Statements:
All silk cloths are woollen cloths.
No woollen cloth is a nylon cloth.
Conclusions:
I. No silk cloth is a nylon cloth.
II. All woollen cloths are silk cloths.
We are given two statements:
Conclusion I states: No silk cloth is a nylon cloth ($S \cap N = \emptyset$).
From Statement 1, we know that the set of silk cloths is entirely contained within the set of woollen cloths ($S \subseteq W$).
From Statement 2, we know that the set of woollen cloths and the set of nylon cloths have no overlap ($W \cap N = \emptyset$).
Since all silk cloths are woollen cloths, and no woollen cloth is a nylon cloth, it logically follows that no silk cloth can be a nylon cloth. Therefore, Conclusion I is valid.
Conclusion II states: All woollen cloths are silk cloths ($W \subseteq S$).
Statement 1 says, "All silk cloths are woollen cloths" ($S \subseteq W$). This means the category 'silk' is a subset of 'woollen'. It does not state the reverse, that 'woollen' is a subset of 'silk'. For example, there could be woollen cloths that are not silk.
Therefore, Conclusion II does not logically follow from the statements.
Only Conclusion I logically follows from the given statements.
Read the given statement and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statement is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statement.
Statement:
All reds are black.
Conclusions:
1. Some blacks are red.
2. Some reds are black.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the statements.
Statements:
All benches are bags.
Some bags are pillows.
Some bags are not chairs.
Conclusions:
Some benches are pillows.
Some pillows are chairs.
Read the given statement(s) and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statement(s).
Statements:
Some apples are baskets. All baskets are drums.
Conclusions:
(I) Some drums are apples.
(II) No drum is an apple.
Read the given statement(s) and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statement(s).
Statements: All eggs are kings. Some kings are tickets.
Conclusion (I): All tickets are eggs.
Conclusion (II): Some eggs are tickets.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statement: All Corns are Cauliflowers. No Cauliflowers are Spinaches.
Conclusion (I): No Spinaches are Corns.
Conclusion (II): Some Spinaches are Corns.
Premises : All metals are grey in colour. Some metals are heavy.
Conclusion: I. All heavy metals are grey in colour.
II. All light metals are not grey in colour.
Premises : All film stars are playback singers. All film directors are film stars.
Conclusion: I. All film directors are playback singers.
II. Some film stars are film directors.
Premises : All apples are golden in colour. No golden coloured things are cheap.
Conclusion: I. All apples are cheap.
II. Golden coloured apples are not cheap.
Read the given statement and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statement is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statement.
Statement:
All reds are black.
Conclusions:
1. Some blacks are red.
2. Some reds are black.