constituencies.
3. As per the- existing rules, if a candidate contests in one Lok Sabha election from many constituencies, his/her party should bear the cost of bye elections to the constituencies vacated by him/her in the event of him/her winning in all the constituencies.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
