Assuming that the data given in the statement are definitely true which of the following conclusions can be logically deducted. Statement: Students who complete the summer program receive priority registration. David received priority registration. What can we infer about David?
David might have completed the summer program
This is a statement-and-conclusion question, so the rule is simple: we may accept only what necessarily follows from the given statement, treating the statement as definitely true.
The statement gives a one-way (conditional) rule: if a student completes the summer program, then that student receives priority registration. It tells us what completing the program guarantees.
The extra fact given is that David received priority registration. Notice this is the result part of the rule, not the cause part.
A conditional rule cannot be run backwards. "Completing the program" guarantees priority registration, but the statement never claims completion is the only way to earn it; some other students could also get priority registration for reasons not mentioned here.
So from David having priority registration we cannot be certain he completed the summer program. Option 1 overstates the case, and options 3 and 4 (senior student, registered early) bring in facts the statement never supplies.
The most we can safely say is that completing the program is one possible reason for David's priority registration, so it may or may not be true of him.
Hence the only logically valid inference is David might have completed the summer program.
Similar Questions
Here some problem or solution of the problem is given in the statement you have to choose the appropriate logical deduction for given statement.
Statement:
Urban areas have expanded rapidly, but public transport has not kept pace. As a result, traffic congestion and air pollution have increased. Experts recommend massive investments in metro lines, electric buses, and last-mile connectivity to address urban mobility challenges.
Conclusions:
I. The lack of adequate public transport contributes to pollution in cities.
II. Improving public transport can reduce urban mobility problems.
III. Urban growth is always a negative phenomenon.
Which conclusion necessarily follows?
Read the following statement carefully and identify the inference that follows.
Statement: The TCS company has decided to lay off 1000 employees due to financial losses.
Inference:
I. The company is facing financial difficulties.
II. The employees who were laid off were not performing well.
III. The company will be able to recover from its financial losses after the layoffs.
Based on the statement(s) given below, choose the best possible conclusion(s) that follows:
Statements:
Only candidates with 7 or above years of experience in marketing can apply for the post; otherwise, their applications will be rejected.
Conclusions:
I. Only candidates with an MBA degree in marketing can apply.
II. Applications of candidates with 6 years of experience in marketing will not be considered for the post.
Some conditional data is provided to you in form of statement you have to check which of the following statement are logically inference from given statement.
Statement: Every doctor who works at City Hospital has completed a residency program. Dr. Smith works at City Hospital. What can we infer about Dr. Smith?
Some conditional data is provided to you in form of statement you have to check which of the following statement are logically inference from given statement.
The email from the company's HR department had the subject line "Important Updates to Employee Benefits" and was marked as high priority. All employees received it simultaneously at 9 AM on a Monday. What can you infer?
Read the following statement carefully and identify the inference that follows.
Statement: The government has announced a new policy to reduce carbon emissions by 50% in the next 10 years.
Inference:
I. The government is taking steps to combat climate change.
II. The new policy will have no impact on the environment.
III. The government is not interested in reducing carbon emissions.
Important Questions from Statement and Conclusions
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
All cats are bills.
No snakes are bills.
All snakes are dolls.
Conclusions:
(I) Some dolls are not cats.
(II) No bills are dolls.- Select the conclusion, from among the following options, which logically follows from the given statement.
Statement:
One must work hard to be successful in life. - Read the given statement and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statement:
Doing exercises in the morning is good for health.
Conclusion 1:
Health can be maintained by doing exercises only.
Conclusion 2:
Without doing exercises, people will become ill. - Read the given statements and conclusions carefully and select the conclusion(s) that logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
Indian Education is lacking quality due to low funds. India is allocating additional funds to education sector.
Conclusions:
I. There would be improvement in quality of education in India.
II. Only funds can improve the education standards. - In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.
Statement:
If A was there in XYZ cricket team, XYZ would have been the invincible team in the world.
Conclusion:
I. Without A, XYZ cannot win.
II. A is more talented than anyone else in the XYZ cricket team
