To obtain a new series of index numbers, the old index numbers are multiplied with which of the following common factor?
Index numbers are statistical tools used to measure the average change in price, quantity, or value of a group of related items over time. They are typically expressed as percentages, relative to a base period (often a specific year) which is assigned an index value of 100.
The base year serves as a reference point. When we say the index number for a particular year is 120, it means the value (price, quantity, etc.) in that year is 120% of the value in the base year, representing a 20% increase.
Sometimes, it becomes necessary to shift the base year of an existing series of index numbers. This might be done for several reasons:
The process of changing the base year involves recalculating each index number in the series so that the index number for the new base year becomes 100.
To convert an old series of index numbers to a new series with a different base year, we use the following formula:
\(\text{New Index Number for a given year} = \frac{\text{Old Index Number for that year}}{\text{Old Index Number for the new base year}} \times 100\)
Let's look at the formula again:
\(\text{New Index Number} = \text{Old Index Number} \times \left( \frac{100}{\text{Old Index Number for the new base year}} \right)\)
In this formula, the term \(\left( \frac{100}{\text{Old Index Number for the new base year}} \right)\) is a constant value for the entire series. It does not change depending on the specific year for which you are calculating the new index number, because the "Old Index Number for the new base year" is fixed once the new base year is chosen.
This constant value is the "common factor" by which every old index number is multiplied to get the new index number.
Therefore, the common factor used to multiply the old index numbers to obtain a new series based on a new base year is \(\frac{100}{\text{Index number of new base year}}\).
Let's consider a simple example. Suppose we have the following index numbers with Year 2000 as the base (Index = 100):
| Year | Old Index (Base: 2000=100) |
|---|---|
| 2000 | 100 |
| 2005 | 150 |
| 2010 | 180 |
| 2015 | 200 |
Now, let's change the base year to 2005. The old index number for the new base year (2005) is 150.
The common factor is \(\frac{100}{\text{Old Index Number for 2005}} = \frac{100}{150}\).
Let's calculate the new index numbers:
The new series of index numbers with 2005 as the base would be approximately 66.67, 100, 120, 133.33.
| Year | New Index (Base: 2005=100) |
|---|---|
| 2000 | 66.67 |
| 2005 | 100 |
| 2010 | 120 |
| 2015 | 133.33 |
This example clearly shows that each old index number is multiplied by the common factor \(\frac{100}{150}\), which is \(\frac{100}{\text{Old Index Number for the new base year}}\).
Based on the formula and the explanation, the common factor required to convert an old series of index numbers to a new series with a different base year is \(\frac{100}{\text{Index number of new base year}}\).
| Concept | Description | Formula/Method |
|---|---|---|
| Index Number | Measures relative change over time compared to a base period. | \(\frac{\text{Value in Current Period}}{\text{Value in Base Period}} \times 100\) |
| Base Year | The reference period assigned an index value of 100. | Chosen period for comparison. |
| Changing Base Year | Shifting the reference point to a different year in the series. | Multiply old indices by a common factor. |
| Common Factor | The constant multiplier used for base shifting. | \(\frac{100}{\text{Old Index Number of the new base year}}\) |
Understanding index numbers involves knowing a few related concepts:
Which of the following is a merit of data tabulation?
In seasonal variations, the duration of time is not more than:
If a constant is added to each observation of a data set, then which of the following measures of dispersion will change?
Which of the following is NOT true for seasonal variation?
The analysis of variance technique was developed by:
For the series 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, the minimum possible value of \(\rm \Sigma_{i=1}^n(x_i-A)^2\) can be attained at:
Suppose that a sample of 100 independent draws from a normal distribution having unknown mean μ and known variance σ2 = 1 is observed. If the sample mean is 5, then the 95% confidence interval for μ is:
Consider the following ANOVA table.
| Source of variation | Degrees of freedom | The sum of Squares (SS) | Mean SS | F Ratio |
| Treatments | a | b | c | 5 |
| Error | 12 | d | 20 | |
| Total | 15 | 540 |
If the mean, mode and quartile deviation of a distribution is 2, 7 and 3, respectively, then Karl Pearson's coefficient of skewness is given by:
The component containing the overall upward or downward pattern of the data in an annual time series is:
Methods of presentation of data are:
Consider 35 i.i.d. observations X1, X2, ...., X15 and Y1, Y2, ..., Y20. Let R be the Wilcoxon's rank sum statistic based on the ranks of the X' s in the combined sample. Then the expected value of R is
Let I, J > 5. Consider two-way ANOVA, where the observations satisfy the linear model
yij = α + βi + γj + εij, 1 ≤ i ≤ I, 1 ≤ j ≤ J
E(εij) = 0, Var(εij) = σ2, \(\sum_{i=1}^{!} β_i=\sum_{j=1}^j γ_j=0 .\)
In this set - up
Let X1,X2,...,Xn be a random sample from exponential distribution with mean θ. Which of the following is NOT a sufficient statistic for θ?
A newly developed algorithm for random number generation needs to be tested. The first step is to check whether the sequence of numbers generated can be considered a random sample from the uniform distribution on the interval (0, 1). Which of the following is an appropriate nonparametric test?