Given below are two statements and two conclusions. Take the statements to be true even if they are at variance with commonly known facts, and decide whether the conclusion(s) follow(s) the given statements. Statements: All eyes are noses. Some noses are lips. Conclusions: I. Some noses are eyes. II. All lips are noses.
Only conclusion I follows
Understanding Syllogism and Drawing Conclusions
This question asks us to analyze two statements and determine which of the given conclusions logically follow from them. We must accept the statements as true, even if they contradict real-world knowledge. This is a standard type of question in logical reasoning, specifically dealing with syllogisms.
Analyzing the Syllogism Statements
Let's break down the given statements:
- Statement 1: All eyes are noses.
- Statement 2: Some noses are lips.
We can think of these statements in terms of categories or sets. Let 'Eyes' be set E, 'Noses' be set N, and 'Lips' be set L.
- Statement 1 (All E are N): This means that the set of Eyes (E) is completely contained within the set of Noses (N). In other words, if something is an eye, it must also be a nose.
- Statement 2 (Some N are L): This means that there is at least one element that is both in the set of Noses (N) and the set of Lips (L). There is an overlap or intersection between the sets N and L. However, it does not mean that all elements in N are in L, or that all elements in L are in N.
Evaluating the Conclusions
Now, let's examine each conclusion based on the statements:
Conclusion I: Some noses are eyes.
Statement 1 says "All eyes are noses". If every single eye is also a nose, then it logically follows that there must be some noses that are eyes (specifically, all the noses that happen to be eyes). Consider this: if you have a group of 10 items, and all 10 are red, then it's true that some of those 10 items are red. The statement "All A are B" always implies "Some B are A" (assuming A is not an empty set, which is typical in syllogism problems).
Therefore, Conclusion I directly follows from Statement 1.
Conclusion II: All lips are noses.
Statement 2 says "Some noses are lips". This means that the intersection between the set of noses and the set of lips is not empty. There could be several possible scenarios that satisfy "Some noses are lips":
- Only a few noses are lips, and the rest are not lips.
- Only a few lips are noses, and the rest are not noses.
- All lips are noses (This is one possibility, but not the only one guaranteed by the statement).
- All noses are lips (This is also a possibility, but not the only one).
The statement "Some N are L" only guarantees an overlap. It does not guarantee that the entire set of Lips (L) is contained within the set of Noses (N). For example, if there are 10 noses and 10 lips, and 3 items are both noses and lips, the statement is true. But there could still be 7 lips that are not noses. Therefore, we cannot definitively conclude that "All lips are noses".
Therefore, Conclusion II does not follow from the statements.
Final Decision
Based on our analysis:
- Conclusion I: Some noses are eyes - Follows.
- Conclusion II: All lips are noses - Does not follow.
Thus, only conclusion I follows from the given statements.
| Statement/Conclusion | Relationship | Follows? |
|---|---|---|
| Statement 1 | All Eyes → Noses | Given as true |
| Statement 2 | Some Noses ↔ Some Lips (Overlap) | Given as true |
| Conclusion I | Some Noses → Eyes? | Yes (From Statement 1) |
| Conclusion II | All Lips → Noses? | No (Statement 2 only guarantees overlap) |
Revision Table: Syllogism Rules
| Statement Type | Implied Conversions | Meaning (Sets A, B) |
|---|---|---|
| All A are B | Some B are A | Set A is a subset of Set B ($A \subseteq B$) |
| No A are B | No B are A | Sets A and B have no common elements ($A \cap B = \emptyset$) |
| Some A are B | Some B are A | Sets A and B have at least one common element ($A \cap B \neq \emptyset$) |
| Some A are not B | No valid simple conversion | There is at least one element in Set A that is not in Set B |
Additional Information: Syllogism Basics
Syllogism is a type of logical argument that applies deductive reasoning to arrive at a conclusion based on two or more propositions that are asserted or assumed to be true. In these problems, the structure is typically two statements (premises) and one or more conclusions. You must strictly adhere to the information given in the statements and not bring in any outside knowledge.
Key points for solving syllogism problems:
- Draw diagrams (like Venn diagrams) to visualize the relationships described in the statements.
- Analyze each conclusion independently based on whether it is necessarily true given the statements.
- Be careful with "some" statements. "Some" means "at least one", but can also include "all". However, "Some A are B" does NOT imply "All A are B" or "All B are A".
- The conclusion must follow logically and inevitably from the statements. If there is any possibility, however remote in the real world, for the conclusion to be false while the statements are true, then the conclusion does not follow.
This question tests your understanding of the implications of "All" and "Some" relationships in logical reasoning.
Similar Questions
Two statements are given, followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
All teachers are engineers.
All clerks are teachers.
Conclusions:
I. Some engineers are clerks.
II. Some teachers are clerks.
III. Some clerks are not engineers.
Two statements are given followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
All keys are locks.
All locks are handles.
Conclusions:
I. Some locks are keys.
II. Some handles are keys.
Three Statements are given followed by Three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
All switches are fans.
No heater is a fan.
Some wires are heaters.
Conclusions:
I. Some wires are fans.
II. No switch is a heater.
III. No wire is a switch.
Three statements are given followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
All H are G.
All V are H.
Some V are I.
Conclusions:
I. At least some G are I.
II. All I being H is a possibility.
Three Statements are given followed by Three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements :
Some beds are chairs.
Some chairs are tables.
All tables are cupboards.
Conclusions :
I. Some tables are beds.
II. Some cupboards are chairs.
III. Some cupboards are beds.
Read the given statement(s) and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statement(s).
Statements :
Some ceilings are beds.
No bed is an apple.
All dogs are beds.
Conclusions :
I. Some ceilings being dogs is a possibility.
II. No dog is an apple.
III. All beds are dogs.
IV. No ceiling is an apple.
Two statements are given followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
All keys are locks.
All locks are handles.
Conclusions:
I. All locks are keys.
II. All handles are keys.
Two statements are given followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
Some windows are doors.
No window is a cupboard.
Conclusions:
I. No cupboard is a door.
II. Some doors are definitely not cupboard.
Three Statements are given followed by Four conclusions numbered I, II, III and IV. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
Some copies are pillows.
Some pillows are laptops.
Some laptops are pens.
Conclusions:
I. Some copies are laptops.
II. Some pillows are pens.
III. Some pens are laptops.
IV. Some pens are pillows.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
1) Some trousers are pants.
2) All pants are jeans.
3) All jeans are coats.
Conclusions:
I. All pants are coats.
II. At least some trousers are jeans
Important Questions from Conventional Syllogism
In this question, three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II have been given. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.
Statements: Some flats are apartments.
No apartment is a hall.
Some halls are rooms.
Conclusions: I. At least some rooms are flats.
II. No apartment is a room.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
I. Some blue are red.
II. Some green are red.
Conclusions:
I. No blue is green.
II. No red is green.
Given below are two statements, Consider these statements to be true even if they seem factuality absurd, Read the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the given statements?
Statements :
1. All vases are flowers.
2. No flowers is a plant.
Conclusions :
1. No vases is a plant.
2. Some plant are vases
In the question two statements are given, followed by three conclusions, I, II and III. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements.
Statement 1 : Some cars are scooters.
Statement 2 : All scooters are buses.
Conclusion I : Some scooters are cars.
Conclusion II : Some buses are cars.
Conclusion III : All cars are buses.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information in the statement is true even if they appear to be at variance with commonly known facts, choose the conclusion that logically follows from the statement beyond reasonable doubt.
Statement:-
1. Some dogs are cats.
2. All cats are birds.
Conclusion:-
1. Some dogs are birds.
2. No cat is dog.
