"I am going to watch her expenditure pattern because I notice a tendency on her part to splurge."
Which of the following conclusions is/are valid with respect to the statement?
(A) The speaker is a well-wisher of hers.
(B) She is spending beyond her means.
(C) The speaker is a concerned parent.
The core of the question lies in interpreting the statement: "I am going to watch her expenditure pattern because I notice a tendency on her part to splurge." We need to determine which conclusions logically follow from this statement alone.
Based on the analysis, only the conclusion that the speaker is a well-wisher is directly and logically supported by the provided statement about observing an expenditure pattern due to a tendency to splurge. The specific relationship (parent) or financial status (beyond means) cannot be definitively concluded.
Read the given statement and conclusions carefully and decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statement.
Statement:
The book 'P' emphasizes only on population of India and its related problems during 2001-2015.
Conclusions:
I. Increasing population is the biggest problem in India.
II. The book is the only book which deals with the problem of population in India.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
All cats are bills.
No snakes are bills.
All snakes are dolls.
Conclusions:
(I) Some dolls are not cats.
(II) No bills are dolls.