Statement: "Government should provide free education to all children up to the age of 14."
Conclusions:
I. Education is a basic right of every child.
II. A large number of children are deprived of basic education.
Analyzing the Given Statement
The core statement provided is: "Government should provide free education to all children up to the age of 14." This statement suggests a policy or action the government ought to take regarding education.
Evaluating Conclusion I: Education as a Basic Right
Let's look at Conclusion I: "Education is a basic right of every child."
- The statement advocates for the government providing something universally and freely (education up to age 14).
- Such a strong recommendation for provision often stems from a belief that the service is fundamental or a right. If education wasn't considered essential or a right, the argument for the government mandating and funding it freely would be weaker.
- Therefore, the statement implies that the government recognizes education as a fundamental need for children, aligning with the idea that it is a basic right.
Evaluating Conclusion II: Addressing Educational Deprivation
Now let's consider Conclusion II: "A large number of children are deprived of basic education."
- Why would a government need to ensure *free* education? A primary reason is often that many children currently cannot access it, perhaps due to cost or lack of availability.
- The proposal for universal, free education up to a certain age suggests that the current system may not be reaching all children, or that financial barriers prevent many from attending.
- The statement implies a problem exists – that children are being deprived of this fundamental service – which necessitates government intervention like providing free education.
Connecting Conclusions to the Statement
Both conclusions logically follow from the statement:
- The call for government-provided free education (the statement) is based on the underlying principle that education is a right (Conclusion I).
- The specific proposal for *free* and universal access suggests that there is a current deficit or deprivation in access to education (Conclusion II).
Since both conclusions are reasonably inferred from the given statement, the most appropriate answer is that both conclusions I and II follow.
This corresponds to Option 4.
Important Questions from Statement and Conclusions
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
All cats are bills.
No snakes are bills.
All snakes are dolls.
Conclusions:
(I) Some dolls are not cats.
(II) No bills are dolls.- Statement: Resilience supports recovery from setbacks, but without learning from mistakes, progress may stall.
Conclusion I: Resilience alone may not ensure progress.
Conclusion II: Learning from mistakes guarantees recovery.
Which conclusion follows? - Statement: Ethical behavior fosters trust, but profitability often relies on operational efficiency as well.
Conclusion I: Ethical behavior is not sufficient for profitability.
Conclusion II: Operational efficiency is required for trust.
Which conclusion follows? - Read the following statement carefully and identify the conclusion that follows.
Statement: "Online learning has increased student participation."
Conclusions:
I. Students did not participate in physical classes.
II. Technology helps in engaging students. - S1: Failure is the stepping stone to success.
S2: Successive failures are not however successive stepping stones to success.
The second sentence:
