Consider the following statements : I. Re-construction operation used in mixed fragmentation satisfies commutative rule. II. Re-construction operation used in vertical fragmentation satisfies commutative rule Which of the following is correct ?
II
Fragmentation splits a relation so that the original can be rebuilt: horizontal fragments (selections) are rebuilt with UNION, vertical fragments (projections that each keep the key) are rebuilt with a JOIN on the key, and mixed (hybrid) fragments are rebuilt by undoing both kinds of split.
Statement II is true. A vertically fragmented relation R is rebuilt as \(R = R_1 \bowtie R_2\), and the natural join is commutative: \(R_1 \bowtie R_2 = R_2 \bowtie R_1\). The fragments may be joined in any order and the same relation results.
Statement I is false. Mixed fragmentation is a selection applied after a projection (or vice versa), so its reconstruction is a fixed sequence of two different operations, e.g. \(R = (R_{11} \cup R_{12}) \bowtie R_2\). The unions must be done within the horizontal pieces before the join with the other vertical piece; the join and union steps cannot be interchanged, so the reconstruction as a whole does not obey a commutative rule.
Only statement II holds.
Hence, the answer is II.
Which of the following is true ?
I. Implementation of self-join is possible in SQL with table alias.
II. Outer-join operation is basic operation in relational algebra.
III. Natural join and outer join operations are equivalent.
Division operation is ideally suited to handle queries of the type :
Consider the following three tables R, S and T. In this question, all the join operations are natural joins (\(\bowtie\)). (\(\pi\)) is the projection operation of a relation :
| R | S | T | |||
| A | B | B | C | A | C |
| 1 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 7 | 1 |
| 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 |
| 5 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 9 | 3 |
| 7 | 8 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 4 |
| 9 | 8 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 5 |
Possible answer tables for this question are also given as below :
(a)
| A | B | C |
| 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 1 | 2 | 5 |
| 3 | 2 | 4 |
| 3 | 2 | 5 |
| 5 | 6 | 2 |
| 7 | 8 | 1 |
| 7 | 8 | 3 |
| 9 | 8 | 1 |
| 9 | 8 | 3 |
(b)
| A | B | C |
| 1 | 2 | 2 |
| 3 | 2 | 5 |
| 5 | 6 | 4 |
| 7 | 8 | 1 |
| 9 | 8 | 3 |
(c)
| A | B | C |
| 1 | 6 | 2 |
| 3 | 2 | 5 |
| 5 | 2 | 4 |
| 7 | 8 | 1 |
| 9 | 8 | 3 |
(d)
| A | B | C |
| 3 | 2 | 5 |
| 7 | 8 | 1 |
| 9 | 8 | 3 |
What is the resulting table of \(\pi_{A,B}(R \bowtie T) \bowtie \pi_{B,C}(S \bowtie T)\) ?
A ________ operation combines the rows of the two relations and outputs a new relation that has both input relations’ rows in it.
Given below are the two statements:
Statement I : Any retrieval request that is specified in the basic relational algebra can also be specified in relational calculus.
Statement II : Any retrieval request that is specified in the relational calculus can also be specified in basic relational algebra.
In the light of the above statements, choose the correct answer from the options given below:
Consider the relations R(A, B) and S(B, C) and the following four relational algebra queries over R and S :
I. ΠA, B (R ⋈ S)
II. R ⋈ ΠB(S)
III. R ∩ (ΠA(R) × ΠB(S))
IV. ΠA,R.B (R × S) where R⋅B refers to the column B in table R.
One can determine that :
Consider the given relations $X$, $Y$ and $Z$. The relation $X$ has three columns $P$, $Q$ and $R$. The relation $Y$ has three columns $P$, $Q$ and $S$. The relation $Z$ has two columns $P$ and $T$.
Table X
| P | Q | R |
|---|---|---|
| P1 | Q1 | R1 |
| P2 | Q2 | R2 |
| P3 | Q3 | R2 |
Table Y
| P | Q | S |
|---|---|---|
| P1 | Q1 | 2 |
| P1 | Q2 | 5 |
| P2 | Q1 | 6 |
| P3 | Q3 | 1 |
Table Z
| P | T |
|---|---|
| P1 | T1 |
| P3 | T2 |
| P4 | T3 |
| P4 | NULL |
Consider the relational algebra expression $$ \Pi_{P, R, S} \left[ \left( \sigma_{(Q = Q3 \lor R = R2)} [X \bowtie Y] \right) \bowtie \left( \sigma_{(S > 1)} [Y \bowtie Z] \right) \right] $$ where $\bowtie$ denotes natural join operation.
Which of the following options is the correct output for the given expression?
Consider a database that includes the following relations:
Defender($name, rating, side, goals$)
Forward($name, rating, assists, goals$)
Team($name, club, price$)
Which ONE of the following relational algebra expressions checks that every name occurring in Team appears in either Defender or Forward, where $\phi$ denotes the empty set?
Consider the following three relations:
Car (model, year, serial, color)
Make (maker, model)
Own (owner, serial)
A tuple in Car represents a specific car of a given model, made in a given year, with a serial number and a color. A tuple in Make specifies that a maker company makes cars of a certain model. A tuple in Own specifies that an owner owns the car with a given serial number. Keys are underlined; (owner, serial) together form key for Own. ($\bowtie$ denotes natural join)
$ \pi_{\text{owner}} (\text{Own} \bowtie (\sigma_{\text{color}=\text{"red"}} (\text{Car} \bowtie (\sigma_{\text{maker}=\text{“ABC”}} \text{Make})))) $
Consider the following tables, Loan and Borrower of a bank.
| Loan | Borrower | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| loan_num | branch_name | amount | customer_name | loan_num |
| L11 | Banjara Hills | 90000 | Anand | L11 |
| L14 | Kondapur | 50000 | Karteek | L11 |
| L15 | SR Nagar | 40000 | Ankita | L15 |
| L22 | SR Nagar | 25000 | Gopal | L19 |
| L23 | Balanagar | 80000 | Karteek | L22 |
| L25 | Kondapur | 70000 | Karteek | L23 |
| L19 | SR Nagar | 65000 | Sunil | L23 |
| Sunil | L25 | |||
Query: $\pi_{\text{branch\_name}, \text{customer\_name}}(\mathbf{Loan} \bowtie \mathbf{Borrower}) \div \pi_{\text{branch\_name}}(\mathbf{Loan})$
where $\bowtie$ denotes natural join.
The number of tuples returned by the above relational algebra query is _______
(Answer in integer)