Right to privacy relating to self-identity is very dear to every human being and well protected under Article 21 of the Constitution. In this context, examine the effect of the amendment in 2026, to the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019.
The Puttaswamy (2017) judgment recognised informational self-determination — including gender identity — as intrinsic to Article 21. NALSA v. Union of India (2014) had already held that self-perceived gender identity is a facet of dignity and privacy.
The 2019 Act, however, retained a certification model requiring application to the District Magistrate, which was widely criticised as violating self-identification and creating a "screening" barrier.
The 2026 amendment, by aligning the certification framework more closely with self-declaration, has significant privacy implications:
Thus, while the amendment advances Article 21 protections, its promise depends on sensitised implementation, secure data handling, and horizontal enforcement against private discrimination.
Answered By:
Examine the need for electoral reforms as suggested by various committees with particular reference to "one nation one election" principle.
Explain and distinguish between Lok Adalats and Arbitration Tribunals. Whether they entertain civil as well as criminal cases?
"The growth of cabinet system has practically resulted in the marginalisation of the parliamentary supremacy.” Elucidate.
"The duty of the Comptroller and Auditor General is not merely to ensure the legality of expenditure but also its propriety.” Comment.
Analyse the role of local bodies in providing good governance at local level and bring out the pros and cons merging the rural local bodies with the urban local bodies.