All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

'Legal Positivism' theory was developed by

This question was previously asked in
CDS II 2021 General Knowledge Previous Year Paper (14-Nov-2021)
The correct answer is

John Austin

Understanding Legal Positivism Theory

The question asks about the legal theorist who developed the 'Legal Positivism' theory. Legal Positivism is a school of thought in the philosophy of law that argues that laws are rules made, whether deliberately or unintentionally, by human beings, rather than deriving from morality or nature. It asserts that the existence and content of law depend on social facts, not on its merits.

Identifying the Developer of Legal Positivism

Several prominent thinkers have contributed to or are associated with Legal Positivism, but one figure is widely considered the founder of analytical legal positivism:

  • T. H. Green was a British idealist philosopher, primarily known for his political philosophy emphasizing social liberalism and positive freedom, not directly for developing legal positivism.
  • Thomas Hobbes was an English philosopher, famous for his work on political philosophy and the social contract theory (especially in 'Leviathan'), but he is not credited with founding legal positivism as a distinct school of thought in the way John Austin is.
  • John Austin was an English legal theorist who significantly influenced Anglo-American law with his analytical approach to jurisprudence and his formulation of legal positivism. His work, particularly "The Province of Jurisprudence Determined," laid the groundwork for legal positivism, defining law as commands issued by a sovereign, backed by sanctions.
  • Patrick Devlin was a British judge and legal philosopher known for his debate with H.L.A. Hart on the relationship between law and morality, particularly concerning the enforcement of morals. While his work touches upon the separation of law and morality (a theme related to positivism), he is not the developer of the theory itself.

Based on legal history and jurisprudence, John Austin is recognized as the key figure in developing classical legal positivism.

John Austin's Contribution to Legal Positivism

John Austin's version of legal positivism is often called the "command theory of law." Key aspects include:

  • Law is a command issued by a sovereign.
  • The sovereign is a determinate human superior who is habitually obeyed by the bulk of a society but who does not himself habitually obey any other person.
  • Commands are backed by sanctions or the threat of punishment for non-compliance.
  • There is a strict separation between law as it is ('lex lata') and law as it ought to be ('lex ferenda'). Morality is distinct from law, although they may influence each other.

This framework provided a systematic way to analyze law based purely on its source (the sovereign's command) rather than its moral content, which is a cornerstone of legal positivism.

Conclusion on the Developer

Considering the foundational work in establishing legal positivism as a distinct analytical approach to law, John Austin is correctly identified as the developer of this theory.

Revision Table: Key Legal Philosophers

Theorist Key School/Theory Main Focus
John Austin Legal Positivism (Analytical Positivism) Law as commands, Sovereign, Sanctions
T. H. Green British Idealism, Social Liberalism Positive Freedom, General Will
Thomas Hobbes Social Contract Theory State of Nature, Sovereign Power (Leviathan)
Patrick Devlin Law and Morality Debate Enforcement of Morals, Individual Liberty

Additional Information: Evolution of Legal Positivism

While John Austin provided an early formulation of legal positivism, the theory has evolved considerably. Later positivists like H.L.A. Hart criticized and refined Austin's command theory. Hart's work, "The Concept of Law," introduced the idea of primary and secondary rules and the rule of recognition, offering a more sophisticated account of law that moved beyond simple commands and habits of obedience. Understanding Austin's foundational work is crucial for appreciating the development and critiques within the field of legal positivism.

The core tenet remains consistent: the validity of a law depends on its source and creation process according to social rules, not on its moral justification.

Was this answer helpful?

Similar Questions

  1. Which of the following statement(s) are true with respect to the concept of ‘EFFICIENCY’ as used in mainstream economics?

    1. Efficiency occurs when no possible organization of production can make anyone better off without making someone else worse off.
    2. An economy is clearly inefficient if it is inside the Production Possibility Frontier (PPF).
    3. At a minimum, an efficient economy is on its Production Possibility Frontier (PPF).
    4. The terms such as ‘Pareto Efficiency’, ‘Pareto Optimality’ and ‘Allocative Efficiency’ are all essentially one and the same which denotes ‘efficiency in resource allocation’.

    Select the correct answer using the code given below:
  2. Which one of the following statements with regard to economic models is not correct?

  3. 'Sub-prime crisis' is a term associated with which one of the following events?

  4. The situation where the equilibrium level of real GDP falls short of potential GDP is known as _________.

  5. Which one of the following equals Personal Disposable Income ?

  6. The working of the price mechanism in a free-market economy refers to which one of the following?

  7. Indexation is a method whose use can be associated with which one of the following ?

  8. Who among the following has given the concept of Human Development?

  9. Capital deepening refers to

  10. Which one of the following statements is not correct ?


Important Questions from National Income Accounting

  1. A Giffen good exhibits an upward-sloping demand curve, a unique characteristic where the Law of Demand is violated. This phenomenon primarily arises when the negative income effect of a price change is so substantial that it outweighs the substitution effect. Based on this, which statement correctly describes the nature of the overall price effect and the income effect for a Giffen good?
  2. In the context of Indian economy, consider the following statements: 

    1) The growth rate of GDP has steadily increased in the last five years. 

    2) The growth rate in per capita income has steadily increased in the last five years. 

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  3. The national income of a country for a given period is equal to the

  4. Which of the following Institutions estimate the national income of India?

  5. During a recession when GDP falls, disposable income _______.

Need Expert Advice?
Test Series
CDS img
Defence
UPSC CDS 2026 Mock Test Series
536 Tests 4 Tests Free
1633 Attempts
4.3(174)
English, Hindi
More Questions from CDS

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App