Question: What was the share of the picnic cost to be borne by each student?
Statements:
I) The total cost of the picnic was ₹ 12,500, and the number of students who went for the picnic was 15.
II) If 3 fewer students would have gone, then the cost of the picnic per student would have increased by ₹ 120.
The question asks to determine if the given statements are sufficient to calculate the share of the picnic cost borne by each student.
Statement I provides the total cost of the picnic and the number of students who attended.
The cost per student can be calculated by dividing the total cost by the number of students:
Cost per student = Total Cost / Number of Students
Using LaTeX notation: Cost per student = \(\frac{₹ 12,500}{15}\)
This calculation yields a specific value (₹ 833.33). Therefore, Statement I alone is sufficient to answer the question.
Statement II presents a hypothetical scenario where fewer students attended, leading to an increased cost per student.
Let \(C\) be the total cost and \(N\) be the original number of students.
Original cost per student = \(\frac{C}{N}\)
If 3 fewer students attended, the number of students would be \(N-3\). The new cost per student would be \(\frac{C}{N-3}\).
According to the statement, the new cost per student is ₹ 120 more than the original cost per student:
\(\frac{C}{N-3} = \frac{C}{N} + 120\)
This equation has two unknown variables, \(C\) and \(N\). We cannot determine the original cost per student (\(\frac{C}{N}\)) from this single equation without knowing the value of either \(C\) or \(N\). Therefore, Statement II alone is not sufficient.
Statement I provides direct information to calculate the cost per student. Statement II does not provide enough information to calculate the cost per student.
Thus, Statement I alone is sufficient, while Statement II alone is not sufficient.
A dishonest dealer professes to sell goods at the cost price, but uses a false weight of 900 grams instead of a kilogram. His gain percentage is:
A dishonest shopkeeper pretends to sell his goods at cost price. However, he uses a false weight on which 984 gm is written, but actually weighs lesser. Using this false weight, the shopkeeper makes a gain of 23%. The actual measure of the weight used is:
Rakesh starts a business with a capital of ₹2,50,000. He incurs a loss of 5% during the first year. However, he makes a profit of 4% on his remaining investment during the second year. Finally, he makes a profit of 20% on his new capital during the third year. Find his total profit at the end of three years.
Rohit buys 8 pens and 4 pencils for Rs. 2400. He sells pencils at a profit of 20 percent and pens at the loss of 10 percent. If his overall profit is Rs. 240, then what is the sum of the cost price of one pen and one pencil?
The cost price of an article is Rs.6,450. If it sold at a profit 16%, how much would be its selling price?
If the selling price of 7 articles is equal to the cost price of 6 articles, then what is the percentage loss?
An article when sold at a gain of 5%, yields Rs. 15 more than when sold at a loss of 5%. The cost price will be
What will be cost price of an item which when sold at the profit of 5% and at the loss of 5% the difference of selling prices be Rs. 60?