If μ 4, = 199, μ 3= 50 and μ 2= 8, then the value of excess kurtosis is:
0.109
This question asks us to calculate the excess kurtosis of a distribution given its second and fourth central moments. Kurtosis is a measure that describes the "tailedness" of a probability distribution's peak and tails relative to a normal distribution. Excess kurtosis is kurtosis minus 3.
Central moments are specific types of moments of a probability distribution. The \(k\)-th central moment, denoted by \(\mu_k\), is the expected value of \((X - \mu)^k\), where \(X\) is the random variable and \(\mu\) is the mean of the distribution. Different central moments describe different characteristics of the distribution:
Kurtosis is typically calculated using the formula involving the fourth and second central moments:
$$\beta_2 = \frac{\mu_4}{\mu_2^2}$$
We are given the following values:
Let's substitute the given values of \(\mu_4\) and \(\mu_2\) into the formula for kurtosis:
$$\beta_2 = \frac{199}{8^2} = \frac{199}{64}$$
Now, we calculate the value:
$$\beta_2 = \frac{199}{64} \approx 3.109375$$
Excess kurtosis is defined as the kurtosis minus 3. This is done because a normal distribution has a kurtosis of exactly 3. Excess kurtosis tells us how much the distribution's kurtosis differs from that of a normal distribution.
The formula for excess kurtosis is:
$$\gamma_2 = \beta_2 - 3$$
Using the calculated value of \(\beta_2\):
$$\gamma_2 = \frac{199}{64} - 3$$
To subtract 3, we can express 3 with a denominator of 64: \(3 = \frac{3 \times 64}{64} = \frac{192}{64}\).
So, the excess kurtosis is:
$$\gamma_2 = \frac{199}{64} - \frac{192}{64} = \frac{199 - 192}{64} = \frac{7}{64}$$
Now, let's convert the fraction to a decimal:
$$\gamma_2 = \frac{7}{64} \approx 0.109375$$
The calculated excess kurtosis value is approximately 0.109375. Let's look at the given options:
Our calculated value, 0.109375, is closest to 0.109.
Given:
Kurtosis \(\beta_2 = \frac{\mu_4}{\mu_2^2} = \frac{199}{8^2} = \frac{199}{64}\)
Excess Kurtosis \(\gamma_2 = \beta_2 - 3 = \frac{199}{64} - 3 = \frac{199 - 192}{64} = \frac{7}{64} \approx 0.109\)
| Statistic | Formula | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Second Central Moment (\(\mu_2\)) | \(E[(X-\mu)^2]\) (Variance) | 8 |
| Fourth Central Moment (\(\mu_4\)) | \(E[(X-\mu)^4]\) | 199 |
| Kurtosis (\(\beta_2\)) | \(\frac{\mu_4}{\mu_2^2}\) | \(\frac{199}{64} \approx 3.109\) |
| Excess Kurtosis (\(\gamma_2\)) | \(\beta_2 - 3\) | \(\frac{7}{64} \approx 0.109\) |
| Concept | Definition/Formula | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Central Moment (\(\mu_k\)) | \(E[(X-\mu)^k]\) | Measures distribution shape (variance, skewness, kurtosis) |
| Variance (\(\mu_2\)) | \(\sigma^2 = E[(X-\mu)^2]\) | Measures spread or dispersion |
| Kurtosis (\(\beta_2\)) | \(\frac{\mu_4}{\mu_2^2}\) | Measures peakedness and tail heaviness |
| Excess Kurtosis (\(\gamma_2\)) | \(\beta_2 - 3\) | Compares kurtosis to that of a normal distribution (which is 3) |
Excess kurtosis helps us understand the shape of a probability distribution compared to a normal distribution:
In this problem, the excess kurtosis is approximately 0.109, which is positive. This suggests the distribution is slightly leptokurtic, meaning it has slightly heavier tails than a normal distribution.
While the third central moment (\(\mu_3\)) was given, it relates to skewness, which measures the asymmetry of the distribution. A skewness of 0 indicates a perfectly symmetric distribution. Skewness is often calculated using the formula \(\gamma_1 = \frac{\mu_3}{\mu_2^{3/2}}\).
The first four raw moments of distribution are 2, 136, 320, and 40,000, The coefficient of skewness is:
For a distribution, the percentile partition values are P 10 = 58.983, P 50 = 61.345 and P 90 = 63.831. Kelly's coefficient of skewness is:
A box contains four soccer balls printed with numbers 112, 121, 211. 222. A footballer chooses one ball at random. Let A 1be the event that the first digit of the printed number of the ball chosen is 1. Similarly, A 2and A 3denote that second as well as third digit of the printed number is 1. The events A 1,A 2, and A 3are:
If the Bowley’s coefficient of skewness is less than zero, then the distribution is:
If the data are skewed, which option of central tendency measure is the most unreliable indicator?
A and B are two events. A and B are their complement events, respectively, such that AB and AB are two mutually exclusive and exhaustive events in which the event A can occur. Then which option is correct?
If the distribution is negatively skewed, then the:
The first four moments about the mean of distribution are 0, μ 2, 0.7 and 18.75. If the distribution is mesokurtic, the value of μ 2, is
The following measures were computed for a moderately symmetrical frequency distribution: mean = 50, coefficient of variation = 35% and Karl Pearson's Coefficient of Skewness = - 0.25. The value of the median of the distribution is:
If Mean > Median > Mode, the distribution is:
Events A, Band C are mutually exclusive events such that \(P(A) = \dfrac{3x + 1}{3}, P(B) = \dfrac{1-x}{4}\)and \(P(C) = \dfrac{1-2x}{4}\)The set of possible values of x are in the interval
Let A, B be two events in a discrete probability space with ℙ(A) > 0 and ℙ(B) > 0. Which of the following are necessarily true?
A box contains 2 washers, 3 nuts and 4 bolts. Items are drawn from the box at random one at a time without replacement. The probability of drawing 2 washers first followed by 3 nuts and subsequently the 4 bolts is