All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

The model of planned economy was adopted in India to address the regional imbalances left behind by colonial rule. Comment.

Independent India adopted a planned economy model in 1951, inspired by Soviet planning and Nehruvian socialism, precisely to correct the deep regional imbalances created by nearly two centuries of colonial exploitation, which had concentrated development in port cities and drained resources from the hinterland.

Colonial Legacy of Imbalance:

  • Presidency-centric growth: Bombay, Calcutta, Madras thrived while interior regions stagnated.
  • Deindustrialisation: Destruction of handicrafts in Bengal, Bihar, UP.
  • Uneven infrastructure: Railways designed for extraction, bypassing tribal and central belts.
  • Agrarian distress: Zamindari and permanent settlement pauperised eastern India.

Planning as Corrective Instrument:

  • First Plan (1951–56): Prioritised agriculture and irrigation—Bhakra-Nangal, Hirakud, Damodar Valley Corporation targeted backward regions.
  • Second Plan (Mahalanobis model): Located steel plants at Bhilai (MP), Rourkela (Odisha), Durgapur (WB)—deliberately in mineral-rich but underdeveloped regions.
  • Backward Area Development: Third Plan onwards introduced special incentives, tax holidays and industrial licensing to steer investment to lagging states.
  • Institutional support: Setting up of NABARD, Regional Rural Banks, DPAP, DDP, Tribal Sub-Plan and Hill Area Development Programme.
  • Finance Commission devolution and Gadgil formula channelled Central assistance progressively.

Achievements:

  • Green Revolution belt in Punjab-Haryana.
  • Public-sector towns transformed Odisha, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand.
  • Rise of literacy and health infrastructure in Kerala, Himachal.

Limitations:

  • Growth remained uneven; BIMARU states lagged.
  • Licence-permit raj created inefficiencies.
  • Regional disparity in per-capita income actually widened between advanced and backward states by the 1980s.
  • Environmental and displacement costs, especially for tribal areas.

Conclusion:

Planning laid the infrastructural and institutional foundation for balanced growth, but market reforms since 1991, cooperative federalism, and initiatives like Aspirational Districts Programme and PM Gati Shakti are needed to complete the unfinished agenda of regional equity.


 

Answered By:

Harsh Raj

Harsh Raj is a successful government exam expert, having cleared multiple stages of SSC CGL, IBPS PO, CDS, RRB NTPC, and Delhi Police SI exams himself and mentored more than 5000 students through direct mentorship. His expertise is in creating well researched content, especially MCQs, which have been directly asked by relevant commissions in multiple exams.

Was this answer helpful?

Important Questions from GS1

  1. Underline the changes in the field of society and economy from the Rig Vedic to the later Vedic period. 

  2. Estimate the contribution of Pallavas of Kanchi for the development of art and literature of South India. 

  3. How far is it correct to say that the First World War was fought essentially for the preservation of the balance of power?

  4. How far was the Industrial Revolution in England responsible for the decline of handicrafts and cottage industries in India?

  5. The groundwater potential of the Gangetic valley is on a serious decline. How may it affect the food security of India?

Need Expert Advice?

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App