Which of the following is a negative effect of Green Revolution in India? (i) Depletion of groundwater table (ii) Deterioration in the quality of soil (iii) Increased input cost
(i), (ii) and (iii)
The Green Revolution was a period that saw significant increases in agricultural production in India, primarily beginning in the late 1960s. This was achieved through the adoption of new technologies, including High-Yielding Varieties (HYVs) of seeds, increased use of fertilizers and pesticides, and improved irrigation methods. While it successfully boosted food grain production and helped achieve food security, it also brought about several negative consequences.
Let's examine each statement to determine if it represents a negative effect of the Green Revolution in India:
Based on the analysis, all three statements describe widely recognized negative effects of the Green Revolution in India. The push for increased production came at a cost, impacting the environment (water and soil) and the economic condition of farmers due to higher expenses.
| Statement | Description | Negative Effect? |
|---|---|---|
| (i) Depletion of groundwater table | Excessive irrigation using tube wells lowered water levels. | Yes |
| (ii) Deterioration in the quality of soil | Intensive chemical use and farming practices degraded soil health. | Yes |
| (iii) Increased input cost | Higher expenses for seeds, fertilizers, pesticides, and irrigation energy. | Yes |
Therefore, all three listed points are indeed negative consequences of the Green Revolution in India.
| Positive Impacts | Negative Impacts |
|---|---|
| Increased food grain production (wheat, rice) | Environmental degradation (water depletion, soil issues) |
| Achievement of food self-sufficiency | Increased input costs for farmers |
| Higher income for farmers in initial years | Increased regional disparities (benefited irrigated areas more) |
| Growth of agro-industries | Health hazards from pesticide use |
| Reduced dependence on food imports | Loss of traditional crop varieties |
While the primary goal of the Green Revolution was to increase food production to feed a growing population and avoid famine, its implementation had complex and far-reaching consequences. The focus on high-yield varieties of wheat and rice, while successful in boosting output, led to a reduction in the cultivation of other traditional crops like millets and pulses, impacting dietary diversity and agricultural biodiversity. The benefits of the Green Revolution were not uniform across the country; regions with assured irrigation, like Punjab, Haryana, and parts of Western Uttar Pradesh, benefited significantly more than rain-fed areas, leading to increased regional inequalities. Furthermore, the extensive use of pesticides raised concerns about their impact on human health and the environment. The economic disparity between large farmers (who could afford the inputs) and small farmers (who struggled with costs) also widened in some areas. Understanding these multi-faceted impacts is crucial for evaluating the overall legacy of the Green Revolution in India.
The first phase of the Green Revolution was restricted largely to two crops and the regions where they are grown. Which of the following pairs best represents these two crops?
Which of the following statements is/are true regarding the Green Revolution?
i. The term 'green revolution' was coined by Sir William Gaud.
ii. Norman Borlaug is hailed as the Father of Green Revolution.
iii. MS Randhawa is called the Father of Green Revolution in India.
Which of these is true about the second phase of the green revolution?
Which of these is NOT true about green revolution?
Which of these regions received the first wave of the Green Revolution package?