All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

Let A, B be two events in a discrete probability space with ℙ(A) > 0 and ℙ(B) > 0. Which of the following are necessarily true?

Probability Concepts and Conditional Probability

The question asks us to identify statements that are necessarily true regarding conditional probabilities of two events, A and B, in a discrete probability space. We are given that the probabilities of both events are positive, i.e., $\mathbb{P}(A) > 0$ and $\mathbb{P}(B) > 0$.

Let's recall the definition of conditional probability:

  • The conditional probability of event A occurring given that event B has occurred is $\mathbb{P}(A \mid B) = \frac{\mathbb{P}(A \cap B)}{\mathbb{P}(B)}$, provided $\mathbb{P}(B) > 0$.
  • The conditional probability of event B occurring given that event A has occurred is $\mathbb{P}(B \mid A) = \frac{\mathbb{P}(A \cap B)}{\mathbb{P}(A)}$, provided $\mathbb{P}(A) > 0$.

Since we are given $\mathbb{P}(A) > 0$ and $\mathbb{P}(B) > 0$, these definitions are always valid for the given events.

Analyzing Each Statement

Statement 1: If $\mathbb{P}(A \mid B) = 0$ then $\mathbb{P}(B \mid A) = 0$.

Let's assume the condition $\mathbb{P}(A \mid B) = 0$ is true. Using the definition of conditional probability:

$\mathbb{P}(A \mid B) = \frac{\mathbb{P}(A \cap B)}{\mathbb{P}(B)} = 0$

Since we are given $\mathbb{P}(B) > 0$, the only way this equation can hold is if the numerator is zero.

$\mathbb{P}(A \cap B) = 0$

Now let's consider the conclusion $\mathbb{P}(B \mid A) = 0$. Using the definition:

$\mathbb{P}(B \mid A) = \frac{\mathbb{P}(A \cap B)}{\mathbb{P}(A)}$

We found that $\mathbb{P}(A \cap B) = 0$. Substituting this into the expression for $\mathbb{P}(B \mid A)$:

$\mathbb{P}(B \mid A) = \frac{0}{\mathbb{P}(A)}$

Since we are given $\mathbb{P}(A) > 0$, division by $\mathbb{P}(A)$ is allowed, and the result is 0.

$\mathbb{P}(B \mid A) = 0$

Thus, if $\mathbb{P}(A \mid B) = 0$, it necessarily follows that $\mathbb{P}(A \cap B) = 0$, which in turn necessarily implies $\mathbb{P}(B \mid A) = 0$. So, statement 1 is necessarily true.

Statement 2: If $\mathbb{P}(A \mid B) = 1$ then $\mathbb{P}(B \mid A) = 1$.

Let's assume the condition $\mathbb{P}(A \mid B) = 1$ is true. Using the definition:

$\mathbb{P}(A \mid B) = \frac{\mathbb{P}(A \cap B)}{\mathbb{P}(B)} = 1$

Since $\mathbb{P}(B) > 0$, this means $\mathbb{P}(A \cap B) = \mathbb{P}(B)$. This equality implies that event B must be a subset of event A ($B \subseteq A$), because the intersection of A and B is B itself.

Now let's consider the conclusion $\mathbb{P}(B \mid A) = 1$. Using the definition:

$\mathbb{P}(B \mid A) = \frac{\mathbb{P}(A \cap B)}{\mathbb{P}(A)}$

Since $\mathbb{P}(A \cap B) = \mathbb{P}(B)$, we have:

$\mathbb{P}(B \mid A) = \frac{\mathbb{P}(B)}{\mathbb{P}(A)}$

For $\mathbb{P}(B \mid A)$ to be 1, it must be the case that $\mathbb{P}(B) = \mathbb{P}(A)$. However, knowing that $B \subseteq A$ and $\mathbb{P}(B) > 0, \mathbb{P}(A) > 0$ does not necessarily mean $\mathbb{P}(B) = \mathbb{P}(A)$. For example, consider a sample space $\Omega = \{1, 2, 3\}$ with probabilities $\mathbb{P}(\{1\}) = 0.2$, $\mathbb{P}(\{2\}) = 0.3$, $\mathbb{P}(\{3\}) = 0.5$. Let $A = \{1, 2\}$ and $B = \{1\}$.

  • $\mathbb{P}(A) = 0.2 + 0.3 = 0.5$
  • $\mathbb{P}(B) = 0.2$
  • $\mathbb{P}(A \cap B) = \mathbb{P}(\{1\}) = 0.2$

Check the condition: $\mathbb{P}(A \mid B) = \frac{\mathbb{P}(A \cap B)}{\mathbb{P}(B)} = \frac{0.2}{0.2} = 1$. The condition is met.

Check the conclusion: $\mathbb{P}(B \mid A) = \frac{\mathbb{P}(A \cap B)}{\mathbb{P}(A)} = \frac{0.2}{0.5} = 0.4$. The conclusion $\mathbb{P}(B \mid A) = 1$ is not met, as $0.4 \neq 1$.

Therefore, statement 2 is not necessarily true.

Statement 3: If $\mathbb{P}(A \mid B) > \mathbb{P}(A)$ then $\mathbb{P}(B \mid A) > \mathbb{P}(B)$.

