Read the statements and identify the logically correct conclusion from the given information. Statement: “The pedestrian crossing is few feet away. It is safe to use it, “says a mother to her child. Conclusions: I. Pedestrian should use pedestrian crossing for safety.
Only conclusion I follows
Analyzing the Logical Reasoning Statement and Conclusions
The question asks us to evaluate a given statement and determine which of the provided conclusions logically follows from it. This involves careful reading and analysis of the information presented in the statement.
Breaking Down the Statement
The statement is: “The pedestrian crossing is few feet away. It is safe to use it, “says a mother to her child.
Let's identify the key pieces of information in this statement:
- There is a pedestrian crossing nearby ("few feet away").
- Using this pedestrian crossing is safe ("It is safe to use it").
- The speaker is a mother talking to her child.
The core message is about the safety associated with using the pedestrian crossing.
Evaluating Conclusion I: Pedestrian Safety and Crossing
Conclusion I states: Pedestrian should use pedestrian crossing for safety.
Let's compare this with the statement. The mother explicitly says that using the pedestrian crossing is "safe". This implies that the pedestrian crossing provides safety, and therefore, pedestrians should use it for safety. This conclusion is a direct inference based on the safety attribute mentioned in the statement regarding the pedestrian crossing.
Conclusion I logically follows from the statement.
Evaluating Conclusion II: Knowledge of Pedestrian Crossing by Children
Conclusion II states: All the children know what is pedestrian crossing.
The statement involves a mother talking to *her* child. It gives us no information about whether *all* children universally know what a pedestrian crossing is. The mother might be reminding her child, assuming her child knows, or even explaining it. The statement provides no basis to conclude anything about the knowledge level of all children regarding pedestrian crossings.
Conclusion II does not logically follow from the statement.
Identifying the Logically Correct Conclusion
Based on the analysis:
- Conclusion I is a logical deduction from the statement that using the pedestrian crossing is safe.
- Conclusion II makes a broad generalization about all children's knowledge, which is not supported by the specific statement about one mother and her child.
Therefore, only conclusion I logically follows from the given information.
Summary of Conclusions Analysis
| Conclusion | Analysis | Logically Follows? |
|---|---|---|
| I. Pedestrian should use pedestrian crossing for safety. | Statement says using the crossing is safe. Implies using it provides safety. | Yes |
| II. All the children know what is pedestrian crossing. | Statement is about one mother and child. Provides no information about all children's knowledge. | No |
The statement provides a specific reason (safety) for using the pedestrian crossing, which directly supports Conclusion I. Conclusion II introduces information about 'all children's knowledge', which is outside the scope and implication of the original statement.
Revision Table: Logical Reasoning and Conclusions
| Concept | Description | Importance in Logic |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | A declarative sentence that is either true or false. | The premise from which conclusions are drawn. |
| Conclusion | A judgment or decision reached by reasoning. | Must be logically supported by the statement(s). |
| Logical Inference | Deriving a conclusion from given premises. | Ensures the conclusion is valid based on the information provided. |
| Assumption | Something taken for granted or accepted as true without proof. | Should be avoided when drawing logical conclusions unless explicitly stated or implied. |
Additional Information: Understanding Logical Deduction
Logical deduction is a fundamental concept in reasoning. It is the process of starting with a general statement or premise and arriving at a specific conclusion. In the context of this problem, the statement acts as the premise.
A conclusion logically follows a statement if the truth of the statement guarantees the truth of the conclusion. If it is possible for the statement to be true and the conclusion to be false, then the conclusion does not logically follow.
- In this case, if "using the pedestrian crossing is safe" is true (as stated), it strongly supports the idea that it should be used for safety. Conclusion I is consistent with and supported by the statement's assertion of safety.
- However, the statement provides no information about whether children, in general, are aware of what a pedestrian crossing is. The truth of the statement (mother telling her child it's safe to use the crossing) does not prevent Conclusion II (all children know what a pedestrian crossing is) from being false. Therefore, Conclusion II cannot be logically deduced from the statement.
This exercise highlights the importance of sticking strictly to the information provided in the statement when drawing logical conclusions and avoiding bringing in outside knowledge or making unsupported generalizations.
Important Questions from Statements and Conclusions
In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements.
Statements:
I. All A are B.
II. Some B are C.
Conclusions:
I. Some A are C.
II. Some A are not C.
III. Some A are B.
Directions: The questions has a statement followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to decide which of the conclusions follows from the given statement and mark your answer as
Statement: Mr A is not among the candidates shortlisted for the post of vice chancellor of a university
Conclusions :
I) Mr. A will be elected as Vice - chancellor
II) Mr. A will not be considered for the post of Vice-chancellor
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance from commonly established facts, decide which of the conclusions from / logically follows these statements.
Statement:
Poverty makes man hardworking.
Hardworking people are not poor.
Conclusion:
I. A person must be poor to be hardworking.
II. Diligence helps to remove poverty.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully and decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements.
Statement:
A asked C, "What time is it now?" Is it half past two? ''
Conclusions:
1. A wants to go to lunch.
2. A wants to confirm what the time is because his watch is off.
In the question one statement is given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements.
Statement : 55% of Manisha's office colleagues went to watch the movie.
Conclusion I : Manisha went to watch the movie.
Conclusion II : Manisha did not go to watch the movie.
