List - I List - II (a) Convey Vs. Wade (i) Role and right of minority trade unions (b) Rohtas Industries Staff Union Vs. Bihar (ii) Inducement to break a contract without violence is permissible (c) Chairman, S.B.I. Vs. Orissa Bank Association (iii) Amplification of scope of immunity provisions for striking employees (d) Food Corporation of India Staff Union Vs. F.C.I. (iv) Secret ballot is valid as a credible system for determining the representative character of a trade union in a multi union establishment
The question requires matching specific trade union law cases from List-I with the legal principles or outcomes they represent from List-II. The correct matching is determined based on established legal precedents in Indian labour law.
The correct pairings between List-I (Cases) and List-II (Principles) are as follows:
Based on the detailed matching:
This corresponds to Option 3.