Let's analyze the condition $\mathbb{P}(A \mid B) > \mathbb{P}(A)$. Using the definition:

$\frac{\mathbb{P}(A \cap B)}{\mathbb{P}(B)} > \mathbb{P}(A)$

Since $\mathbb{P}(B) > 0$, we can multiply both sides by $\mathbb{P}(B)$ without changing the inequality direction:

$\mathbb{P}(A \cap B) > \mathbb{P}(A) \mathbb{P}(B)$

Now let's analyze the conclusion $\mathbb{P}(B \mid A) > \mathbb{P}(B)$. Using the definition:

$\frac{\mathbb{P}(A \cap B)}{\mathbb{P}(A)} > \mathbb{P}(B)$

Since $\mathbb{P}(A) > 0$, we can multiply both sides by $\mathbb{P}(A)$ without changing the inequality direction:

$\mathbb{P}(A \cap B) > \mathbb{P}(A) \mathbb{P}(B)$

We see that the condition $\mathbb{P}(A \mid B) > \mathbb{P}(A)$ is equivalent to the inequality $\mathbb{P}(A \cap B) > \mathbb{P}(A) \mathbb{P}(B)$. Similarly, the conclusion $\mathbb{P}(B \mid A) > \mathbb{P}(B)$ is also equivalent to $\mathbb{P}(A \cap B) > \mathbb{P}(A) \mathbb{P}(B)$. Therefore, if the condition is true, the inequality $\mathbb{P}(A \cap B) > \mathbb{P}(A) \mathbb{P}(B)$ holds, which in turn makes the conclusion true. So, statement 3 is necessarily true.

This relationship indicates that if event A is more likely given event B than it is overall, then event B is also more likely given event A than it is overall. This describes a positive correlation between the two events.

Statement 4: If $\mathbb{P}(A \mid B) > \mathbb{P}(B)$ then $\mathbb{P}(B \mid A) > \mathbb{P}(A)$.

Let's analyze the condition $\mathbb{P}(A \mid B) > \mathbb{P}(B)$. This is equivalent to $\frac{\mathbb{P}(A \cap B)}{\mathbb{P}(B)} > \mathbb{P}(B)$, which simplifies to $\mathbb{P}(A \cap B) > (\mathbb{P}(B))^2$ since $\mathbb{P}(B) > 0$.

Now let's analyze the conclusion $\mathbb{P}(B \mid A) > \mathbb{P}(A)$. This is equivalent to $\frac{\mathbb{P}(A \cap B)}{\mathbb{P}(A)} > \mathbb{P}(A)$, which simplifies to $\mathbb{P}(A \cap B) > (\mathbb{P}(A))^2$ since $\mathbb{P}(A) > 0$.

So, the statement claims: If $\mathbb{P}(A \cap B) > (\mathbb{P}(B))^2$, then $\mathbb{P}(A \cap B) > (\mathbb{P}(A))^2$. This is not necessarily true. We can construct a counterexample where $\mathbb{P}(A \cap B)$ is greater than $\mathbb{P}(B)^2$ but not greater than $\mathbb{P}(A)^2$. This would likely occur if $\mathbb{P}(A)$ is much larger than $\mathbb{P}(B)$.

Consider a sample space $\Omega = \{1, 2, 3\}$. Let probabilities be $\mathbb{P}(\{1\}) = 0.05$, $\mathbb{P}(\{2\}) = 0.9$, $\mathbb{P}(\{3\}) = 0.05$.

Let $A = \{1, 2\}$ and $B = \{1\}$.

  • $\mathbb{P}(A) = \mathbb{P}(\{1\}) + \mathbb{P}(\{2\}) = 0.05 + 0.9 = 0.95$
  • $\mathbb{P}(B) = \mathbb{P}(\{1\}) = 0.05$
  • $\mathbb{P}(A \cap B) = \mathbb{P}(\{1\}) = 0.05$

Check the condition: $\mathbb{P}(A \mid B) = \frac{\mathbb{P}(A \cap B)}{\mathbb{P}(B)} = \frac{0.05}{0.05} = 1$. Is $\mathbb{P}(A \mid B) > \mathbb{P}(B)$? Is $1 > 0.05$? Yes, the condition is met.

Check the conclusion: $\mathbb{P}(B \mid A) = \frac{\mathbb{P}(A \cap B)}{\mathbb{P}(A)} = \frac{0.05}{0.95} = \frac{5}{95} = \frac{1}{19} \approx 0.0526$. Is $\mathbb{P}(B \mid A) > \mathbb{P}(A)$? Is $\frac{1}{19} > 0.95$? No, $0.0526$ is not greater than $0.95$.

Therefore, statement 4 is not necessarily true.

Summary of Findings

Based on our analysis:

  • Statement 1 is necessarily true.
  • Statement 2 is not necessarily true.
  • Statement 3 is necessarily true.
  • Statement 4 is not necessarily true.

The statements that are necessarily true are Statement 1 and Statement 3.

Was this answer helpful?

Important Questions from Basics of Probability

  1. If the data are skewed, which option of central tendency measure is the most unreliable indicator?

  2. Events A, Band C are mutually exclusive events such that \(P(A) = \dfrac{3x + 1}{3}, P(B) = \dfrac{1-x}{4}\)and \(P(C) = \dfrac{1-2x}{4}\)The set of possible values of x are in the interval

  3. The Excess Kurtosis of the Geometric distribution with parameter p is:

  4. For a distribution, the mean is 10, variance is 16, γ 1is + 1 and β 2is 4. The distribution is:

  5. For the discrete distribution, the Pearson's coefficient of skewness β 2is always:

Need Expert Advice?

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App