Let \( R \) be the relation on \( \mathbb{N} \) (set of natural numbers) defined by \( R = \{(a, b) : a, b \in \mathbb{N} \) and \( b \) is divisible by \( a\} \). Then the relation \( R \) is:
Reflexive, transitive but not symmetric.
The question asks us to examine a specific relation \( R \) defined on the set of natural numbers, denoted by \( \mathbb{N} \). The set of natural numbers \( \mathbb{N} \) usually starts with 1, i.e., \( \{1, 2, 3, \dots\} \). The relation \( R \) is defined as \( R = \{(a, b) : a, b \in \mathbb{N} \) and \( b \) is divisible by \( a\} \). This means that an ordered pair \( (a, b) \) belongs to the relation \( R \) if and only if \( a \) divides \( b \). We need to determine if this relation \( R \) is reflexive, symmetric, or transitive.
A relation \( R \) on a set \( A \) is said to be reflexive if for every element \( a \in A \), the ordered pair \( (a, a) \) is in the relation \( R \). In this problem, our set is \( \mathbb{N} \). So, we need to check if for every \( a \in \mathbb{N} \), \( (a, a) \in R \).
According to the definition of \( R \), \( (a, a) \in R \) means that the second element (\( a \)) is divisible by the first element (\( a \)). Is any natural number \( a \) divisible by itself?
Yes, for any natural number \( a \), \( a \) is divisible by \( a \) because \( a = 1 \times a \), and \( 1 \) is an integer (in fact, a natural number). For example:
Since \( (a, a) \in R \) for all \( a \in \mathbb{N} \), the relation \( R \) is reflexive.
A relation \( R \) on a set \( A \) is said to be symmetric if for all elements \( a, b \in A \), whenever \( (a, b) \in R \), it must also be true that \( (b, a) \in R \). In this case, we need to check if for all \( a, b \in \mathbb{N} \), if \( b \) is divisible by \( a \), then \( a \) is also divisible by \( b \).
Let's consider an example. Let \( a = 2 \) and \( b = 4 \). Both are natural numbers.
Since we found a pair \( (2, 4) \in R \) such that \( (4, 2) \notin R \), the condition for symmetry is not met. Therefore, the relation \( R \) is not symmetric.
A relation \( R \) on a set \( A \) is said to be transitive if for all elements \( a, b, c \in A \), whenever \( (a, b) \in R \) and \( (b, c) \in R \), it must also be true that \( (a, c) \in R \). In this case, we need to check if for all \( a, b, c \in \mathbb{N} \), if \( b \) is divisible by \( a \) and \( c \) is divisible by \( b \), then \( c \) is also divisible by \( a \).
Let's assume \( (a, b) \in R \) and \( (b, c) \in R \), where \( a, b, c \in \mathbb{N} \).
Now we need to check if \( (a, c) \in R \), which means \( c \) is divisible by \( a \).
We have \( c = lb \) and we know \( b = ka \). Let's substitute the expression for \( b \) into the equation for \( c \):
\( c = l(ka) \)
Using the associative property of multiplication, we can write this as:
\( c = (lk)a \)
Since \( k \) and \( l \) are natural numbers, their product \( lk \) is also a natural number. Let \( m = lk \). Then \( c = ma \), where \( m \in \mathbb{N} \). This means that \( c \) is divisible by \( a \).
For example, let \( a = 2, b = 6, c = 18 \). All are natural numbers.
This holds true for all \( a, b, c \in \mathbb{N} \) where \( a|b \) and \( b|c \). The result is that \( a|c \). Therefore, the relation \( R \) is transitive.
Based on our analysis:
An equivalence relation is a relation that is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive. Since this relation is not symmetric, it is not an equivalence relation.
