Given below are two statements: one is labeled as Assertion (A) and the other is labeled as Reason (R).
Assertion (A): Milk production in India is low as compared to many countries of the world.
Reason (R): The animal rearers in India are poor.
In the light of the above statements, choose the most appropriate answer:
Both (A) and (R) are correct but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
The question presents two statements: an Assertion (A) regarding milk production in India being low, and a Reason (R) stating that animal rearers in India are poor. We need to evaluate the correctness of each statement and determine if the Reason correctly explains the Assertion.
Let's consider the statement. Assertion (A) claims that milk production in India is low compared to many other countries. Based on available data, India is actually the world's largest producer of milk. This fact contradicts the assertion that milk production is low.
However, the provided correct answer indicates that Assertion (A) is correct. Therefore, for the purpose of solving this problem based on the given options, we will assume Assertion (A) is considered correct in this context, despite real-world data suggesting otherwise.
Now let's evaluate Reason (R). It states that animal rearers in India are poor. Livestock farming, particularly in rural India, is often carried out by small farmers, marginal farmers, or landless labourers. These groups often belong to economically weaker sections of society. Therefore, it is generally true that many animal rearers in India are poor.
Reason (R) is a fact that holds true for a significant portion of the animal rearing community in India.
We are given that both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are correct. Now we must determine if Reason (R) is the correct explanation for Assertion (A).
Assertion (A) states that milk production is low (assuming this is correct for the problem). Reason (R) states that animal rearers are poor. If animal rearers are poor, this could potentially lead to lower investment in:
These factors (poor feed, healthcare, etc.) could indeed contribute to lower milk yield per animal and overall lower production compared to countries where farming practices are more advanced and farmers are economically better off. So, poverty of rearers *could* be a factor influencing production.
However, the provided correct answer states that Reason (R) is *not* the correct explanation for Assertion (A). This implies that while both statements might be individually true, the poverty of animal rearers is either not the primary reason for low milk production (if it were low), or other factors are considered more significant explanations in the context of the question's intended logic.
Potential factors that *do* significantly influence milk production include:
While poverty affects a rearer's ability to invest in some of these factors, it might not be considered the *sole* or *correct* explanation in this specific assertion-reason pairing, especially when other factors play a crucial role. The question setup suggests that Reason (R), although true, doesn't provide the specific or primary causal link required to explain Assertion (A) correctly according to the problem's logic.
Based on our analysis, assuming (A) is correct as per the implied truth value from the options, and (R) is correct based on general knowledge:
Therefore, the most appropriate answer is that both (A) and (R) are correct, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
| Statement | Evaluation (Based on Question's Premise) |
|---|---|
| Assertion (A): Milk production in India is low... | Correct (as implied by the provided correct answer option) |
| Reason (R): The animal rearers in India are poor. | Correct |
| Relationship | Evaluation (Based on Provided Correct Answer Option) |
|---|---|
| (R) is the correct explanation of (A) | Incorrect |
Reviewing Assertion-Reason questions requires careful evaluation of each statement independently and then the causal link between them. For this question, accepting the statements' truth values as presented in the correct option is crucial.
India has achieved remarkable growth in its milk production over the years. This growth is often attributed to Operation Flood, a program launched to increase milk production, procure milk from farmers, and create a national milk grid. Key aspects include:
While individual animal productivity might still be lower than in some developed countries, the sheer number of dairy animals and rearers contributes to India's top global position in total milk volume. The poverty of many rearers remains a challenge affecting their ability to adopt best practices and invest in better resources, impacting productivity at the individual level, but doesn't render the assertion of "low" national production true in a global context.
Statement: Money plays a vital role in politics.
Conclusion I: The poor can never become politicians.
Conclusion II: All the rich men take part in politics.
Which of them logically follows from the information given in the statement?
Statements:
(A) All Principals are men
(B) Some Women are Principals
(C) All humans are women
Conclusions:
(I) All humans are men
(II) Some humans are women
(III) Some men are Principals
(IV) All women are men
Choose the correct conclusion:
Statement (I): All children are students. All students are players.
Conclusions (I): All students are children.
(II): All children are players.
Which of the conclusions follow from the given statements?
Statements:
Some Bottles are Papers
Some Papers are pens
No Pen is Pencil
Conclusions:
(I) Some Bottles are Pencil
(II) No Bottle is pencil
(III) Some Bottles are pencil
Which conclusion(s) follow?
Statement: European economy is dependent mainly on forests. Conclusions: (I) Europe wants only maintenance of forests to improve economic conditions. (II) Trees should be preserved to improve the European economy. Which conclusion will follow on the basis of the given statement?