Read the given statement and conclusions carefully and decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statement. Statement: The patient who was brought to the emergency during the last night would have survived if the surgery was done sometime before. Conclusions: I. Surgery was the only option for survival.
II. Patient was brought to the hospital late.
The question asks to determine which conclusion logically follows from the given statement.
Statement Analysis
Statement: "The patient who was brought to the emergency during the last night would have survived if the surgery was done sometime before."
- This statement establishes a condition for survival: surgery needed to be performed sometime before the critical point.
- It implies that the surgery, if performed timely, would have led to survival.
Conclusion I Evaluation
Conclusion I: "Surgery was the only option for survival."
- The statement directly links survival to the performance of surgery ("would have survived if the surgery was done").
- This strongly implies that surgery was the necessary intervention required for the patient's survival in this specific context. While not explicitly stating it was the *only* possibility in all scenarios, within the logic derived from the statement, it represents the key factor for survival.
- Therefore, Conclusion I logically follows from the statement.
Conclusion II Evaluation
Conclusion II: "Patient was brought to the hospital late."
- The statement mentions the patient arrived "during the last night" and that survival depended on surgery done "sometime before."
- This suggests that the necessary surgery was not performed prior to the critical point reached by "last night."
- However, the statement does not provide information about the *optimal* time for arrival or compare the patient's arrival time ("last night") to that optimal window. "Late" is a relative term. The delay might have been in performing the surgery after arrival, or the condition might have progressed rapidly, making arrival time less critical than the actual surgery timing.
- We cannot definitively conclude that the patient was brought to the hospital late based solely on the provided information. The statement focuses on the timing of the surgery relative to survival, not necessarily the timing of the *arrival* relative to optimal treatment.
- Therefore, Conclusion II does not logically follow from the statement.
Final Decision
Based on the analysis, only Conclusion I logically follows from the given statement.
Similar Questions
- Select the conclusion, from among the following options, which logically follows from the given statement.
Statement:
One must work hard to be successful in life. - Read the given statement and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statement:
Doing exercises in the morning is good for health.
Conclusion 1:
Health can be maintained by doing exercises only.
Conclusion 2:
Without doing exercises, people will become ill. - Read the given statements and conclusions carefully and select the conclusion(s) that logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
Indian Education is lacking quality due to low funds. India is allocating additional funds to education sector.
Conclusions:
I. There would be improvement in quality of education in India.
II. Only funds can improve the education standards. - In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.
Statement:
If A was there in XYZ cricket team, XYZ would have been the invincible team in the world.
Conclusion:
I. Without A, XYZ cannot win.
II. A is more talented than anyone else in the XYZ cricket team - Read the given statement carefully and select from among the given options, the conclusion that logically follows from the statement.
Statement:
Ability is a poor man's wealth. - Read the given statement and conclusions carefully and decide which conclusion(s) is/are implicit in the statement.
Statement:
No nation is completely self-dependent these days.
Conclusions:
I. Citizens of the country have become lazy.
II. It is impossible to grow and produce all that a nation needs. - Read the given statements and conclusions carefully and decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
1. Lack of education is responsible for lower income of a state.
2. Bihar ranks very low in per capita income.
Conclusions:
I. Bihar has a lower rate of education.
II. Bihar is a very historic state. - Read the given statement and conclusions carefully and decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statement.
Statement:
Company ABC has the highest number of customers as compared to its competitors.
Conclusions:
1. Company ABC has 58% of the total customers.
2. Company ABC's products are the cheapest in the market. - Read the given statement and conclusions carefully and decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statement.
Statement:
Most students have charismatic personalities.
Conclusions:
1. Some students have charismatic personalities.
2. All students have charismatic personalities. Read the given statement and conclusions carefully and decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statement.
Statement:
The book 'P' emphasizes only on population of India and its related problems during 2001-2015.
Conclusions:
I. Increasing population is the biggest problem in India.
II. The book is the only book which deals with the problem of population in India.
Important Questions from Statement and Conclusions
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
All cats are bills.
No snakes are bills.
All snakes are dolls.
Conclusions:
(I) Some dolls are not cats.
(II) No bills are dolls.- Statement: Resilience supports recovery from setbacks, but without learning from mistakes, progress may stall.
Conclusion I: Resilience alone may not ensure progress.
Conclusion II: Learning from mistakes guarantees recovery.
Which conclusion follows? - Read the following statement carefully and identify the conclusion that follows.
Statement: "Government should provide free education to all children up to the age of 14."
Conclusions:
I. Education is a basic right of every child.
II. A large number of children are deprived of basic education. - Statement: Ethical behavior fosters trust, but profitability often relies on operational efficiency as well.
Conclusion I: Ethical behavior is not sufficient for profitability.
Conclusion II: Operational efficiency is required for trust.
Which conclusion follows? - Read the following statement carefully and identify the conclusion that follows.
Statement: "Online learning has increased student participation."
Conclusions:
I. Students did not participate in physical classes.
II. Technology helps in engaging students.