Thus, the relation \( R \) is reflexive, transitive but not symmetric.
| Property | Check for Relation R (b is divisible by a) | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Reflexive | Is \( a \) divisible by \( a \) for all \( a \in \mathbb{N} \)? Yes, \( a = 1 \cdot a \). | Yes |
| Symmetric | If \( b \) is divisible by \( a \), is \( a \) divisible by \( b \) for all \( a, b \in \mathbb{N} \)? No, e.g., 4 is divisible by 2, but 2 is not divisible by 4. | No |
| Transitive | If \( b \) is divisible by \( a \) and \( c \) is divisible by \( b \), is \( c \) divisible by \( a \) for all \( a, b, c \in \mathbb{N} \)? Yes, if \( b=ka \) and \( c=lb \), then \( c=l(ka)=(lk)a \). | Yes |
The relation \( R \) defined by \( (a, b) \in R \) if and only if \( b \) is divisible by \( a \) on the set of natural numbers \( \mathbb{N} \) is found to be reflexive and transitive, but not symmetric.
| Property | Definition on Set A | Example (Divisibility on \( \mathbb{N} \)) |
|---|---|---|
| Reflexive | For all \( a \in A \), \( (a, a) \in R \) | \( (5, 5) \in R \) because 5 is divisible by 5. Holds for all \( a \in \mathbb{N} \). |
| Symmetric | For all \( a, b \in A \), if \( (a, b) \in R \), then \( (b, a) \in R \) | \( (2, 4) \in R \) (4 is divisible by 2). Is \( (4, 2) \in R \)? (Is 2 divisible by 4?) No. |
| Transitive | For all \( a, b, c \in A \), if \( (a, b) \in R \) and \( (b, c) \in R \), then \( (a, c) \in R \) | \( (2, 6) \in R \) (6 is divisible by 2) and \( (6, 18) \in R \) (18 is divisible by 6). Is \( (2, 18) \in R \)? (Is 18 divisible by 2?) Yes. |
| Equivalence Relation | Reflexive, Symmetric, and Transitive | Divisibility on \( \mathbb{N} \) is not an equivalence relation as it is not symmetric. |
Relations are fundamental concepts in mathematics, particularly in discrete mathematics and set theory. They describe connections between elements of sets. Understanding the properties like reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity helps classify different types of relations.
Analyzing relations based on these properties is a key skill in understanding mathematical structures.
If \( f: \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R} \) is a function given by \( f(x) = \lfloor x \rfloor \) (greatest integer function), then which of the following is/are correct?
Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
If \( m \) and \( M \) are respectively minimum and maximum values of \( f(x) = |2 - |x|| \), for \( -3 \leq x \leq 3 \), then:
Let \( R \) be an equivalence relation on the set \( A = \{1,2,3,4,5\} \) given by \( R = \{(x,y):2 \) divides \( (x-y) \} \). Then the equivalence class of 3 is:
Which one of the following represents the correct feasible region determined by the following constraints of an LPP?
\( x + y \geq 10, \quad 2x + 2y \leq 25, \quad x \geq 0, \quad y \geq 0 \)
If the function \( f: \mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{N} \) is defined as
\( f(n) = \begin{cases} n - 1, & \text{if } n \text{ is even} \\ n + 1, & \text{if } n \text{ is odd} \end{cases} \)
then:
(A) \( f \) is injective
(B) f is into
(C) f is surjective
(D) f is invertible
Choose the correct answer from the options given below :
Let [x] denote the greatest integer function. Then match List-I with List-II:
| List-I | List-II |
|---|---|
| (A) |x - 1| + |x - 2| | (I) is differentiable everywhere except at x = 0 |
| (B) x - |x| | (II) is continuous everywhere |
| (C) x - [x] | (III) is not differentiable at x = 1 |
| (D) x |x| | (IV) is differentiable at x = 1 |
Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
If \( f: \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R} \) is a function given by \( f(x) = \lfloor x \rfloor \) (greatest integer function), then which of the following is/are correct?
Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
If \( m \) and \( M \) are respectively minimum and maximum values of \( f(x) = |2 - |x|| \), for \( -3 \leq x \leq 3 \), then: