Assertion: The Treaty of Paris (1763) limited French settlements in India to trading posts only.
Reason: The French could no longer station troops or fortify their factories after the treaty.
The question asks about the effects of the Treaty of Paris, signed in 1763, on French settlements and military capabilities in India. We need to evaluate the given Assertion and Reason based on historical facts.
The Assertion states that the Treaty of Paris (1763) restricted French settlements in India to solely functioning as trading posts.
The Reason claims that following the treaty, the French were forbidden from keeping troops or fortifying their factories (establishments) in India.
The Reason explains the direct cause behind the situation described in the Assertion.
Both the Assertion and the Reason accurately reflect the historical consequences of the Treaty of Paris (1763) on French ambitions in India. The restrictions imposed on military forces and fortifications were the key reasons for limiting French presence to mere trading posts.
| Column A | Column B |
| A. Anglo-Russian rivalry | 1. Opened Sindh's rivers and roads to British trade. |
| B. Subsidiary Treaty 1839 | 2. Forced on the Amirs of Sindh before annexation. |
| C. Sir Charles Napier | 3.Had commercial value; attracted British interest. |
| D. River Sindh | 4.Led military campaign to annex Sindh; called it a "rascality." |
| E. Treaty of 1832 | 5. Led Britain to expand influence in Afghanistan and Persia |
Which military officer led the British forces in the Battle of Chinhat fought in 1857?
Which of the following statements is/are correct regarding the Indian National Congress (INC)?
a) The INC was founded in 1885 by Allan Octavian Hume.
b) The first session of the INC was held in Pune under the presidency of WC Bonnerjee.