All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

Which of the following is not the advantage of merger ?

The correct answer is
Increased Competition

Merger Advantages Explained

A merger involves combining two or more companies into a single entity. This strategic move can bring several benefits to the involved businesses. However, it's important to distinguish between genuine advantages and other potential outcomes. Let's look at the options provided in the context of merger benefits:

Market Share Growth as Merger Advantage

Merging allows companies to combine their operations, customer bases, and resources. This often leads to an Increased Market Share, meaning the new, combined entity controls a larger percentage of the market compared to the individual companies before the merger. A larger market share can provide greater economies of scale and increased market influence, which are definite advantages.

Synergy Benefits in Mergers

A significant driver for mergers is the potential creation of Synergy. This concept, often summarized by the phrase '$1 + 1 > 2$', suggests that the combined company will achieve more success than the two independent companies could alone. Synergies can arise from cost reductions (like shared overheads or combined purchasing power) or revenue increases (like cross-selling products to a larger customer base). Achieving synergy is a primary advantage pursued through mergers.

Diversification Impact of Mergers

Companies may merge with firms in different industries or product lines to achieve Diversification. This strategy helps spread business risk. By operating in multiple sectors, the company becomes less vulnerable to downturns in any single market. If one business unit struggles, others might perform well, providing stability to the overall enterprise. This risk reduction is a valuable advantage.

Competition Dynamics and Mergers

The option 'Increased Competition' is typically not considered a direct advantage resulting from a merger. In most cases, mergers aim to consolidate market positions and potentially *reduce* competition between the merging firms. Regulatory bodies often scrutinize mergers to prevent anti-competitive effects, such as monopolies or oligopolies, that could harm consumers. While the combined entity might become a stronger competitor against rivals, the outcome described as 'Increased Competition' isn't a benefit gained *by* the merger itself; rather, mergers are often intended to manage or decrease competitive pressures among the participating firms.

Summary of Merger Benefits

In conclusion, while increased market share, synergy, and diversification are well-established advantages that companies seek through mergers, an increase in overall market competition is not considered a benefit derived from the merger process itself.

Was this answer helpful?

Important Questions from Mergers and ACquisitions - Teaching

  1. It is an act of acquiring effective control by one company over assets or management of another company without any combination of companies ?
  2. Assertion (A) : In an industrial structure, the acquisition of an existing firm in the industry might be a better move than starting-up a new venture.
    Reasoning (R) : There is evidence that internal development might be preferable to acquisition because of differences between culture and shared valued.
  3. Which of the following is a pre-offer takeover defence employed by target companies in hostile takeovers?

  4. Match each transaction type in List I with its specific hypothetical description in List II:

    List I: Transaction typeList II: Description
    (a) Merger into a single surviving company(i) The buyer purchases specified business assets, but no shares in the seller.
    (b) Asset-only acquisition(ii) With the target board’s support, the buyer acquires voting control through a share purchase; the target remains a separate company.
    (c) Friendly controlling-share acquisition(iii) Two companies combine legally into one surviving company, rather than remaining separate companies linked only by share ownership.
    (d) Hostile takeover bid(iv) A bidder pursues an offer for voting control directly to shareholders despite opposition from the target board.

    Choose the correct option:

  5. Match each multinational-company staffing policy in List I with the approach in List II.

    List I: Staffing policyList II: Approach
    A. Key overseas subsidiary positions are filled by nationals of the parent company’s home country.I. Polycentric
    B. Host-country nationals manage each foreign subsidiary, while parent-country nationals hold key headquarters positions.II. Geocentric
    C. The best-qualified candidates are selected for key positions worldwide, regardless of nationality.III. Regiocentric
    D. Managers may move between countries within a designated geographical region, but the staffing pool and transfers remain regionally bounded.IV. Ethnocentric

    Choose the correct matching from the options below:

Need Expert Advice?

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App