Look at the underlined part of each sentence. Below each sentence are given three possible substitutions for the underlined part. If one of them (a), (b) or (c) is better than the underlined part, indicate your response on the Answer Sheet against the corresponding letter (a), (b) or (c). If none of the substitutions improves the sentence, indicate (d) as your response on the Answer Sheet. Thus a “No improvement” response will be signified by the letter (d). It was the mother of the girl of whose voice I had recognized.
whose voice
The question asks us to examine the underlined part of the sentence, "It was the mother of the girl of whose voice I had recognized," and determine if one of the given substitutions improves the sentence.
The underlined phrase is "of whose voice". This involves the relative pronoun "whose".
The original sentence is "It was the mother of the girl of whose voice I had recognized." Let's break down the components:
The relative pronoun "whose" is used to show possession. It links the possessor (the girl) to the possessed item (her voice). The structure "whose voice" means "the voice of the girl".
Using "of whose voice" is redundant. "Whose" already incorporates the idea of "of whom" or "of which". Therefore, "of whose voice" is equivalent to saying "of the voice of the girl", which is grammatically awkward and incorrect in this context.
Let's look at the proposed substitutions:
Substituting "of whose voice" with "whose voice" gives us: "It was the mother of the girl whose voice I had recognized."
In this sentence, "whose voice I had recognized" is a relative clause modifying "the girl". "Whose" is the possessive relative pronoun linking "girl" to "voice". The structure "whose voice" correctly means "the voice of the girl". This sentence is grammatically correct and flows naturally.
Substituting with "the voice of who" gives us: "It was the mother of the girl the voice of who I had recognized."
The phrase "the voice of who" is grammatically incorrect. "Who" is a subject pronoun. When referring to possession or following a preposition like "of", we would use "whom" in formal contexts, or more commonly, the possessive "whose". Furthermore, the structure "the girl the voice of who" is awkward and doesn't form a proper relative clause.
Substituting with "voice whose" gives us: "It was the mother of the girl voice whose I had recognized."
The word order "voice whose" is incorrect for a relative clause modifying "the girl". The possessive relative pronoun "whose" should typically precede the noun it modifies ("whose voice", "whose car", etc.).
Since option (a) provides a clear grammatical improvement over the original sentence, "No improvement" is not the correct response.
Comparing the options, "whose voice" is the only grammatically correct and natural-sounding substitution that properly forms a relative clause modifying "the girl" and indicating possession of the voice.
| Phrase | Grammatical Correctness | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| of whose voice (original) | Incorrect/Redundant | "Whose" already implies "of whom/which". "Of whose voice" is redundant. |
| whose voice (Option a) | Correct | "Whose voice" correctly means "the voice of the girl", forming a proper relative clause. |
| the voice of who (Option b) | Incorrect | "Who" is a subject pronoun. Incorrect structure for a relative clause. |
| voice whose (Option c) | Incorrect | Incorrect word order for the possessive relative pronoun "whose". |
Let's quickly review some relevant grammar points:
"Whose" is a versatile relative pronoun. While most commonly used for people (like in this question, referring to a girl), it can also be used for animals or even things, especially in formal writing, although "of which" is often preferred for things.
Examples of using "whose":
Remember that "whose" is a relative pronoun showing possession, whereas "who's" is a contraction of "who is" or "who has". These are often confused but have very different meanings and uses.
In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the alternative which will improve the underlined part of the sentence. In case no improvement is needed, select “No improvement”
My old teacher gave many poor students money in spite of he was poor.
In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the alternative which will improve the underlined part of the sentence. In case no improvement is needed, select “No improvement”.
You should to read the newspaper regularly if you want to be well-informed.
In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the alternative which will improve the underlined part of the sentence. In case no improvement is needed, select “No improvement”.
If he had listening to me he would not have got lost.
In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the alternative which will improve the underlined part of the sentence. In case no improvement is needed, select “No improvement”
He asked for a bank loan also he didn't have sufficient resources.
In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the alternative which will improve the underlined part of the sentence. In case no improvement is needed, select “No improvement”.
I went to the shop to buy some stationeries .