In this question, a statement is given followed by two conclusions. Choose the conclusion(s) which best fit(s) logically. Statement: Candidates should be young, energetic and dynamic in the age group of 27 to 32 years. Conclusions: I. Persons below 27 years are not energetic. II. Persons above 32 years are not young.
Neither conclusion I nor II follows
Analyzing Statement and Conclusions on Candidate Requirements
The question presents a statement about the ideal characteristics and age group for candidates, followed by two conclusions. We need to determine which conclusion(s) logically follow from the given statement.
Understanding the Statement
The statement is: Candidates should be young, energetic and dynamic in the age group of 27 to 32 years.
This statement sets a specific requirement for candidates for a particular role. It says that *if* someone is a candidate, and they are within the 27 to 32 age group, they *should* possess the qualities of being young, energetic, and dynamic. It defines what is expected within this specific context and age range.
Evaluating Conclusion I
Conclusion I states: Persons below 27 years are not energetic.
Let's analyze if this conclusion can be drawn from the statement:
- The statement focuses on candidates aged 27-32 and the qualities expected from them (energetic, young, dynamic).
- It says nothing about people outside this specific age range (below 27 or above 32).
- Just because candidates aged 27-32 are required to be energetic does not mean that people younger than 27 are *not* energetic. People below 27 could be very energetic, or not. The statement provides no information to support this claim.
Therefore, Conclusion I does not logically follow from the statement.
Evaluating Conclusion II
Conclusion II states: Persons above 32 years are not young.
Let's analyze if this conclusion can be drawn from the statement:
- The statement specifies that candidates in the 27-32 age group are considered "young" *within the context of this requirement*.
- It does not define "young" universally or make any general statement about what ages constitute "young".
- It certainly makes no claim about people older than 32 years. Whether a person above 32 is considered "young" might depend on the context, culture, or perspective, but the given statement provides no information to conclude that they are *not* young.
Therefore, Conclusion II does not logically follow from the statement.
Determining Which Conclusion(s) Follow
Based on the analysis of each conclusion against the statement, neither Conclusion I nor Conclusion II can be logically derived from the given information.
Therefore, the correct answer is that neither conclusion follows.
| Element | Content/Claim | Logical Derivation from Statement? | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Statement | Candidates @ 27-32 years should be young, energetic, dynamic. | N/A | Given premise. |
| Conclusion I | Persons < 27 years are not energetic. | No | Statement is silent on energy levels of people < 27. |
| Conclusion II | Persons > 32 years are not young. | No | Statement defines 'young' for candidates @ 27-32 only; silent on people > 32. |
Revision Table: Key Learnings
| Concept | Explanation | How it Applies Here |
|---|---|---|
| Logical Deduction | Drawing a conclusion that must be true if the statement is true. | We test if conclusions I and II *must* be true based *only* on the statement. |
| Scope of Statement | The limits of what the statement is actually talking about. | The statement is specifically about candidates in the 27-32 age group, not about all people of all ages. |
| Assumptions | Information you add that is not in the statement. | Assuming people < 27 are not energetic or people > 32 are not young are assumptions not supported by the statement. |
Additional Information: Statement and Conclusion Tips
When tackling statement and conclusion problems in logical reasoning, remember these tips:
- Stick to the Statement: Only use the information given in the statement. Do not use your own general knowledge or make assumptions.
- Analyze Each Conclusion Separately: Evaluate whether each conclusion logically follows from the statement independently.
- Look for Strong Links: A valid conclusion must be directly and necessarily implied by the statement. If there's any doubt or if it requires outside information, it doesn't follow.
- Pay Attention to Quantifiers: Words like "all," "some," "none," "should," "only" are crucial for understanding the statement's scope. In this case, "Candidates should be... in the age group of 27 to 32 years" limits the scope significantly.
This type of question tests your ability to perform strict logical deduction based *only* on the provided premises.
Important Questions from Statements and Conclusions
A situation is given, followed by two conclusions I and II. Read the situation and both the conclusions carefully and select the correct answer.
Situation:
Since the past 15 years, 75% of the products in the world’s pottery market comes from Country K. However, the employment in the pottery industry of Country K has been consistently declining by 5-9% every year since the past 3 years.
Conclusions:
I. Even after declining employment, Country K has enough potters to continue contributing equally to the international market.
II. The local demand of pottery in Country K has substantially decreased leading to less interest among potters.
The statement below is followed by three conclusions labelled I, II and III. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the three suggested conclusions logically follows for pursuing.
Statements:
1) No school is an institution but they are establishment.
2) All establishments that are not institutions have buildings.
Conclusions:
I. Schools are not establishments.
II. All schools have buildings.
III. Schools do not have buildings.Read the given statements and conclusion carefully and decide which of the following options is true with respect to the given conclusion.
Statements:
The Gateway of India is in Mumbai.
Mumbai is in India.
Conclusion:
The Gateway of India is in India.
Read the given statements and conclusion carefully and decide which of the following options is true with respect to the given conclusion.
Statements:
Men who are handsome are generally of the intellectual type.
Vikram is handsome.
Conclusion:
Vikram is intellectual.Given is a statement, followed by four conclusions. Read the statement carefully and decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the given statement.
Statement:
This book can help because all good books help.
Conclusions:
I. This is not a good book.
II. This is a good book.
III. No good book helps.
IV. Some good books help.
