Statements:
Indian Education is lacking quality due to low funds. India is allocating additional funds to education sector.
Conclusions:
I. There would be improvement in quality of education in India.
II. Only funds can improve the education standards.
This section provides a step-by-step analysis to determine which conclusions logically follow from the given statements about Indian education quality and funding.
We assess each conclusion based on its logical validity derived from the statements:
This conclusion follows logically. Statement 1 establishes a cause (low funds) for a problem (lacking quality). Statement 2 indicates that this cause is being addressed (additional funds allocated). Therefore, it is reasonable to infer a potential improvement in quality.
This conclusion does not follow. The statements imply funds are important, but they do not claim funds are the *only* factor. Education quality depends on multiple factors (e.g., teaching, curriculum). The word "Only" makes this an unsupported absolute statement.
Only Conclusion I logically follows from the provided statements.
Read the given statement and conclusions carefully and decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statement.
Statement:
The book 'P' emphasizes only on population of India and its related problems during 2001-2015.
Conclusions:
I. Increasing population is the biggest problem in India.
II. The book is the only book which deals with the problem of population in India.
Read the given statement and conclusions carefully and decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statement.
Statement:
The patient who was brought to the emergency during the last night would have survived if the surgery was done sometime before.
Conclusions:
I. Surgery was the only option for survival.
II. Patient was brought to the hospital late.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
All cats are bills.
No snakes are bills.
All snakes are dolls.
Conclusions:
(I) Some dolls are not cats.
(II) No bills are dolls.