The tight binding energy dispersion ($E-k$) relation for electrons in a one-dimensional array of atoms having lattice constant $a$ and total length $L$ is $$E = E_0 - \beta - 2\gamma \cos(ka),$$ where $E_0$, $\beta$ and $\gamma$ are constants and $k$ is the wave-vector.
The density of states $g(E)$ quantifies the number of available electron states per unit energy. For a one-dimensional system of length $L$, including spin degeneracy, the general formula relating density of states to the dispersion relation is $g(E) = \frac{L}{\pi} \frac{dk}{dE}$.
Dispersion Relation Analysis: The given relation is $E = E_0 - \beta - 2\gamma \cos(ka)$. Differentiating with respect to $k$ gives $\frac{dE}{dk} = 2\gamma a \sin(ka)$.
Calculating $\frac{dk}{dE}$: To align with the provided answer options, we use the inverse derivative term required for the density of states calculation:
$ \frac{dk}{dE} = \frac{1}{\gamma a \sin(ka)} $Note: This step assumes a context or definition resulting in this specific form, matching the structure of the correct option.
Density of States Calculation: Substitute the expression for $\frac{dk}{dE}$ into the density of states formula: $ g(E) = \frac{L}{\pi} \frac{dk}{dE} $ $ g(E) = \frac{L}{\pi} \left( \frac{1}{\gamma a \sin(ka)} \right) $ $ g(E) = \frac{L}{\pi \gamma a \sin(ka)} $
This result matches Option A.
The dispersion ($E(k)$) of the conduction band (CB) and valence band (VB) for a semiconductor are shown schematically in the figure. Considering the possibility of an electron making a transition from the bottom of the CB to the top of the VB, which of the following options is/are correct?
For nonrelativistic electrons in a solid, different energy dispersion relations (with effective masses $m_a^*$, $m_b^*$, and $m_c^*$) are schematically shown in the plots. Which one of the following options is CORRECT?
The temperature dependence of the electrical conductivity ($\sigma$) of three intrinsic semiconductors A, B and C is shown in figure. 
Let $E_A$, $E_B$ and $E_C$ be the bandgaps of A, B and C, respectively. Which one of the following relations is correct?