The question asks about the core principle of the Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility when a consumer consumes increasing quantities of a specific commodity.
To understand this law, let's define the key terms:
The Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility is a fundamental concept in microeconomics. It states that as a person increases their consumption of a good or service, the marginal utility gained from each successive unit of that product will eventually decrease, assuming all other factors remain constant. In simpler terms, while consuming more generally increases total satisfaction, the amount of *extra* satisfaction you get from each additional item tends to get smaller.
For example, imagine eating slices of pizza. The first slice might give you immense satisfaction (high marginal utility). The second slice is still good, but perhaps slightly less satisfying than the first (lower marginal utility). By the fifth or sixth slice, you might feel quite full, and the additional satisfaction from eating another slice could be very small, or even negative if you feel sick!
Let's look at why the other options are incorrect based on this law:
Based on the definition and explanation, the Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility clearly indicates that the satisfaction gained from each subsequent unit consumed will decrease.
| Column A (Laws) | Column B (Descriptions) |
| A. Law of Demand | 1. After a certain point, increasing input leads to declining marginal product. |
| B. Law of Diminishing Marginal Product | 2. Demand and price move in opposite directions when income increases. |
| C. Law of Variable Proportions | 3. Marginal product initially rises with input usage, then falls. |
Which of the following statements is NOT correct about the factors that gave rise to the Consumer Movement in India?
The total value of goods and services traded is considered to be the _________ of trade.
Microfinance programmes were first created by Nobel prize winning Economist Muhummad Yunus in what decade?
Which of the following statements is NOT true about the two-sector model?
What happens in case of market equilibrium:
(a) Market demand = market supply
(b) There is no excess supply in the market