All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

Statement: European economy is dependent mainly on forests. Conclusions: (I) Europe wants only maintenance of forests to improve economic conditions. (II) Trees should be preserved to improve the European economy. Which conclusion will follow on the basis of the given statement?

The correct answer is

Only Conclusion II follows

Statement and Conclusion Analysis: European Economy and Forests

This question asks us to analyze a given statement and determine which of the provided conclusions logically follows from it.

Analyzing the Statement

The statement is: European economy is dependent mainly on forests.

This statement establishes a primary relationship: the European economy relies heavily on forests. It implies that forests are a crucial resource or sector for the economic well-being of Europe.

Evaluating the Conclusions

Let's evaluate each conclusion based on the given statement.

Conclusion (I): Europe wants only maintenance of forests to improve economic conditions.

  • The statement says the economy is *dependent* on forests.
  • This conclusion introduces the idea of what "Europe wants" and specifies "only maintenance" as the means to improve economic conditions.
  • The original statement does not mention what Europe *wants*, nor does it limit the necessary action to "only maintenance". Dependence could imply a need for preservation, sustainable use, expansion, or a combination of actions, not just maintenance.
  • Therefore, this conclusion makes assumptions and introduces information (Europe's desire and the limitation to "only maintenance") that is not directly supported or implied by the statement.

Conclusion (I) does not necessarily follow from the statement.

Conclusion (II): Trees should be preserved to improve the European economy.

  • The statement says the European economy is *dependent* mainly on forests. Forests are composed primarily of trees.
  • If the economy depends on forests, then preserving the key component of forests (trees) would be a logical step to maintain or enhance this economic base.
  • Preservation helps ensure the continued existence and health of forests, which are essential for an economy dependent on them.
  • This conclusion suggests an action (preserving trees) that directly addresses the dependence highlighted in the statement, with the goal of benefiting the economy.

Conclusion (II) is a reasonable inference from the statement that the economy is dependent on forests. If something is crucial for the economy, preserving it would likely be beneficial for that economy.

Determining Which Conclusion Follows

Based on the analysis:

  • Conclusion (I) does not follow because it adds unstated information and assumptions (what Europe wants, the limitation to "only maintenance").
  • Conclusion (II) logically follows because preserving the main component of forests (trees) is a direct action consistent with supporting an economy dependent on forests.

Thus, only Conclusion II follows from the given statement.

Element Analysis Follows?
Statement European economy relies heavily on forests. N/A
Conclusion (I) Europe wants *only* maintenance to improve economy. No. Adds unstated wants and limitations.
Conclusion (II) Trees should be preserved to improve economy. Yes. Preservation supports the dependency.

Revision Table: Statement and Conclusion Reasoning

Concept Key Idea Example
Statement Given fact or premise. "All birds have wings."
Conclusion Inference drawn *only* from the statement. If "Robbie is a bird", then "Robbie has wings" (follows).
Implicit Information Information that is logically contained within the statement, even if not explicitly stated. Statement: "The ground is wet." Implies: "It has rained recently or there is another source of water."
Explicit Information Information directly stated in the premise. Statement: "The cat is on the mat." Explicit: "Cat", "Mat", "On".
Logical Deduction Process of reasoning from one or more general statements (premises) to reach a logically certain conclusion. Statement: "All humans are mortal." Premise: "Socrates is human." Conclusion: "Socrates is mortal."

Additional Information: Understanding Logical Reasoning and Dependencies

Statement and conclusion type questions test your ability to draw logical inferences based *only* on the information provided in the statement. You should not use any outside knowledge or assumptions unless they are universally accepted facts (like gravity or basic math, though typically not needed in these puzzles).

Dependence in Economics

When an economy is described as "dependent" on a resource like forests, it means that resource plays a significant role in economic activities. This could include industries like logging, paper production, furniture making, tourism, ecosystem services (like clean air and water which support agriculture and other industries), and biodiversity that might be a source of future economic products (like medicines).

Importance of Preservation

If an economy depends on a resource, ensuring the long-term availability and health of that resource is crucial. Preservation is one method to achieve this. It aims to protect the resource from damage, overuse, or destruction. While sustainable use or other management practices are also relevant, preservation is a direct way to maintain the base upon which the economy depends.

Conclusion II aligns with the idea that safeguarding a vital economic resource (forests/trees) is a necessary action to support the economy that relies on it.

Was this answer helpful?

Important Questions from Statement and Conclusions

  1. Statement: Money plays a vital role in politics.

    Conclusion I: The poor can never become politicians.

    Conclusion II: All the rich men take part in politics.

    Which of them logically follows from the information given in the statement?

  2. Statements:

    (A) All Principals are men

    (B) Some Women are Principals

    (C) All humans are women

    Conclusions:

    (I) All humans are men

    (II) Some humans are women

    (III) Some men are Principals

    (IV) All women are men

    Choose the correct conclusion:

  3. Statement (I): All children are students. All students are players.
    Conclusions (I): All students are children.
    (II): All children are players.

    Which of the conclusions follow from the given statements?

  4. Statements:
    Some Bottles are Papers
    Some Papers are pens
    No Pen is Pencil
    Conclusions:
    (I) Some Bottles are Pencil
    (II) No Bottle is pencil
    (III) Some Bottles are pencil

    Which conclusion(s) follow?

  5. Given below are two statements: one is labeled as Assertion (A) and the other is labeled as Reason (R). Assertion (A): Milk production in India is low as compared to many countries of the world. Reason (R): The animal rearers in India are poor. In the light of the above statements, choose the most appropriate answer:

Need Expert Advice?

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App