For a distribution of student’s height, the quartiles are 60.125, 61.345, 62.688. The absolute measure of skewness is:
0.123
This question asks us to find the absolute measure of skewness for a distribution of student heights, given specific values for the quartiles. Skewness is a statistical measure that describes the asymmetry of a probability distribution. A distribution can be symmetric, skewed to the right (positively skewed), or skewed to the left (negatively skewed).
Quartiles are points that divide a dataset into four equal parts. They are denoted as:
The given quartiles for the student height distribution are:
When only quartiles are available, a common way to measure skewness involves comparing the distances between the median and the quartiles. One such measure, often referred to when dealing with quartiles, is derived from Bowley's coefficient of skewness, or related concepts focusing on the symmetry around the median.
While several formulas exist for skewness, the term "absolute measure of skewness" in the context of quartiles, especially when matching one of the provided options precisely, often points towards the calculation of the expression $Q_1 + Q_3 - 2 \times Q_2$. This expression quantifies the asymmetry between the upper and lower halves of the distribution relative to the median.
The calculation is as follows:
Measure = $Q_1 + Q_3 - 2 \times Q_2$
Let's substitute the given quartile values into the formula:
Sum = $Q_1 + Q_3 = 60.125 + 62.688 = 122.813$
Twice Median = $2 \times Q_2 = 2 \times 61.345 = 122.690$
Measure = $(Q_1 + Q_3) - (2 \times Q_2) = 122.813 - 122.690 = 0.123$
The calculated value is 0.123.
We compare the calculated value with the given options:
Our calculated measure of skewness is 0.123, which exactly matches Option 4.
A positive value like 0.123 suggests that the distribution is slightly skewed to the right, meaning the tail on the right side is longer or fatter than the left side. The magnitude indicates the degree of this asymmetry.
If the data are skewed, which option of central tendency measure is the most unreliable indicator?
The Excess Kurtosis of the Geometric distribution with parameter p is:
For a distribution, the mean is 10, variance is 16, γ 1is + 1 and β 2is 4. The distribution is:
For the discrete distribution, the Pearson's coefficient of skewness β 2is always:
60% of the employees of a company are college graduates. Of these, 10% are in sales. Of the employees who did not graduate from college, 80% are in sales. The probability that an employee selected at random is in sales, is:
The probability that a contractor gets a plumbing contract is 2 / 3 and the probability that he will not get an electric contract is 5 / 9. If the probability of getting at least one contract is 4 / 5, then the probability that he will get both the contracts is:
For a frequency distribution of a variable x, mean = 32, median = 30. The distribution is:
The first four raw moments of distribution are 2, 136, 320, and 40,000, The coefficient of skewness is:
For a distribution, the percentile partition values are P 10 = 58.983, P 50 = 61.345 and P 90 = 63.831. Kelly's coefficient of skewness is:
A box contains four soccer balls printed with numbers 112, 121, 211. 222. A footballer chooses one ball at random. Let A 1be the event that the first digit of the printed number of the ball chosen is 1. Similarly, A 2and A 3denote that second as well as third digit of the printed number is 1. The events A 1,A 2, and A 3are:
If the data are skewed, which option of central tendency measure is the most unreliable indicator?
Events A, Band C are mutually exclusive events such that \(P(A) = \dfrac{3x + 1}{3}, P(B) = \dfrac{1-x}{4}\)and \(P(C) = \dfrac{1-2x}{4}\)The set of possible values of x are in the interval
Let A, B be two events in a discrete probability space with ℙ(A) > 0 and ℙ(B) > 0. Which of the following are necessarily true?
The Excess Kurtosis of the Geometric distribution with parameter p is:
For a distribution, the mean is 10, variance is 16, γ 1is + 1 and β 2is 4. The distribution is: