Statement:
A 'well done' is better than a 'well said'.
Conclusions:
L. One must say 'well done' to people when they do something good.
M. Actions leave greater impact on others than speeches.
The core statement is: "A 'well done' is better than a 'well said'." This establishes a comparison, valuing action ('well done') over mere words ('well said'). It implies that actions have greater significance or impact.
Let's analyze each conclusion based on the statement:
The statement compares the value of action versus speech. It does not mandate or prescribe any specific action, such as telling people 'well done'. While the statement suggests actions are important, it doesn't create an obligation to praise them verbally. Therefore, conclusion L does not directly follow.
The statement "A 'well done' is better than a 'well said'" directly supports this conclusion. 'Well done' symbolizes action, and 'well said' symbolizes speech. The statement explicitly states that the former ('well done'/action) is superior to the latter ('well said'/speech), implying a greater impact or value. Thus, conclusion M logically follows.
Based on the analysis, only Conclusion M is a direct logical inference from the provided statement.
Read the given statement and conclusions carefully and decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statement.
Statement:
The book 'P' emphasizes only on population of India and its related problems during 2001-2015.
Conclusions:
I. Increasing population is the biggest problem in India.
II. The book is the only book which deals with the problem of population in India.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
All cats are bills.
No snakes are bills.
All snakes are dolls.
Conclusions:
(I) Some dolls are not cats.
(II) No bills are dolls.