Given below are two statements: Statement I: All natural numbers are rational numbers. Statement II: 1 is the smallest prime number. In the light of the above statements, choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below:
Statement I is correct but Statement II is incorrect
The question asks us to evaluate two statements about different types of numbers: natural numbers, rational numbers, and prime numbers. Let's examine each statement carefully.
The two statements are:
Statement I claims that all natural numbers belong to the set of rational numbers. To check if this is true, we need to understand the definitions of these two types of numbers.
Natural Numbers: These are the counting numbers. The set of natural numbers, often denoted by $\mathbb{N}$, includes $\{1, 2, 3, 4, ...\}$. Some definitions also include 0, but commonly in number theory, natural numbers start from 1.
Rational Numbers: These are numbers that can be expressed as a fraction $\frac{p}{q}$, where $p$ and $q$ are integers, and $q$ is not equal to 0. The set of rational numbers is denoted by $\mathbb{Q}$. Examples of rational numbers include $\frac{1}{2}$, $-\frac{3}{4}$, $5$ (since $5 = \frac{5}{1}$), and $0.75$ (since $0.75 = \frac{3}{4}$).
Now, let's consider any natural number, say $n$. Can we write this natural number $n$ as a fraction $\frac{p}{q}$ where $p$ and $q$ are integers and $q \neq 0$? Yes, we can always write any natural number $n$ as $\frac{n}{1}$. Here, $p=n$ and $q=1$. Since $n$ is a natural number, it is also an integer. And $q=1$ is also an integer and is not 0.
Therefore, any natural number $n$ can be expressed in the form $\frac{p}{q}$ where $p$ and $q$ are integers and $q \neq 0$. This means every natural number is a rational number.
Based on this analysis, Statement I is correct.
Statement II claims that 1 is the smallest prime number. To evaluate this, we need to recall the definition of a prime number.
Prime Number: A prime number is a natural number greater than 1 that has no positive divisors other than 1 and itself. By definition, a prime number must be a natural number greater than 1.
Let's look at the first few natural numbers and their divisors:
According to the definition, a prime number must be greater than 1. The number 1 is not greater than 1. Also, 1 only has one positive divisor (1), whereas prime numbers must have exactly two distinct positive divisors (1 and the number itself). Therefore, 1 is not a prime number.
The smallest natural number that meets the definition of a prime number is 2. So, the smallest prime number is 2.
Based on this analysis, Statement II is incorrect.
We have determined the correctness of both statements:
We need to choose the option that reflects these findings.
Option 1: Both Statement I and Statement II are correct (Incorrect)
Option 2: Both Statement I and Statement II are incorrect (Incorrect)
Option 3: Statement I is correct but Statement II is incorrect (Correct)
Option 4: Statement I is incorrect but Statement II is correct (Incorrect)
The most appropriate answer is that Statement I is correct, but Statement II is incorrect.
| Set of Numbers | Description | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Natural Numbers ($\mathbb{N}$) | Positive counting numbers (starting from 1) | 1, 2, 3, 4, ... |
| Integers ($\mathbb{Z}$) | Natural numbers, zero, and negative natural numbers | ..., -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, ... |
| Rational Numbers ($\mathbb{Q}$) | Numbers that can be written as $\frac{p}{q}$ where $p, q$ are integers and $q \neq 0$ | $\frac{1}{2}, -\frac{3}{4}, 5, 0, -1$ |
| Prime Numbers | Natural numbers > 1 with exactly two distinct positive divisors (1 and itself) | 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, ... |
Understanding different sets of numbers is fundamental in mathematics. Here's a bit more detail:
Statement: Money plays a vital role in politics.
Conclusion I: The poor can never become politicians.
Conclusion II: All the rich men take part in politics.
Which of them logically follows from the information given in the statement?
Statements:
(A) All Principals are men
(B) Some Women are Principals
(C) All humans are women
Conclusions:
(I) All humans are men
(II) Some humans are women
(III) Some men are Principals
(IV) All women are men
Choose the correct conclusion:
Statement (I): All children are students. All students are players.
Conclusions (I): All students are children.
(II): All children are players.
Which of the conclusions follow from the given statements?
Statements:
Some Bottles are Papers
Some Papers are pens
No Pen is Pencil
Conclusions:
(I) Some Bottles are Pencil
(II) No Bottle is pencil
(III) Some Bottles are pencil
Which conclusion(s) follow?
Given below are two statements: one is labeled as Assertion (A) and the other is labeled as Reason (R). Assertion (A): Milk production in India is low as compared to many countries of the world. Reason (R): The animal rearers in India are poor. In the light of the above statements, choose the most appropriate answer: