Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions(s) logically follow(s) from the statements. Statement I: Most of the engineering students are adults. Statement II: Harsh is an adult. Conclusion I: Harsh is an engineering student. Conclusion II: Some engineering students are not adults.
This question tests your ability to analyze given statements and determine which conclusions logically follow from them, based strictly on the information provided, even if it contradicts general knowledge. Let's break down the given statements and conclusions.
We are given two statements:
Statement I tells us something about the relationship between engineering students and adults. The word "Most" is key here. It means a significant majority, more than 50%, but importantly, it does not mean "All". This implies that there is a possibility, or even a certainty in these types of logic problems, that some engineering students are not adults.
Statement II provides specific information about an individual named Harsh, stating that he belongs to the category of adults.
Now let's evaluate each conclusion based solely on the two statements.
Statement II tells us Harsh is an adult. Statement I tells us most engineering students are adults. Does being an adult mean you must be an engineering student? No. There are many adults who are not engineering students. The statements do not provide any information that links Harsh (being an adult) directly to the group of engineering students. Harsh could be any type of adult – a doctor, a teacher, or any other profession, or even unemployed. Therefore, this conclusion does not logically follow from the given statements.
Look closely at Statement I again: "Most of the engineering students are adults." If 'most' are adults, it logically implies that the remaining portion are not adults. If the statement intended to say that *all* engineering students are adults, it would typically use words like "All" or "Every". The use of "Most" specifically leaves room for, and often implies the existence of, the complement group. Therefore, the statement "Most engineering students are adults" logically supports the conclusion that "Some engineering students are not adults". This conclusion logically follows from Statement I.
Based on our analysis:
| Item | Details | Logical Outcome based on Statements |
|---|---|---|
| Statement I | Most engineering students are adults. | Implies some engineering students are not adults. |
| Statement II | Harsh is an adult. | Places Harsh in the category of adults. |
| Conclusion I | Harsh is an engineering student. | Does not follow; Harsh's status as an adult doesn't prove he is an engineering student. |
| Conclusion II | Some engineering students are not adults. | Logically follows from Statement I ("Most" implies "not all"). |
When tackling statement and conclusion questions, keep these points in mind:
In this problem, understanding the implication of the word "Most" in Statement I was crucial to evaluating Conclusion II.
A situation is given, followed by two conclusions I and II. Read the situation and both the conclusions carefully and select the correct answer.
Situation:
Since the past 15 years, 75% of the products in the world’s pottery market comes from Country K. However, the employment in the pottery industry of Country K has been consistently declining by 5-9% every year since the past 3 years.
Conclusions:
I. Even after declining employment, Country K has enough potters to continue contributing equally to the international market.
II. The local demand of pottery in Country K has substantially decreased leading to less interest among potters.
The statement below is followed by three conclusions labelled I, II and III. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the three suggested conclusions logically follows for pursuing.
Statements:
1) No school is an institution but they are establishment.
2) All establishments that are not institutions have buildings.
Conclusions:
I. Schools are not establishments.
II. All schools have buildings.
III. Schools do not have buildings.Read the given statements and conclusion carefully and decide which of the following options is true with respect to the given conclusion.
Statements:
The Gateway of India is in Mumbai.
Mumbai is in India.
Conclusion:
The Gateway of India is in India.
Read the given statements and conclusion carefully and decide which of the following options is true with respect to the given conclusion.
Statements:
Men who are handsome are generally of the intellectual type.
Vikram is handsome.
Conclusion:
Vikram is intellectual.Given is a statement, followed by four conclusions. Read the statement carefully and decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the given statement.
Statement:
This book can help because all good books help.
Conclusions:
I. This is not a good book.
II. This is a good book.
III. No good book helps.
IV. Some good books help.