This solution addresses the calculation of the difference between the largest wavelengths of the Paschen and Balmer series for hydrogen, referencing the provided Lyman series data.
The hydrogen spectrum is categorized into series based on the final energy level ($n_1$) of electron transitions:
The wavelength ($\lambda$) of emitted light is determined by the Rydberg formula:
$ \frac{1}{\lambda} = RZ^2 \left( \frac{1}{n_1^2} - \frac{1}{n_2^2} \right) $
For hydrogen, the atomic number $Z=1$. $R$ is the Rydberg constant. $n_2$ is the principal quantum number of the initial energy level, and $n_1$ is the principal quantum number of the final energy level ($n_2 > n_1$).
The largest wavelength ($\lambda_{\text{max}}$) in any series corresponds to the smallest energy difference between levels. This occurs for the transition where the electron drops from the level immediately above the final level, i.e., $n_2 = n_1 + 1$.
The difference between the largest wavelengths of the Paschen and Balmer series is:
$ \Delta \lambda = \lambda_{\text{max, Paschen}} - \lambda_{\text{max, Balmer}} = \frac{144}{7R} - \frac{36}{5R} $
To simplify, find a common denominator:
$ \Delta \lambda = \frac{1}{R} \left( \frac{144 \times 5 - 36 \times 7}{35} \right) = \frac{1}{R} \left( \frac{720 - 252}{35} \right) = \frac{468}{35R} $
The question provides the smallest wavelength of the Lyman series ($\lambda_{\text{min, Lyman}}$) as 91 nm. This corresponds to the transition $n_2=2 \to n_1=1$.
$ \frac{1}{\lambda_{\text{min, Lyman}}} = R \left( \frac{1}{1^2} - \frac{1}{2^2} \right) = R \left( 1 - \frac{1}{4} \right) = R \left( \frac{3}{4} \right) $
Using the given value $\lambda_{\text{min, Lyman}} = 91 \, \text{nm}$:
$ \frac{1}{91 \, \text{nm}} = R \left( \frac{3}{4} \right) $
This implies the value of $1/R$ is:
$ \frac{1}{R} = 91 \, \text{nm} \times \frac{4}{3} = \frac{364}{3} \, \text{nm} \approx 121.33 \, \text{nm} $
Substituting this into the difference formula:
$ \Delta \lambda = \frac{468}{35} \times \left( \frac{364}{3} \right) \, \text{nm} \approx 1621 \, \text{nm} $
Note on Discrepancy: The calculation derived directly from the provided 91 nm value yields approximately 1621 nm. Standard calculations using the widely accepted Rydberg constant value result in a difference of approximately 1219 nm (closest to Option 2). The provided correct answer is Option D (1550 nm). Due to these significant inconsistencies between the given data, standard physical constants, the options, and the designated answer, a definitive step-by-step derivation reaching 1550 nm is not possible under standard interpretation.
Assuming in forward bias condition there is a voltage drop of $0.7 \text{ V}$ across a silicon diode, the current through diode $D_1$ in the circuit is ________$\text{mA}$.
(Assume all diodes in the given circuit are identical)

Find the correct combination of A, B, C and D inputs which can cause the LED to glow.

The correct truth table for the given input data of the following logic gate is :
Assuming in forward bias condition there is a voltage drop of $0.7 \text{ V}$ across a silicon diode, the current through diode $D_1$ in the circuit is ________$\text{mA}$.
(Assume all diodes in the given circuit are identical)

Find the correct combination of A, B, C and D inputs which can cause the LED to glow.
