Statement: European economy is dependent mainly on forests.
Conclusions:
(I) Europe wants only maintenance of forests to improve economic conditions.
(II) Trees should be preserved to improve the European economy.
Which conclusion will follow on the basis of the given statement?
Only Conclusion II follows
This question asks us to analyze a given statement and determine which of the provided conclusions logically follows from it.
The statement is: European economy is dependent mainly on forests.
This statement establishes a primary relationship: the European economy relies heavily on forests. It implies that forests are a crucial resource or sector for the economic well-being of Europe.
Let's evaluate each conclusion based on the given statement.
Conclusion (I) does not necessarily follow from the statement.
Conclusion (II) is a reasonable inference from the statement that the economy is dependent on forests. If something is crucial for the economy, preserving it would likely be beneficial for that economy.
Based on the analysis:
Thus, only Conclusion II follows from the given statement.
| Element | Analysis | Follows? |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | European economy relies heavily on forests. | N/A |
| Conclusion (I) | Europe wants *only* maintenance to improve economy. | No. Adds unstated wants and limitations. |
| Conclusion (II) | Trees should be preserved to improve economy. | Yes. Preservation supports the dependency. |
| Concept | Key Idea | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | Given fact or premise. | "All birds have wings." |
| Conclusion | Inference drawn *only* from the statement. | If "Robbie is a bird", then "Robbie has wings" (follows). |
| Implicit Information | Information that is logically contained within the statement, even if not explicitly stated. | Statement: "The ground is wet." Implies: "It has rained recently or there is another source of water." |
| Explicit Information | Information directly stated in the premise. | Statement: "The cat is on the mat." Explicit: "Cat", "Mat", "On". |
| Logical Deduction | Process of reasoning from one or more general statements (premises) to reach a logically certain conclusion. | Statement: "All humans are mortal." Premise: "Socrates is human." Conclusion: "Socrates is mortal." |
Statement and conclusion type questions test your ability to draw logical inferences based *only* on the information provided in the statement. You should not use any outside knowledge or assumptions unless they are universally accepted facts (like gravity or basic math, though typically not needed in these puzzles).
When an economy is described as "dependent" on a resource like forests, it means that resource plays a significant role in economic activities. This could include industries like logging, paper production, furniture making, tourism, ecosystem services (like clean air and water which support agriculture and other industries), and biodiversity that might be a source of future economic products (like medicines).
If an economy depends on a resource, ensuring the long-term availability and health of that resource is crucial. Preservation is one method to achieve this. It aims to protect the resource from damage, overuse, or destruction. While sustainable use or other management practices are also relevant, preservation is a direct way to maintain the base upon which the economy depends.
Conclusion II aligns with the idea that safeguarding a vital economic resource (forests/trees) is a necessary action to support the economy that relies on it.
Statement: Money plays a vital role in politics.
Conclusion I: The poor can never become politicians.
Conclusion II: All the rich men take part in politics.
Which of them logically follows from the information given in the statement?
Statements:
(A) All Principals are men
(B) Some Women are Principals
(C) All humans are women
Conclusions:
(I) All humans are men
(II) Some humans are women
(III) Some men are Principals
(IV) All women are men
Choose the correct conclusion:
Statement (I): All children are students. All students are players.
Conclusions (I): All students are children.
(II): All children are players.
Which of the conclusions follow from the given statements?
Statements:
Some Bottles are Papers
Some Papers are pens
No Pen is Pencil
Conclusions:
(I) Some Bottles are Pencil
(II) No Bottle is pencil
(III) Some Bottles are pencil
Which conclusion(s) follow?
Given below are two statements: one is labeled as Assertion (A) and the other is labeled as Reason (R). Assertion (A): Milk production in India is low as compared to many countries of the world. Reason (R): The animal rearers in India are poor. In the light of the above statements, choose the most appropriate answer: