Read the given statements and conclusions carefully and decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: (i) Some of the topics taught by my teacher are light, sound and electricity. (ii) None of the topics of magnetism and waves are taught by my teacher. (iii) All the topics taught by my teacher, except thermodynamics, are very comprehensible and interesting. Conclusions: (i) My teacher teaches the topic sound in a very interesting manner. (ii) Magnetism and thermodynamics are not taught by my teacher. (iii) The topic waves taught by my teacher is not very comprehensible.
Statement Analysis for Logic Reasoning
We are given three statements about the topics taught by a teacher and their characteristics. We need to determine which conclusions logically follow from these statements.
- Statement (i): The teacher teaches topics like light, sound, and electricity.
- Statement (ii): The teacher does not teach magnetism and waves.
- Statement (iii): All topics taught by the teacher, *except* thermodynamics, are very comprehensible and interesting. This implies that topics other than thermodynamics, if taught, are interesting and comprehensible. It also implies that thermodynamics might be taught, but potentially without being interesting or comprehensible (or it's the only exception).
Conclusion Analysis for Logic Reasoning MCQs
Let's analyze each conclusion based on the given statements:
Analysis of Conclusion (i)
Conclusion (i): My teacher teaches the topic sound in a very interesting manner.
- From Statement (i), we know the teacher teaches 'sound'.
- From Statement (iii), we know that all topics taught, *except* thermodynamics, are interesting.
- Since 'sound' is taught (Statement i) and 'sound' is not 'thermodynamics', it follows that 'sound' must be taught in an interesting manner.
- Therefore, conclusion (i) logically follows.
Analysis of Conclusion (ii)
Conclusion (ii): Magnetism and thermodynamics are not taught by my teacher.
- Statement (ii) explicitly states that 'magnetism' is not taught by the teacher. This part of the conclusion is correct.
- Statement (iii) mentions 'thermodynamics' as an exception to topics being comprehensible and interesting. The phrasing "All the topics taught by my teacher, except thermodynamics..." implies that thermodynamics *is* one of the topics taught by the teacher. If it were not taught, there would be no need to make it an exception to the characteristics of taught topics.
- Since thermodynamics is implied to be taught, the conclusion that both magnetism and thermodynamics are *not* taught is false.
- Therefore, conclusion (ii) does not logically follow.
Analysis of Conclusion (iii)
Conclusion (iii): The topic waves taught by my teacher is not very comprehensible.
- Statement (ii) clearly states that the teacher does *not* teach 'waves'.
- If a topic is not taught by the teacher, we cannot logically conclude anything about its comprehensibility or lack thereof, as taught by that specific teacher. The statement about comprehensibility in Statement (iii) only applies to topics that *are* taught.
- Therefore, conclusion (iii) does not logically follow.
Final Deduction
Based on the analysis, only conclusion (i) logically follows from the given statements.
Similar Questions
- Select the conclusion, from among the following options, which logically follows from the given statement.
Statement:
One must work hard to be successful in life. - Read the given statement and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statement:
Doing exercises in the morning is good for health.
Conclusion 1:
Health can be maintained by doing exercises only.
Conclusion 2:
Without doing exercises, people will become ill. - Read the given statements and conclusions carefully and select the conclusion(s) that logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
Indian Education is lacking quality due to low funds. India is allocating additional funds to education sector.
Conclusions:
I. There would be improvement in quality of education in India.
II. Only funds can improve the education standards. - In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.
Statement:
If A was there in XYZ cricket team, XYZ would have been the invincible team in the world.
Conclusion:
I. Without A, XYZ cannot win.
II. A is more talented than anyone else in the XYZ cricket team - Read the given statement carefully and select from among the given options, the conclusion that logically follows from the statement.
Statement:
Ability is a poor man's wealth. - Read the given statement and conclusions carefully and decide which conclusion(s) is/are implicit in the statement.
Statement:
No nation is completely self-dependent these days.
Conclusions:
I. Citizens of the country have become lazy.
II. It is impossible to grow and produce all that a nation needs. - Read the given statements and conclusions carefully and decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
1. Lack of education is responsible for lower income of a state.
2. Bihar ranks very low in per capita income.
Conclusions:
I. Bihar has a lower rate of education.
II. Bihar is a very historic state. - Read the given statement and conclusions carefully and decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statement.
Statement:
Company ABC has the highest number of customers as compared to its competitors.
Conclusions:
1. Company ABC has 58% of the total customers.
2. Company ABC's products are the cheapest in the market. - Read the given statement and conclusions carefully and decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statement.
Statement:
Most students have charismatic personalities.
Conclusions:
1. Some students have charismatic personalities.
2. All students have charismatic personalities. Read the given statement and conclusions carefully and decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statement.
Statement:
The book 'P' emphasizes only on population of India and its related problems during 2001-2015.
Conclusions:
I. Increasing population is the biggest problem in India.
II. The book is the only book which deals with the problem of population in India.
Important Questions from Statement and Conclusions
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
All cats are bills.
No snakes are bills.
All snakes are dolls.
Conclusions:
(I) Some dolls are not cats.
(II) No bills are dolls.- Statement: Resilience supports recovery from setbacks, but without learning from mistakes, progress may stall.
Conclusion I: Resilience alone may not ensure progress.
Conclusion II: Learning from mistakes guarantees recovery.
Which conclusion follows? - Read the following statement carefully and identify the conclusion that follows.
Statement: "Government should provide free education to all children up to the age of 14."
Conclusions:
I. Education is a basic right of every child.
II. A large number of children are deprived of basic education. - Statement: Ethical behavior fosters trust, but profitability often relies on operational efficiency as well.
Conclusion I: Ethical behavior is not sufficient for profitability.
Conclusion II: Operational efficiency is required for trust.
Which conclusion follows? - Read the following statement carefully and identify the conclusion that follows.
Statement: "Online learning has increased student participation."
Conclusions:
I. Students did not participate in physical classes.
II. Technology helps in engaging students.
